this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
79 points (100.0% liked)

movies

22818 readers
5 users here now

Rules for Movies & TV Discussion

  1. Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.

  2. Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.

  3. On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.

Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.

AVATAR 3

Perverts Guide to Ideology

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

yea

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It does seem boomeriffic to dismiss the prequels entirely even if they were jank and silly for adults that watched them when they came out.

I highly doubt the Disney trilogy will have kids remember them that fondly, or at all.

[–] Dolores@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago (3 children)

if kids could be made nostalgic for the damn Phantom Menace, they can be made nostalgic for the sequel trilogy

[–] DefinitelyNotAPhone@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

At least Phantom Menace was trying to do something original and coherent. It's a shit execution, but there's a story in there that doesn't suck.

[–] AssortedBiscuits@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago

It also had podracing. There should be an entire movie or series that's just about the seedy podracing competitive scene.

[–] Babs@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago

All of Star Wars feels like a good story told poorly.

[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago

nah, because before you had the prequel movies and like, a show or two of starwars

now they're drowning in it like with capeshit, I doubt much of it will stick out for them

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Maybe, but I have nieces that would be the ideal age for nostalgia for that movie and they seem more interested in remembering Ewoks.

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Have you seen the prequels recently? If not I'd genuinely love to hear your report after a rewatch. I think they're total crsp but as I've said before, I don't think there's 3 movies I could have more to say about. I'm not totally sure how to touch on it without going into a whole thing. I mostly like the first movie cause I like weird old Sci fi and 70s movies, empire is a great sequel and a better movie for sure, just doesn't have the personal appeal and I feel about the same as the common man about jedi. Same with the sequels except I'd point out the chemistry between the main characters in force awakens that is never used again, lot of wasted potential trial splitting the 3 mains up all the time. Force Awakens was kinda cool and at leat seemed to be going in a direction and then t wasn't but there was nothing like Dexter Jettster or Qui Gom Jinn's aeird nonsensical gambling addiction

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago

Have you seen the prequels recently? If not I'd genuinely love to hear your report after a rewatch.

They're awkward and bad, but they have a sort of unique awkward badness to them that makes them at least bearable to sit through. In a way, having no expectations on rewatches helped with that.

Fin was done dirty by the Disney sequels; he could have been the real next Luke and if any bad ideas could have been salvaged from Rise of Skywalker, it would be Rey's easy mode Force powers actually being a dark side temptation with her as something like the final antagonist for Fin to face.

But because of the slapfight between each movie's "auteurs" nothing of value persisted from movie to movie.