this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Chicago Bears

2 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just a reminder to the people saying to get MHJ and figure out the qb situation later just how little an all time great, if not the greatest wide receiver ever, has on winning if you don't have a decent quarterback. As great as MHJ might be the return he offers isn't even a fraction to as much as if Maye or Caleb end up being great or even just good. The potential return on investment is just too much to pass up with a qb draft this highly touted.

If the Bears have a top 2 pick they aren't even going to consider MHJ, the only chance is if the Panthers drop to 3 or later where you consider him and then a qb later with our pick.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pearso66@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Orlovsky was the QB. Even if you don't like Fields, we can all admit he's better than Orlovsky. Bears D is light years better than that Lions D too.

[–] OkBoomer6919@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No, we really can't. Fields doesn't win games. I'd not rate him above anyone at this point. He's a loser.

[–] pearso66@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Given the fact he's won games without any WR, I'd say that puts him ahead of Orlovsky