Chicago Bears

2 readers

1 users here now

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

communick@nfl.community

The last time the Bears had consistent QB play was Cutler and that should tell you something. (alien.top)

submitted 2 years ago by MikeBinfinity@alien.top to c/bears@nfl.community

45 comments fedilink hide all child comments

This franchise can't develop rookies QBs for nothing. You guys are hoping for the next Justin Herbert to come here and overcome this next coaching staffs ineptitude.

Instead of rolling the dice again for another half decade of (please be good) QB play, why don't you consider trading for an established quarterback. Kyler Murray, Dak Prescott, hell trade the number one overall for Justin Herbert, he might want out of LA.

It literally doesn't matter who the Bears draft this year, they won't be good because the Bears have NEVER shown that they can develop a QB.

Ok I'm out.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] stormstopper@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

If an established quarterback comes onto the market, that's absolutely an option we should be considering. That's just rarely the case, especially not at a reasonable price. The last time we were in the QB market was when Deshaun Watson and Russell Wilson were reportedly on the block. Obviously we're now glad we didn't get Watson, and Seattle ultimately decided against trading Wilson that offseason at all.

Additionally, none of the people who will be involved in the process of evaluating our QB options this offseason--regardless of who we do or don't retain--were involved in picking Fields or Trubisky or any other QB this franchise has ever selected unless the McCaskeys get themselves involved. Different OC, different coach, different GM, different team president, different eyes, different processes.