this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2024
116 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] wopazoo@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

realistically could provide enough power for what people actually need, but not for what Americans want

"What Americans want" is a non-starter. Americans want to live in detached single-family housing and drive Cadillac Escalades. Any serious application of intermittent renewables (solar, wind) will require fitting the demand to the supply, not the other way around. Factories will only run when the Sun shines and the wind blows. Air conditioners will only run when power is plentiful.

Solar power has become so cheap and plentiful that at midday, electricity prices become negative. You will simply have to adapt to only using electricity when it's available.

it still doesn't require literal 100,000+ acres to work.

You are not up to date with present-day solar tech. 100 000 acres (405 km^2) is 25 000 MW, larger than even the Three Gorges Dam (the largest power plant of any type) in power production.

Also, 405 km^2 is really not that much. Nevada is 286 382 km^2, for comparison. Producing power in a neighboring state/province is really not that big of a problem anymore, with recent advancements in long-distance power transmission.