Star Wars

5920 readers

19 users here now

Discussion for all things Star Wars. Movies, books, games, TV shows and more are welcome.

Keep it civil. Don’t insult other community members in posts or comments, and don’t make posts designed to insult other community members or parts of the fandom with different opinions.
Posts must be on-topic.
No real life politics. That means no political advocacy, and no real life political discussions vaguely dressed up as on-topic posts. If you want to discuss real life politics, you are free to start your own community.
No memes/low-effort spam/Youtube poops style posts. !starwarsmemes@lemmy.world is a place for those.
Posts must be coherent.
If a post is otherwise allowed but has realistic gore or nudity, please mark it NSFW.

Community icon art from DeviantArt user DavidDeb.

Banner art by Ralph McQuarrie.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

_finger_@lemmy.world

setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

325

George Lucas before CGI. (files.catbox.moe)

submitted 2 years ago by Blaze@reddthat.com to c/star_wars@lemmy.world

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Damn I've been watching this all morning. Really interesting watch. The main takeaway is that the "practical vs CGI" debate is entirely fabricated by the media, but doesn't exist in the film industry. Though it seems likely that studios have something like Non-disclosure Agreements with actors and directors where they have to talk around it.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 2 years ago

The public have no idea what CGI even means. Technically something like The Volume is CGI, but most people would look at it and think they are seeing practical effects, because, in a very real sense, they are seeing a practical effect, a practical effect that's also CGI.

The fact that an effect can be both, undermines the whole definition the public have in their minds.