this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
244 points (96.2% liked)

Not The Onion

17185 readers
361 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/14117334

AMC Exec: We Wouldn't Have Made the Dune Popcorn Bucket if We Knew You'd Be Sickos About It

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 60 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They knew exactly what people would do. All marketing is good marketing.

[–] Album@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 year ago

Yep there's no way they didn't see it coming. I'm not saying this was day 1 intent but surely before release somebody had the realization that it had potential to be used in other ways.

[–] jenny_ball@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago
[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Why don't companies have someone in product development who's entire job is to point out less than desirable ways people will use their products, or protect against rule 34 or the like? The internet has been around long enough that it shouldn't have been a surprise that there were people who wanted to fuck a plastic lamprey eel. How as this even surprising?

[–] MissJinx@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hire a 13yo boy just to look at your products and point out all of the ways it can be badly interpreted

[–] pikmeir@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

They made a movie about that once with Tom Hanks. Guess these companies never watched it 😏

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Red Teams, they exist.

Just like QA it doesn’t “make money” so why bother?

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I would argue that QA saves you money. In that, it detects faulty products and in doing so limit liability.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree whole heartedly, the “it doesn’t make money” argument is common and the fight to do proper QA is rarely won.

[–] Malfeasant@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The problem is QA vs QC. Quality control means you actually have to do stuff. Quality assurance just means "I assure you, the quality is good ;)"

[–] gimpchrist@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

If you don't have a QA you run the risk of having to rebuild the entire bar from scratch

[–] XeroxCool@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

QC detects problems. QA predicts, mitigates, and resolves problems. QA is the first to go when it's cheaper to scrap problems rather than make perfect product. QC goes when companies can outsource it to supplier-reported inspections and then leave it to the customer to act as final inspection. The Amazon method that everyone has to follow if they want to stay competitive

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because that employee would be by far the most overworked one in most companies?

Or maybe just because most companies don't care as long as you keep giving them money without costing them any 🤷

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And HR would hate them.

The "Hey, did you know that you can Fuck this?" Guy.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I’d replace HR with that guy honestly

[–] PoastRotato@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

...driving people to go crazy with demand for the shai-hulussy-shaped vessel.

This can't be legal

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure it's in a "shouldn't be but is" grey area along with the likes if gerrymandering and planned obsolescence 🤷

[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Bless the Maker and his shai-hulussy

Bless the coming in Him

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure that the marketing department that brought us roughly a dozen The Walking Dead spinoffs can't climax WITHOUT hearing the words "vagina dentata"

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 5 points 1 year ago

Vagina dentata

What a wonderful phrase

Vagina dentata

Ain't no passing craze

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Internet's been around for about 40 years, sounds like a you problem

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it's silly to be such delicate prudes about it tbh lol

[–] goblin@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] MadBigote@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

So the bucket was sold in other places? I thought it was just a gimmick from the movie theaters in mexico to boost sales.

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They probably paid some TikToker to make videos about it's other uses to pump sales

[–] gimpchrist@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

This is actively promoting it. They absolutely knew.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 11 points 1 year ago

It should have been the "pain box" that Paul has to put his hand in!

[–] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

of course they knew it. that is why they did it.