this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
122 points (96.9% liked)

Global News

4105 readers
141 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The reported friendly-fire incident in Jabalia is one of the deadliest since the war began.

Archived version: https://archive.ph/HLsNX

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 66 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

These Israeli soldiers must have been terrorists. I guess it's true what people say about IDF. They shoot anything that moves.

Hamas tunnels in their aorta

[–] HeadfullofSoup@kbin.earth 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And with all the bombing IDF soldier are probably the last thing moving there

[–] Land_Strider@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Last thing or not, bombings and shootings will continue until ~~the morale improves~~ the beach houses are built.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they must have looked like kids

[–] ivanafterall@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

They were really far away, so they looked tiny.

[–] londos@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

How could Hamas do this?

[–] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago
[–] culpritus@hexbear.net 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

According to the IDF's website, 44 of the soldiers killed in Gaza as of Wednesday - 15% of the total - died as a result of what it describes as "operational accidents".

This seems really high.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Probably a lot higher as well. Historically friendly fire numbers make up anywhere from 2-20% of casualties. The actual amount reported tends to go up the longer people have to investigate the engagements. And most governments are motivated to cover up friendly fires until at least until the war is over.

Typically the more lopsided the war is, the more likely friendly fire will make up a large part of your combat casualties. That is why around a quarter of the combat losses in the first Gulf war was friendly fire.

It wouldn't surprise me if the actual friendly fire rate is closer to 25-40% of their combat casualties considering they're mostly made of poorly drilled conscripts.

[–] CyberSyndicalist@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

15% of deaths being helicopter crashes from trying to medivac semen sounds about right for the IDF tbh

[–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

uncritical support for the IDF going after war criminals

[–] machinin@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

It's a good start!

[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

did the soldiers condemn Hamas?

[–] happybadger@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

Finally living up that nickname of most moral army in the world.

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 6 points 1 year ago

Congrats to the IDF for receiving this week's IDF Destroyer award

[–] HuddaBudda@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The tanks identified a weapon in the building and fired two shells towards it, the probe found.
Seven other soldiers were injured by the tank fire, three of them severely.

Sounds like a tank gunner panic'ed when he/she saw a possible weapon that could take out the tank, with no communication for ground troops.

Another tragic loss of life. So Netanyahu can escape corruption charges.

[–] emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

with no communication for ground troops.

I mean, friendly fire due to miscommunication seems like a problem any army would have anticipated and planned for.

[–] Sauvandu60@lemmy.id 3 points 1 year ago

ooof... friendly fire.

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee -5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why is lemmy.zip still federated with Hexbear??

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I also am not sure. My instance is also federated with them. I mostly just see CCP propaganda from them.

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Exactly. The responses I'm getting here are ignoring what I'm saying and acting like they're just people with opinions I don't like.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Some concrete examples of instances which we would defederate: An instance which is focused on creating spam in the network

Why doesn't spamming authoritarian propaganda count? Better to have corporate ads than dictators' lies.

[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just because you dont like their content doesn't mean it's spam. Just filter hexbear posts and grow some thicker skin

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not normal content, it's propaganda. Whether that's technically spam or not, it's disinformation and intentionally corrosive content designed to spread division and hate.

It's not about me filtering out their propaganda and creating an echochamber. It's about resisting propaganda from dictators, and about playing a part in the Fediverse to help it survive and replace corporate social media.

People checking out Lemmy see Hexbear comments and go back to Reddit or wherever they came from. There are constant threads asking "how can I block a whole instance".

[–] jonne 1 points 1 year ago

You know, you don't have to be here if you don't like the instance's policies. You're free to defederate yourself.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Having an opinion someone doesn't agree with doesn't make it invalid. I'm not an instance admin, so I have no say in who gets defederated, but in this community I welcome all opinions, no matter how popular or unpopular they might be.

People from democratic countries might call anything that doesn't agree with their world view a propaganda, yet on the flip side, countries from non-democratic countries might call anything that doesn't agree with their world view a propaganda. If we can't discuss our differences, then we are living in a bubble. If someone is never challenged, how can they refine their own position?

Rhetorical question to think about. Americans are likely to elect self-proclaimed authoritarian in the next election, should everyone defederate from instances that allow their opinions too?

In any case, this is not a place for this discussion. I would suggest making a post in !home@lemmy.zip.

[–] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I'm tolerant of different opinions, authoritarian propaganda isn't a different opinion, it's large scale coordinated misinformation. In this case coming from a government that has a long history of brutally killing people with "the wrong opinion".