this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
1770 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

71447 readers
2814 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 319 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Eat shit, lobbying to make simple tax returns something you have to pay Turbo Tax, H&R Block, etc for.

[–] School_Lunch@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I don't know much about investing, but i wonder if it would it be a good time to short those companies?

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 116 points 1 year ago (6 children)

If you don't know much about investing then you shouldn't short anything ever. People who know about investing will tell you that even when your logic is 100 percent sound, the market isn't that predictable and in general the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent.

[–] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 1 year ago

Plus, the news of this would already be priced into the stock, so if anything the price is already low and these companies would need to pivot their business (which would increase the value again) or die (which would lower the price marginally, to zero). Either way, shorting is a bad strategy in this case.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

it wouldve been earlier, but now this is priced into the stocks already.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Dekthro@lemm.ee 134 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Eat shit [insert private company here]

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 28 points 1 year ago (14 children)

I hope every CEO gets the worse form of cancer and dies slowly.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 85 points 1 year ago (4 children)

why isn't this constitutionally protected.

Can we pass an amendment for this shit? It's actually kind of fucked up.

[–] DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works 64 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Kind of? Are you going to tell us that the US healthcare system is "sorta silly" next?

[–] skullone@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Sorta silly?! It's fucked beyond belief. Source: me, someone who profits off the healthcare industry as a corpo. Sorry 🤷.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think that some companies like turbotax are employing lobbyists to make impossible filing for taxes unless you go through a gatekeeper

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Gigan@lemmy.world 78 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Wait really? What's the catch?

[–] PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world 190 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Doubt there is one. The hard truth is that most Americans' taxes are pretty simple and straightforward. We can stop pretending that copying some boxes from a W2 and a 1099 is difficult.

I mean, personally I wish we'd stop pretending that the IRS isn't already fully aware of what you owe and could just do the filling for you, like in other countries, but until Grover Norquist fucks off forever we're stuck where we are.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Right. Filing taxes should only be necessary if you have itemized writeoffs or wish to contest the IRS's statement of your tax liability. They already know what you earned their your employer, what's been paid in taxes, what basic credits your qualify for, etc. They know what you owe so long as you didn't have expenses to apply for that they couldn't assume or know about. The only reason they don't already do that or, at least until now, have a free public system for filing, it's because tax companies have lobbied for decades to be able to milk the public for cash to help them file and navigate their tax liability.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago (6 children)

The argument has been since free filing means only the wealthy will hire accountants, free filing would discriminate against the poor given a few mistakes will be made here and there.

I may not need to mention that disingenuous argument is made by the pirates at Intuit and their lobbyists.

[–] PseudorandomNoise@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (5 children)

free filing would discriminate against the poor

As opposed to the current system where the richest among us can hire a whole team of accountants to find every deduction possible?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] SexualPolytope@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I've been in the US for a few years now. All my colleagues told me that doing taxes is hard. So I used to reluctantly pay money to do it through Sprintax. This year, I decided to do it by hand. It took almost the same amount of time as it would've taken to do it through Sprintax, which is around 30 minutes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 35 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Unless it's changed from the pilot, it's only useful if you file a 1040EZ or take some really basic deductions. Anything beyond the basics, like any kind of investments, means you need to use a different tool.

But freetaxusa is still free for all but the most complex cases.

[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

From the article:

The pilot program targeted people with simple tax returns based on W-2 forms. In her remarks today Yellen said that over the next few years they will expand Direct File to support more situations.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

I expect that you'll have to pay the money according to the statement

[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

The catch is that Turbo Tax and H&R Block are gonna lose a ton of revenue

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] xeekei@lemm.ee 71 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LucidNightmare@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago (14 children)

The catch is that it requires ID.me, and there is no way in hell I'm giving some third party a picture of my fucking drivers license.

[–] 240p@lemmy.sdf.org 45 points 1 year ago

I hope more scrutiny is given to ID.me. I'll only be using Direct File if they remove it as a dependency.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Seems odd. They've been pushing login.gov like everywhere.

[–] binomialchicken@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It will eventually be supported, and in the interim they have stated that they won't keep biometric data obtained through ID.me once a verification is completed, or you can opt for an online interview where no biometrics are collected in the first place.

https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/irs-statement-new-features-put-in-place-for-irs-online-account-registration-process-strengthened-to-ensure-privacy-and-security

Who knows if ID.me will actually delete the data on their end though, or if the online interview is recorded by the provider.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interesting that third parties like TurboTax aren't required to obtain copies of your photo ID.

[–] LucidNightmare@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I looked it up, and there is an article from the end of last year that says they are about to be required or are already required.

I can't recall ever putting my license on one of these tax preppers, but I am also older and more privacy concerned in my older age, so I would definitely not do it now.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] shimura@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago (16 children)

Mine was too complicated to file for free because I have retirement investments? Seems like a silly reason to force someone to use a paid service.

[–] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You’re not supposed to be wrecking our economy like that. Spend, baby, spend.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Ioughttamow@kbin.run 37 points 1 year ago

Thank fuck. Finally

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Biden did that, among many other great things for the average american citizen

[–] Vorticity@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even without access to Direct File since I wasn't in a pilot state, I've been using the IRS' "Free Fillable Forms" for the last few years and they've worked great! They don't hold your hand as much as the paid software but for my returns they've been more than adequate and free!

Does anyone know how "Direct File" differs from the "Free Fillable Forms"? Does it hold your hand a little more and help you find credits/deductions? Free Fillable Forms worked well, but only so long as I knew what I needed to file. New circumstances, like adding a dependent, lead to a lot of research.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Good. Now make it work for everyone's tax situation.

[–] Tregetour@lemdro.id 16 points 1 year ago

You need to enable JavaScript to use Direct File.

On the plus side, UBO only had to block one script (on the login page at least).

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Fuck TurboTax, fuck H$R Block

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

how much longer til they just do it for me and leave me the fuck alone?

[–] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As a tax accountant, I sincerely hope this gets to a point where a vast majority of the population has no need for my services.

I used to play in the big leagues where none of my clients would ever qualify for this and their returns routinely took upwards of a hundred hours to complete. Those guys need to keep paying.

Now I play down in the minors a couple steps above the Block, and I hate seeing the owner sell these three or four hundred dollar returns that might take me an hour to complete in the first year and maybe thirty minutes in subsequent years.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›