even funnier than the self-aggrandizement to me is him assuming that whatever future scholar is reading his notes on Capital is too dumb to figure out what GS means in context
the_dunk_tank
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
tbh given the galactic takes given by historians and classicists, I would absolutely add notes if I suspected anyone would give a shit enough to read anything I wrote.
interesting argument liberal, but alas I was too busy literally reading Capital Volume III all morning to consider it.
Question: what the fuck did he wrote as a note? I can't read it...
GS=Global South (in case my future biographer is wondering LOL!)
Ah okay.... that's egoistic of him, but other than the fact that he's a patsoc... I cannot forgive the handwriting and photo angles of these notes...
of exploitation
GS = Global South (in case any of my future biographers are wondering LOL!)
i remember like in mid-2020 when his content was much more about the exploitation of the proletariat. the fuck is wrong with people on social media. capitalism i guess.
I'm trying to imagine what the biography would even be about. "Once upon a time there was a wrestler who decided to create a youtube channel about Marxism. No, they didn't involve themselves in the struggles of their time, but they preached a bespoke form of vulgar communism that didn't go anywhere." Wow, what a great story. Worth immortalizing and learning from for future generations.
Yeah let's let the guy permanently addicted to humiliating himself for clout because he doesn't want to get a real job tell us about narcissism