this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
1148 points (98.2% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6583 readers
238 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Depress_Mode@lemmy.world 72 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

No, this timeline started with “Shit, our calculations show that we might ruin the world in just a few decades at this rate. Oh, well. Probably best not to mention this to anyone.”

[–] stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net 27 points 2 years ago

Do you think they're thinking "we'll be dead before things get really bad and fuck our kids" or "if we make our families super wealthy they'll be feudal lords after civilization collapses"?

[–] ApexHunter@lemmy.ml 43 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

This xkcd is what finally resolved the "is it us or natural variation" question for me: https://xkcd.com/1732/

[–] Asimo@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's always the rate of change.

I remember a few years ago people arguing the temperatures have changed before and that theres billions spent on climate change and it's all propaganda.

They wouldn't listen to the rate of change argument then or acknowledge the trillions spent in industries causing climate change. I'm not sure they've changed their minds still ( I refused to engage them any further) but this is the challenge - so many people believe what they want to believe and don't want the hard truth.

[–] Kage520@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

The Inconvenient Truth. That was so aptly named. Humans will do anything for the sake of convenience and climate change is quite inconvenient. Maybe if we make burning up the planet MORE inconvenient then it will change. Ridiculous taxes for carbon output sounds nice. Those tax dollars then spent on cloud seeding for the short term and carbon capture for the long term.

[–] SuddenDownpour@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A lot of people love rationalising their own beliefs but hate reasoning out what's right and wrong. It makes me lose faith in humanity.

[–] emptyother@programming.dev 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A lot? We all need to be aware that we are able to hold on to faulty beliefs. We are only human.

Especially now with the amount of fake news

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

There's no oops or fuck about it. They are gleefully driving us off the cliff like Thelma and Louise with conservatives cheering the whole way down.

The best we can hope for is to exact some form of harsh justice before nature has its way with them. We are already dead either way. Will they die in luxury or will they die in the streets with the rest of us?

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 years ago

Oops was in the 90s and fuck hit about 2005. Climate scientists knew it.

Though in the 90's, which is when I got my biology degree, they assumed they'd be dead before it got really bad. Consider that oops 2.0

[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago

The "oops" and "fuck" are the public who are successfully reached by oil giant marketing and propaganda, the majority of people who think the first two statements are true and won't enjoy the final results.

[–] Nonameuser678@aussie.zone 29 points 2 years ago

We've entered the 'this is the new normal now, get used to it' phase.

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 24 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Don't disagree with this at all, just noting that the start of that line could be stretched much further back, we have known that human consumption of coal was having/would have a detrimental impact on climate for well over 100 years 1856, 1902, 1912
source

Sadly in that timeline, profit has always mattered more than humanity (or the planet).

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 2 points 2 years ago

Still does.

[–] Erika2rsis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Stage 1: "Climate change is my responsibility to fix as an average citizen!"

Stage 2: "Actually, fixing climate change is the responsibility of the megacorporations causing it."

Stage 3: "Climate change is my responsibility to fix as an average citizen!" (said while researching sabotage and mutual aid)

[–] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

You're missing an important step.

There's denial, then acceptance but brushing off blame, and then accepting blame but with apathy.

"OK fine, climate change is real, and it is caused by humans, but there's nothing we can do about it, so by bother?"

[–] rustyricotta@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The mastermind behind all this must be building fallout vault-like structures to allow people to survive the planet when all is said and done. They will rule the world in the end, perform experiments, whatever they want.

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The timeline for the earth to cool back off is a hundred thousand years. A bit too long to wait out in a bunker.

[–] Reverendender@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Not with that attitude

[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I actually got a long ad on YouTube recently for luxury bunkers equipped with everything to go on for decades no matter what's going on outside. So yeah, that's a business now.

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

What the hell is a luxury bunker?

Gold plated vault doors? Red carpet? Fancy mini bar soaps?

[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

There should definitely be a BP stage in there too

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Now we're in the "take your Xanax while daddy Bill Gates fixes everything for you" phase.

[–] funktion@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We're in the "make no plans for the future because the ocean is no longer producing enough oxygen and there's no way to reverse it" phase. People being born right now might see the end of humanity as we know it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What really sucks is that we are penalizing newer, greener technologies in order to prop up older non-profitable technologies.

There is a huge subsidy in the US for coal power plants. That needs to wind down, preferably in the next 4 years.

A few states charge higher registration fees for hybrid and electric vehicles, while at the same time suppressing or almost eliminating the gas tax during post-pandemic inflation.

Certain groups are dead set on boiling the the frog here, without even realizing that they are a lobster in the same pot of water.

[–] JeffCraig@citizensgaming.com 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The worst part is that renewables and EVs are generally just better in every way.

Just because they don't go vroom vroom, a majority of the population don't like them.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Inb4 some idiot goes "but it takes metal mined from places and shipped across the ocean to make Teslas!!!"

Like your Ford Raptor is sustainably grown and harvested in small-plot ecologically friendly mom and pop truck farms....

[–] TheLobotomist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago (4 children)
[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Right at the beginning of Oops...

[–] shitescalates@midwest.social 12 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Missing section: "OK its real and man made, but the fix is too inconvenient"

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

“This is because you didn’t recycle enough!”

[–] fear@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'll admit it, it was me. I mixed my paper with plastic. Sorry everyone.

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 years ago

You doomed us! DOOMED!

[–] AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social 10 points 2 years ago

Won't someone please just once consider the profits

load more comments (1 replies)

Stuck in traffic huffing Exxon's fumes.

[–] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I think we're currently in the "oops" phase heading towards "fuck"

[–] demlet@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

My personal human timeline:

  • End of dark ages up to industrial revolution: Wow, people are getting pretty dang smart, things are looking good for humanity.

  • Industrial revolution up to present: Well, on second thought...

[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 2 points 2 years ago

I don't care if it is caused by humans or natural causes ( and it's likely both). The issue is that it's a problem, because we've evolved to live in a cool environment (relative to wherever this is going). Part of responsibly using this planet we find ourselves on is terraforming it to sustainably and efficiently suit our needs. I support decarbonization because it helps. But due to other natural factors effecting our environment for the worse (as far as we as a species are concerned), we will need to take more artificial measures to cool the planet in the future.

But the first step is decarbonization. We have two choices - accept natural inefficiencies and extreme conditions, and slowly lose our intelligence in exchange for resilience (evolutionary "crabification"), or terraform the planet to a constant, efficient environment to continue developing as an intelligence.

We are caught, environmentally, in a neutral zone between extreme fluctuations that will continue until the earth cools entirely from its formation. We did not exist during the last extreme. And if we do not prevent the next, our species will not survive.

load more comments
view more: next ›