this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
52 points (96.4% liked)

Europe

6326 readers
707 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived link

The General Court of the European Union found that the European Commission was wrong to restrict access to COVID-19 vaccine purchase contracts to citizens, in a decision handed down on Wednesday (July 17).

Between 2020 between 2021, and 2023, the Ursula von der Leyen Commission signed contracts with several pharmaceutical companies, including Pfizer, Moderna, and Astra Zeneca, to purchase COVID-19 vaccine doses.

In January 2021, five Green MEPs – Margrete Auken, Tilly Metz, Jutta Paulus, Kim van Sparrentak and the late Michèle Rivasi – asked the Commission for access to these contracts, in the name of the public interest.

However, the Commission published the contracts in a redacted version. As a response, the MEPs decided to take their case to the Luxembourg-based court.

On Wednesday, the court announced its findings, “The Commission did not give the public wide enough access to the contracts for the purchase of COVID-19 vaccines.”

The court criticised the “partial” refusal by the Commission to disclose the details of members of the negotiating team on grounds of privacy.

“It was only by having the names, surnames and details of the professional or institutional role of the members of the team in question that they could have ascertained whether or not the members of that team had a conflict of interests” the press release reads.

all 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old