this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2024
268 points (94.1% liked)

interestingasfuck

1827 readers
1 users here now

Please go to !interestingshare@lemmy.zip

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 130 points 10 months ago (2 children)

A thousand years from now it will be an uncompleted and abandoned project that looks like Stonehenge. People will theorize about why it was built and what it was for.

[–] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 45 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)
[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Considering our current trends, I wouldn't be so sure...

[–] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I did say plausible, not necessarily likely

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

1200th anniversary

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Will it though? "Oh, this is where they put spare concrete blocks. You can tell it wasn't for religious purposes or telling the seasons because it's so uninteresting."

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The issue is that it will stay flat for a long time. If the second layer of blocks started earlier, it would be more obvious that its an art thing.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 59 points 10 months ago (5 children)

This is being built in the town of Wemding which celebrated its 1,200 year anniversary in 1993. The idea was to build something that would take 1,200 years to complete in order to emphasize how long the town has been in existence. People saying its stupid or going to be abandoned are forgetting the town itself has existed for longer.

[–] Johanno@feddit.org 16 points 10 months ago

While the town is that old I promise you that almost nothing looks like it was 1200 years ago. Maybe they can hold on that tradition 100 years but at some point the people won't bother. Need more space or don't see the point of it anymore

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

How about that concrete doesn't last that long?

Regardless, it just a pr piece for the town, so whatever.

*well not the concrete they're likely using, anyhow.

[–] Entropywins@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

There are still Roman buildings made of concrete standing....

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Roman concrete is very different from modern concrete. It was made with a few different ingredients that made salt water strengthen it, as opposed to weaken it, and lime class (among other things) helped it "self heal" cracks.

Roman concrete is why I put the * comment, but no one uses it anymore. Between it being a lost recipe for a while and it taking longer to "set" no one throwing up buildings or laying out roads cares that something lasts over 100 years anymore.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 months ago

Doubt they will use the same concrete recipe used in highways.

They most likely already thought about and solved that particular problem.

[–] sparkle@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

We know the recipe for Roman concrete, and we have better concrete recipes. This absolutely can last longer than Roman concrete.

It's self healing because of the poorer mixing, undissolved quicklime (calcium oxide) would remain in the concrete, and water getting in cracks would dissolve it and produce calcium hydroxide, which then combines with carbon dioxide to form more limestone aggregate (calcium carbonate) to heal the cracks.

There's a survivor bias when it comes to really old buildings of course so it's likely we're only seeing a small portion of the surviving buildings from that era.

We could make concrete that lasts multiple times the amount of time as Roman concrete, but we usually don't because it's more expensive (and modern construction seems to be about minimizing costs as much as possible and not worrying about anything more than a few decades out)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

One is a town and the other thing is random concrete blocks. Yeah, they are equally useful

[–] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 2 points 10 months ago

That's a nice thought but will the town actually still exist if the population doesn't? Humans have maybe 120 years left, there's zero chance of humans finishing this pyramid.

Although if a weird little art installation in a small German town is what gets capitalism to end, I'm all for it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mojave@lemmy.world 54 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Matt Parker has a video explaining how this art installation didn't actually do the math right, and the pyramid is one cube off.

In 1200 years it will end with missing one piece lmao

[–] cordlesslamp@lemmy.today 21 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Yup, "off by 1" mistake. How does nobody noticed that during the planning phase? And it's the German no less, aren't they supposed to be super good at these kind of things?

[–] freeman@feddit.org 13 points 10 months ago

You are not gonna believe this, but not all germans are the german stereotype.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 10 months ago

Maybe that's the "art?"

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 10 months ago
[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago (2 children)
[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 48 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 3 points 10 months ago

Goddamend time travelers , ruining the future for us!

[–] SurpriZe@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What graphical visualization software did you use? And which programming language drew this?

[–] FireTower@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Screen shot and YouTube.

See the link cows are underrated posted in this comment section.

[–] SurpriZe@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago (3 children)

What an uninspiring and uninteresting final product that effort will produce. Not worth the wait.

[–] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

I think it's already interesting. You can already see the difference in age on the existing blocks, and the difference will only grow with each decade of the project. I think the contrast between the first and final blocks would make a striking sight and poignant point about how something we might consider permanent within a single lifetime, concrete, really really isn't.

The project also doesn't require that every block be concrete. The material can be whatever, and as such, future blocks, and then past blocks, may come to represent the major construction methods of their times.

As an art-installation that makes me contemplate the past, the future, and the passing of time, I'd consider it successful starting on the day the first block was put down.

Whether it becomes complete one day, or is abandoned somewhere along the way, the piece has, and will have, a lot to say about the relationship that humans have with time.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

Agreed. Given a budget of a few million I could hire a team to build something twice as impressive in a month or two.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 25 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Sounds like they just made the same mistake I did when I hired my contractor.

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 23 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] kionite231@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Could you please provide transcript of the video in case people don't want to visit YouTube?

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Basically what they did was the following. Each concrete block represents 10 years. They get placed when another decade ends/starts(not to sure). So the problem is the following: when the 1200 years are over they have only placed 119 blocks so the building will be finished in 1210 years. Its the same as with a fence. If you have e.g. 10 Elements of a fence you need 11 posts. The ones who designed this building however didnt count the fence posts(the concrete blocks which mark the end of a decade) and I stead counted the "fence elements" causing the whole thing to be off by 10 years.

[–] match@pawb.social 4 points 10 months ago

shit man if they're only 10 years late on a public works project they'll still be average

[–] towerful@programming.dev 19 points 10 months ago

Also, it already has a mistake https://youtu.be/FAdmpAZTH_M

[–] match@pawb.social 18 points 10 months ago

while that seems like a long time for Germany to build The Pyramids it's actually only 12 turns and the free granary in every city will really help in the early game

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 15 points 10 months ago

I think the issue is the time span between blocks. Had they done a 1200 block, once a year thing, it would "feel" like progress and something to participate in regularly, even if you will never see the majority of it. Geometrically with the same design to get 1200 blocks I came up with a base of 19 blocks, then every odd number, skipping 11 and 3.

[–] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 8 points 10 months ago
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

We'll wipe ourselves out before this can be completed.

[–] Davidjjdj@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Long before...

[–] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›