this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
483 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

71842 readers
5496 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 176 points 8 months ago (4 children)

I don’t play this game. I buy my own unlocked phone and find prepaid cell service at a fraction of the cost.

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 28 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 13 points 8 months ago (4 children)

It won't last, oligopolies are buying out mvnos to consolidate further. Maybe anti trust fear will halt them but doubtful.

[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

The planet won't last. I just have to make sure my cell coverage is cheap until society collapses.

Ten-twenty years?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ObstreperousCanadian@lemmy.ca 9 points 8 months ago

One of the three carriers in Canada is about to do away with prepaid entirely in December. That said, I have a pretty affordable monthly plan and I buy my phones outright.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Is it not normal that you can use any phone with any abonnement?

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but some carriers lock the phones they sell so they only work with their subscriptions.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] M600@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Why is prepaid service cheaper? I never understood why plans cost more. You would thing it would be the opposite.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Some reasons:

  • prioritized traffic - if towers are congested, carrier customers get priority over prepaid customers
  • name brand recognition - most have heard of Verizon, T-Mobile, or AT&T, few have heard of Tell, Ting, or RedPocket
  • financing - you can get "free" upgrades from bigger carriers, whereas I pay cash w/ my prepaid service
  • features - most big carriers support roaming (sometimes international roaming), whereas those tend to be ala carte w/ prepaid

In short, you get a bit more hassle w/ prepaid, but you get a lot of savings. I pay <$10/month for my service (1GB data, unlimited text, 300 minutes call), and I could get unlimited everything for $25-30 (depending on prepaid carrier). I bought my phone for <$400, whereas cost is less of a concern for big carriers since they often offer financing issues. I hate monthly payments, so I prefer to buy devices in cash and keep my monthly service payments low.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Plus the bills are paid up front. No collections department, or write-offs. Plus you get to earn interest if the customer pre pays multiple months or a year in advance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Because prepaid customers get lower priority on the tower. If I'm in even a moderately crowded area, my connection speeds go to shit and nothing loads.

[–] gray@pawb.social 4 points 8 months ago

Money up front vs people just not paying the bill at the end of the month.

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 101 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Basically, AT&T argues against it saying it’ll force them to innovate and be competitive with other services.

Won’t anyone think of the poor telecom shareholders??

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 8 months ago (1 children)

All I see with that statement is, "Please Federal Government, hit me with your breakup hammer."

[–] ReverendIrreverence@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

hit me with your breakup hammer...

hard

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 83 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

https://crtc.gc.ca/eng/contact/phone/q19.htm

Canada:

First, locked phones are a thing of the past. Effective December 1, 2017, service providers will have to offer unlocked devices to their customers.

What are the benefits of having an unlocked device?

An unlocked device can be used on other networks, which means that you will be able to switch providers and keep the same phone. That means more flexibility for you, the consumer.

[–] can@sh.itjust.works 49 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I want to reiterate this. Even second hand phones. Find the carrier and call them. They legally have to oblige.

[–] DannyBoy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

I remember trying to do this when this first became law. Bell told me no anyways.

[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 3 points 8 months ago

Same! Except it was Koodo. Told me that they were “exempt” from the ruling.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 82 points 8 months ago (16 children)

Just make carrier locking illegal and have customers pay the actual price, now it's just hidden costs to the consumer.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 18 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Out of curiosity, I would imagine that if someone goes the carrier-financing route, they'd still be on the hook for the cost of the phone even if they jumped to a different carrier? I don't want to sound like I'm in support of at&t, but it doesn't seem terribly unreasonable to keep a customer in place while they still have a balance on the hardware, or is there something else I'm missing?

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Yeah. I always saw it as a trade-off. "Here's a cheaper or zero interest loan for a phone. You get this in exchange for paying us a cell phone bill for the next year or two."

What pusses me off is that none of the big three give any discount if you have your own phone. If the guy next to me gets $600 off his cell phone purchase and pays $80/month, how come I still pay $80/month with my own device?

[–] ODuffer@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Wow, I pay £10 a month for unlimited calls/text and 45GB data. Not even on contract, it's a monthly rolling bill, I can cancel at any time. The reason for this, there's pretty good competition between carriers/NVMOs in the UK at the moment, driving prices down.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] darkmarx@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I agree with what you're saying. They got the phone from Carrier A with the expectation the phone plan went with it. Once the phone is paid off, they can take the phone to Carrier B. Since they phone is basically bought on an interest free loan, the interest is recouped by the plan, and the collateral for not paying is a loss of the phone plan and use of the phone. To leave the plan, payoff the phone.

That does require that, the moment the phone is paid off, it should be automatically unlocked. There shouldn't have to be a request or additional waiting. And the customer should be notified that it's unlocked along with an explanation that they can now use the phone with any other provider.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago

Automatic unlocking sounds like a pipe dream given the American business landscape, but there shouldn't be any barriers to unlocking, even if the customer has to request it. People are likely stuck in the mindset of yesteryear where phones weren't transferrable between carriers (especially with band compatibility of GSM vs CDMA), and I'd wager that many people don't even realize it's possible these days. I can't say I blame carriers for wanting to maintain the illusion, and I don't necessarily think they should be forced to advertise it, but the option should be plain and simple for those who want to exercise the right.

[–] mark3748@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

They automatically unlock it once it’s paid off. They have a disclaimer that it needs to stay on the network for 60 days after it’s paid off, but I think that’s a CYA because mine was unlocked within a day of the last payment.

I just checked and I have 6 unlocked phones on my account and never requested any of them.

[–] elvith@feddit.org 3 points 8 months ago

I’m not from the US, but where I live it’s either (or a combination of):

  1. Your contract runs for two years. You can cancel it before, but still have to pay for the first two years. Often prices depend on which category of phone you want (say 20€/month for the service, 25€ with a “smart” phone, 30€ with a “premium” phone, 35€ with a “power” phone,…)
  2. You have two separate contracts, one for your phone, one for the mobile service. In this case you might pay for your phone 24 months, or 36, or whatever you agreed on and you can cancel the mobile service independently (assuming it’s not also locked to 2 years)
  3. Some carriers even allow you to only get a phone without a contract for the mobile service.
  4. If you finance a phone with your carrier, they’re legally bound to tell you what you pay for your phone monthly and how much for the service - there are many ways around that, unfortunately…

In any case, you get an unlocked phone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Like when you buy the thing sooner? Cuz we would remove all the bloatware they add. They used to do that to computers and we just stopped buying those shit things and building our own.

[–] Awesomo85@sh.itjust.works 11 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Shit man. I used to work at a Circuit City at the height of bloated shitty Celeron PCs.

We would be forced to sell a "system optimization" on each PC we sold. It was just a script that uninstalled a few of the bloatware items and tweaked the animation speed to make the customer think we did something incredible.

I fucking hated that job!

[–] FangedWyvern42@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That’s just straight up a scam

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I made a lot of money when I had a shop reloading machines. After a clean install without all the crap the manufactures and some of the stores installed the customer was happy with the speed increase.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EddoWagt@feddit.nl 5 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is about network unlocking and not bootloader unlocking

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SuspiciousPumpkin421@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This literally happened to me recently. Was going to Germany for 2 weeks and wanted to use a cheap eSIM for data only. I asked them if they could unlock my phone so I could do this, and they said no since it’s not paid off. I still have a new months left to pay it off, and didn’t wanna drop $250 to do that so I just had to pay the international data plan. $12(maybe $10? Can’t remember) a day, 10 day maximum charge per cycle so I’ll pay $120 for mine and $60 for my partners. Instead of the $11 30gb data plan I wanted. I’m never buying a phone from a carrier again, I will always just buy it outright from now on. It was a stupid situation.

Also the data roaming sucked, each time we moved from one provider network to another we had to restart our phones as the data didn’t wanna work…

[–] bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

A burner phone with a hotspot would have been cheaper.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

This is the way. Go buy a cheap phone when you get there and screw AT&FEE

[–] ECB@feddit.org 4 points 8 months ago

Personally I always always buy phones with two sim slots. It's super practical if you travel semi-often.

Idk about apple, but basically all of the mid-range androids have this feature. I guess this is about the US though, so it's probably Apple.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Capitalist companies can be awfully communist when it comes to our cellphone.

[–] Fogle@lemmy.ca 11 points 8 months ago

It'll lead to higher prices meaning they'll charge more lol

[–] progandy@feddit.org 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Meanwhile Australia is going to fore carriers to disconnect customers with devices that are not guaranteed to support emergency calling over volte. As there are still unsolved problems with detecting that, the providers fall back to only allowing devices they provided themselves.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

god I hate how the government acts like smartphones need to call. smartphones are able to be used as computers and should be treated as such.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FluorideMind@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

When I bought my current phone they sent me one that was locked. I called at&t to try and get it resolved and they told me to pound sand because I'm not a customer. Huge ordeal that could have been solved in 2 minutes.

load more comments
view more: next ›