this post was submitted on 09 Dec 2024
383 points (95.9% liked)

conservative

1510 readers
33 users here now

A community to satirize conservtive and right-wing "ideals".

This community (now) exists as a pressure valve, a place to process through humor the often frustrating world of conservative politics. Above all, this is NOT the place for serious conservative support/viewpoints/arguments. There are other places on Lemmy for that if you desire it.

Rules:

  1. Always follow .world instance rules

  2. Parody With Purpose: This is a space for humorous takes on conservative politics. We welcome satire, but draw the line at content that promotes racism, sexism, homophobia, or other forms of bigotry.

  3. Memes Over Manifestos: This community focuses on humor and parody, not serious political debate. There are plenty of spaces for earnest conservative discussion, this isn’t one of them.

  4. Highlight Contradictions: Sometimes the best content points out inconsistencies and hypocrisies in conservative talking points. Creative commentary is encouraged.

  5. Public Figures Fair Game: Politicians and pundits can be satirized, but no targeting of private individuals, doxxing, or harassment.

Children of public figures under the age of 14 are also off-limits, a 16 year old has enough free agency to break with or adopt their parents views. An 8 year old kid doesn't.

  1. No News Zone: Memes only, news or other serious content should be sent to the nearest relevant comm. Meme's of current events, however, are encouraged.

  2. Clear Satire: Make your satirical intent reasonably clear. We’re here to mock bad ideas, not accidentally spread them. If you're unsure how it will be taken, feel free to DM the mod team ahead of time or explicitly tag it as satire in the body.

A note on ChadMcTruth: Chad's content is 100% satire, but his work can sometimes be hard to tell, but if he posted it be assured, its satire.

  1. Relevant Content: All posts should relate to conservative politics or ideologies in some way somewhere in your post. Either in the title or the meme itself.

For more general political memes please see !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

  1. Community Respect: Disagree with fellow members all you want, but personal attacks aren’t welcome. Save the criticism for the ideas, not each other.

  2. Moderation Discretion: Mods will use reasonable judgment in applying these rules. We’ll be fair, but firm. These kinds of comms have a tendency to get off the rails, so we might seem overzealous in moderation sometimes.

  3. For the moment, i'm allowing properly tagged NSFW content as long as its funny and relevant. Don't make me regret it.

And above all, HAVE FUN!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 96 points 6 months ago

it's not fraud when their side does it.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 37 points 6 months ago (2 children)

So those respondents are saying when a Democratic president is in power, election results are fair, and when a Republican president is in power, the election results are suspect?

[–] Shortstack@reddthat.com 28 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They're saying the opposite.

Because trump kept lying about losing in 2020 and an astounding number of low information republican voters believed it, but now that he won, the murmers of fraud have fallen off a cliff. Because trump won this time.

[–] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Read closely, he said it correctly, he was talking about who was the sitting president when the election was held.

[–] Shortstack@reddthat.com 9 points 6 months ago

To be fair it could be interpreted both ways, now that you mention how else that could be read.

In that way of reading it, pretty damning about faith in one party vs another

[–] barrygoldwater@lemmy.wtf -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Lemmy definitely thinks that now! lol

[–] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 20 points 6 months ago

For anyone's reference, here is the study: https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/12/04/voters-broadly-positive-about-how-elections-were-conducted-in-sharp-contrast-to-2020/ ^[1]^

References

  1. "Voters Broadly Positive About How Elections Were Conducted, in Sharp Contrast to 2020". Pew Research Center. Published: 2024-12-04. Accessed: 2024-12-09T07:48Z. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2024/12/04/voters-broadly-positive-about-how-elections-were-conducted-in-sharp-contrast-to-2020/.
[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

Entitled shit stains.

[–] steelrat@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago
[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Stupid person:

  • Has theory
  • New data comes in
  • Changes theory
[–] teslasaur@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

That is literally the scientific method.

I think you meant something else, but it comes across as anti-science.

What they have is a false premise, built on nothing, nothing changed, still changes hypothesis after the outcome fall in line with their belief.