this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
1096 points (99.1% liked)

Funny

11942 readers
1434 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 139 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That train will just keep coming. Once such a freight train is going you better get out of the way. The amount of kinetic energy that's coming towards you is dwarfing compared to a measly tank.

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (6 children)

A train of 8000 tons at a velocity of 30 km/h roughly has the kinetic energy of 66.39 kg TNT.

Supposedly 100 kg TNT

[–] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

~~I don't think your units make sense


kinetic energy has units of energy, but "kg TNT per second" is power (about 4MW). (I think just remove the "every second" and it's correct?)~~

Edit: parent edited comment.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 116 points 10 months ago (2 children)

this sub doesn't exist on Lemmy :(
i miss r/bitchimatrain

[–] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 61 points 10 months ago

Sounds like it's time to create it!

[–] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 45 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Be the change you want to see in the world! Don’t let your dreams be dreams!

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but if you're gonna create it, you have to post to it like once a week or it'll just sit there dead, forever.

And who wants to find something to post once a week? Can't I just have Facebook feed it to me. Picture Zuck saying "here comes the plane!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jve@lemmy.world 69 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Sorry for Reddit watermark… couldn’t quickly find it elsewhere.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 52 points 10 months ago (3 children)

that is literally the worst watermark I've ever seen in my entire time on the internet, more than a quarter century now.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 14 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Why is there a Reddit watermark at all!? They didn't create the content, and I doubt Mr. Watterson would want it to be hosted there. Did a redditor go out of their way to slap that over the last panel? Like you said, the absolute worst...

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I made this.jpg

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You've obviously not seen some of the footage coming out of Ukraine war. They watermark over the entire video

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

don't you know how much bank CNN made out of the gulf war? gotta protect the copyrights of war footage

[–] bpev@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

For your consideration, the Calvin and Hobbes Search Engine: https://michaelyingling.com/random/calvin_and_hobbes/

Edit to show example search for “freight train”: https://michaelyingling.com/random/calvin_and_hobbes/search.php?phrase=freight+train

I didn’t make this site, I just find it to be very useful for this extremely niche use case 🤣 Although, weirdly, it seems to be linking the wrong strip for this particular one. Dunno why, I’ve never seen it do that before.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 53 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Here you go.

South Carolina in September. Low-slung trailer got stuck at the crossing and the driver skedaddled right before the impact. Also, ever so sadly, it doesn't officially count as a tank, only self-propelled artillery.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I expected more damage on the train. It really didn't give a fuck.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I think less and less damage to either side as armor and structural integrity increase is probably the norm with trains. For example non armor vehicles are turned into fun metal tangles. This 30 ton "lightly" armored vehicle looks pretty intact. A 70 ton tank might just remain more intact as the train shunts it to the side. The train might take more superstructure damage but there's a lot of just solid metal pushing in one direction. So I don't think any impact like that is ever going to actually just destroy the train.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago

The armor is light, the vehicle isn't.

On the other hand, a pair of locomotives can easily be over 400 tons, and that's not counting the rest of the train. Those doublestacked shipping containers on a well car can add 100 tons each.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I was wondering how a tank ended up on a railway track.

[–] Slovene@feddit.nl 5 points 9 months ago

It was training for battle.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Kinda looks like an M1A1 Abrams to me

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

That is 100 percent a pally. Abrams don't have rear doors.

[–] wjrii@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Nah, it's got that extra flat butt and long overhang with the basket thing on the back of the turret. The news report also said it's a Paladin, though this video is also showing off midsize-market local American news, so I wouldn't have trusted it on its own.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 45 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

Why don't we use trains on battlefields? (I see no issues with this plan)

[–] leisesprecher@feddit.org 64 points 10 months ago (3 children)

You could even wrap the tracks around the train so it can go wherever it wants!

[–] scoutFDT@lemm.ee 32 points 10 months ago (2 children)

That's just a tank with extra steps

[–] el_abuelo@programming.dev 14 points 10 months ago

No there are no steps. And even if there were the wraparound tracks would be able to go up them due to their circular nature.

[–] anzo@programming.dev 13 points 10 months ago

Make a lengthier tank? Like a centipede!!

[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Cereal is actually a kind of soup.

And tanks are technically a type of train.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

A small train that carries its tracks with it wherever it goes?

A better question is whether a self-propelled artillery "train" is a tank.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] count_dongulus@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Considering tanks are transported by train, not surprising. Train big.

[–] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 23 points 10 months ago

This is for sure gta

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Well that's an M109 Paladin. It weighs about half as much as an actual tank. But if it was fully loaded there's a pretty good chance nobody wins because it's an artillery system and it carries a lot of stuff that goes boom.

I don't care to speculate on who wins between a 70 ton tank and a train. It probably depends on what the train is pulling.

Edit to add - also we need pictures from different angles. From this angle it looks like the Paladin might have simply been de-tracked. But I'm pretty sure there's more damage as it's armor is actually comparatively light, rated for small arms and shrapnel.

[–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

So it's more self-propelled artillery?

[–] _bcron@midwest.social 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Technically yeah, colloquially no sane person would judge another for calling such a thing a tank

[–] luciferofastora@lemmy.zip 3 points 10 months ago

Nah, I don't judge people for being wrong or inaccurate, particularly when the colloquial use of a term is as firmly established. Ideally, people would still know the distinction, and I'd prefer to have journalists be accurate at least, but mostly I care about knowing what's technically correct myself. I don't need to be a pedant, I just don't want to be ignorant.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

That's exactly what it is.

[–] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago (2 children)

🇺🇸This is America🇺🇸

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Attention dispatch... There has been a mass shooting at the site of the Tank Train collision, but thankfully all victims have successfully had their medical claims for woundcare denied. Time to go home...

Top Gun theme blares as the Police Mustang drives off into the sunset. And... scene.

[–] Retrograde@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Worthy of a South Park bit

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] boywar3@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Isn't that a self-propelled artillery piece? I wanna say like an M109 or something

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

It looks like the tank returned fire.

load more comments
view more: next ›