this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2025
431 points (98.9% liked)

memes

18121 readers
1486 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 77 points 10 months ago (2 children)

please just burst already.

[–] TwoBeeSan@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Been edging this bubble for years

It's gonna be NICE

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] gerbler@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

New York stock exchange

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Now imagine how people who've waited for the bitcoin bubble to burst feel

[–] wdx@feddit.org 13 points 10 months ago

Me waiting for the housing market: 💀

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 42 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Every single company pouring money into the incinerator is positive they'll be the one to crack actually useful AI or even actual GAI.

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 27 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I mean LLMs are already very useful when used correctly, it's just 98% of the time they aren't used correctly

[–] felixwhynot@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (4 children)

How do I use it “correctly”

[–] gerbler@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

We used one to come up with a name for a feature cocktail at work. It's pretty good for that kind of stuff.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

"Correctly " is a term that has several different uses and meanings. Depending on the context, "Correctly" can mean:

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You use it for pointers and double check the results. I've had a lot of luck using it to explain terminology for complicated specialized tasks for trades work and stuff recently.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I had some files that i knew had duplicates, but didn't exactly match and while the filenames were not identical, you could tell by looking if they were the same.

Would have been very tedious to do all of them, LLM was able to identify a "good enough" number of duplicates and only made a few mistakes. Greatly sped up the manual work required to clean up the collection.

But that's so far from most advertised scenarios and not compelling from a "make lots of money" perspective.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Nah. They just believe it will make stock values increase (or that not doing thr AI thing will cause stock values to decrease).

Remember, a publically traded company produces shareholder value. How they do it doesn't matter.

[–] Venator@lemmy.nz 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Imagine how much more valuable alphabet stocks would be if they hadn't destroyed the core design and user experience of their search engine 😅

Most of the current value of AI comes from the fact that Google is useless now.

[–] nicknonya@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

i really really do not trust any of those cunts with agi.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 10 months ago

my only hope for AGI is that it gets open sourced and is easily runnable on sub $10,000 hardware.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 27 points 10 months ago (4 children)

How is Nvidia so high up the chart?

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 69 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The people selling the shovels made more money than the miners during the gold rush. It's the same thing here. If you want to do AI at any sort of scale, Nvidia is really your only choice because AMD and Intel sat on their hands for so long.

[–] Dagnet@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

All the profit, zero risk. Selling shovels is always better.

[–] HansGruber@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Except when no one wants shovels anymore.

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 4 points 10 months ago

That's the trick, people will always want shovels. Even after the gold rush ends, the only difference is demand for shovels goes back to normal, it doesn't disappear.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

It is a shock, but at least they received their money without being left holding the bag. They have a committed backlog over a year long, they seem to be avoiding manufacturing more than they have already sold ..

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 20 points 10 months ago

Ahh, right.

There are some legit use cases for AI, so they will no doubt make a decent amount of money in the future from it.

[–] BroBot9000@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

When the AI bubble burst, they've already made their cash selling shovels (being very anticompetitive) and walk away. Their startup competitors wither, and they are set for the next "thing."

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Anticompetitive? Nobody showed up to compete. Nvidia has been developing Cuda and AI tools for many years. AMD and Intel ignored the market segment because it was a niche market for so long.

[–] Xanthrax@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago
[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Pop that bastard asap

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

What I fear is, with Elongated Muskrat being dangerously close to the government and being invested in AI, we will get them immediately bailed out and/or consolidated into even less hands, even more deregulations, and maybe even some changes to copyright so it will expcilitly will allow not only the training on such material, but also the copyrighting of the output of generative AI.

[–] Henry@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago