EndeavourOS user reporting in. Where are the other two?

Steamos identifies itself as "SteamOS Holo".

Also, that article isn't measuring SteamOS in the first place. When you look at the steam survey with the default filters it won't list SteamOS. If you switch it to Linux only it will show SteamOS as 36.47% of Linux installs (0.84% of all steam installs) so it's clearly not feeding into the Arch percentages.

This is very obviously false. With the default filters with all OSs shown, Arch has 0.20% marketshare and Linux has a total of 2.29%. That means Arch is about 8.73% of all Linux systems in the survey. If you select the Linux only results, then SteamOS appears as its own entry, alongside a few others like Flatpak. We can see two things here:

• SteamOS Holo is 36.47%. This was very clearly not counted as a part of Arch Linux in the all OSs tab.
• Under these filters, Arch is even higher at 9.7%.

What's impressive here is not just the confidence with which you called the article dishonest and uninformed while not spending half a minute to check your false assumption, but also how many people upvoted you. This was trivial to prove wrong and in fact people have already done that below. Why are people so eager to believe the article is wrong that they will jump to agree with a blatantly wrong comment while having no knowledge of the situation themselves?

The only uninformed here is you, since SteamOS does not identify itself as Arch, but rather as SteamOS Holo and it does show separately from Arch on the stats.

Bazzite is by far my favorite linux so far and great for gaming

Minty Bois unite!

We like our shit boring and working. Lol.

6 hours of Monster Hunter: World today on my Mint desktop while my wife hunted with me on her Steam Deck!

If Mint would just implement HDR now, it would be my perfect system.

There are dozens of us!

I did not know nix users had time to game due to the hours messing around with their dot files hahaah

There's dozens of us!

I've had to do very little tweaking overall to get most games working, with the one notable exception being dragons dogma 2. The solution was proton GE and a new .nix file with GPU tweaks and now I'm getting slightly better performance than the average windows experience.

I must have joined the Arch community at the perfect time. I have been using it for probably over a decade and have had close to zero issues. AUR is amazing, and helpers make it even simpler. Only after using Arch for years did I understand that people have had serious issues with it in the past.

Once you're a bit familiar with linux, arch becomes much more user friendly due to the Arch wiki and it's wide coverage of topics. Knowing exactly what packages I need to use my Intel card to render with Blender is very handy. If you use a distro like EndeavorOS, you don't even have to do any special setup: it installs like any other distro.

lol, I'm sure you could just casually walk away from them in a serpentine pattern and avoid any harm. Likely they are too busy clearing Cheeto dust from their neck beard anyways.

There's at least two of us.

I've thought about Void. And LFS. And I submitted some packages for Alpine, although I'm not running it anywhere except as container bases.

Last time I really strayed from the Arch ranch was Artix, and that was TBH pretty painful on a day-to-day basis.

I'd like something like Arch but with less systemd. ChimeraOS looks promising, once it stabilizes. But how's Void treating you? How's xbps? I'm pretty in love with pacman; rolling release is a must, but IME you really only realize how good or bad a package manager is after it's too late, and you've been using it long enough to hit your first dependency hell/upgrade issue. After years of hell with RPM and deb, pacman was a godsend.

runit isn't my favorite initd alternative (dinit ftw, at the moment), but it beats systemd and I don't have a huge amount of experience with it. Do you like it?

Critical to me is being able to easily toss together package manager recipes for stuff that isn't in the official repo; I really believe in keeping systems clean by only installing through the package manager. Pacman packages are stupid simple to write and easy to work with, and yay makes things even better. How's xbps in this area?

EFS boot is easy? Stuff like btrfs boot partitions and snapper support easily available? No idiocy like trying to force users onto Wayland prematurely?

I've looked at Archcraft (not any of the others), and the only thing that seems unique about it is that it's riced (themed) out of the box and offers several DE options. Otherwise, there's not really anything that sets it apart from, say, EndeavorOS (which has a handful of DEs and a great install process) or CachyOS (which has a nice install process, an optimized kernel and packages, and as many or more DE options as Archcraft).

The other thing that gives me pause with Archcraft is the fact that it's maintained by only one person. What happens if/when they get burned out?