this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
1200 points (98.7% liked)

Gaming

5197 readers
913 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.


I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.


Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.



Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 19 points 5 months ago

They need to get comfortable with losing their company.

[–] donuts@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

Don't you mean.. AAAA company?

[–] GeneralEmergency@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago (10 children)

G*mers have already grown used to not owning their games. It's called Steam.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 15 points 5 months ago

Make stupid choices, suffer stupid consequences.

[–] Carighan@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I find it fascinating that they're supposedly going bankrupt.

Aren't they... big? Don't they have tons of assets? Shouldn't they be, still, sitting on a pile of cash?

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Big assets also means Big liabilities.

1bn of short term and 2bn of long term debt.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ubisoft is clearly a tone-deaf company. But that doesn’t change that this comment has been frequently cited in some very out-of-context ways.

For those who don’t know, the not-owning games comment was in reply to an investor asking why people were reticent to try out Ubisoft+, their monthly service that lets people play pretty much all their games. He was suggesting many people are not used to the option of mass rental as opposed to ownership. But, many Game Pass subscribers (at least before their price increase) can attest that when the value proposition is good enough, it is an appealing option, wherein you accept impermanent access to get more games. In that sense, he was right.

So far as I can see, the intent of the comment had nothing to do with people who buy “lifetime” copies of their games. There’s separate criticisms to make about poor online implementations leading games like The Crew to be yoinked, and I’m in favor of that regulation. But Ubisoft is hardly alone in the way they’ve mishandled that, and the quote had nothing to do with it. I feel like most people pointing to it have only a vague idea of what corporate greed it represents, as though CEOs just want a way to delete your library and somehow make money from it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eletes@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 months ago (9 children)

Man Ubisoft could be so great but they just land so meh. Watchdogs, tom Clancy wildlands, the division, farcry. They all have potential but just don't have that last 15%

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's because they fear giving that 15% out for free when they could have monetized it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Ubisoft Executives need to get comfortable not eating food anymore.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

I don't think i even play Ubisoft games, they can go down for all i care.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

And no one will learn anything from this.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (4 children)

It feels tragic. On the one hand, they made some of my most favourite games especially the Splinter Cell series, and it would be sad to see a once great developer to go. But then on the other, the greedy bastards deserve to go under for ruining some of my most favourite games including the Splinter Cell series.

But seriously though, if Ubisoft do go under, I hope that their IP would go into safe hands, like how Baldur's Gate franchise has been handed over from Bioware to the competent team of Larian (and I do hope Larian does not enshittify unlike the fate of other companies, such as Ubisoft and EA).

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Larian isn't making another Baldur's Gate.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

ubisoft needs to get comfortable with not existing.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›