this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
227 points (96.0% liked)

[Dormant] moved to !space@mander.xyz

10408 readers
1 users here now

This community is dormant, please find us at !space@mander.xyz

You can find the original sidebar contents below:


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

πŸ”­ Science

πŸš€ Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 108 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Where do I donate to help the asteroid?

[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 42 points 3 months ago (4 children)

This has been a good test of our planetary defense procedures, and will be an even better test on the off chance the probability resolves to 100%. I'm rooting for an impact trajectory, since we'd either get to see humanity's first real asteroid deflection or witness the largest asteroid impact in over a century. (Hopefully in the ocean or a sparsely populated area!)

[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, I half expect that if we get a 100% chance, governments are going to see where it's going to land (sea/Africa) and decide it's not worth the spend/let's see what happens if we let it hit.

Really hope I'm wrong, but I don't have a lot of faith in humanity anymore.

[–] SamboT@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (7 children)

Why would we mitigate the asteroid if its cheaper to clean up after a non-consequential impact?

[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

To test our ability to stop it. If one was going to hit a major city, that's not the best situation to be trying something out for the first time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Eagle0110@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And hopefully it can be highly rich in rare minerals, so that when the ashes of WW3 finally settle down, at least the future generations of humans or not-human sapient entities will at least get something good out of the whole ridiculous mess we're currently in lol

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Unfortunately, at the speed they travel, an asteroid will be vaporised in the impact. Whatever rare earths there are will be scatter as a fine powder over a large area.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] knightly@pawb.social 13 points 3 months ago (3 children)

It's only a city-killer, but last I saw there were a few cities in the estimated impact area. Fortunately we'll get a better idea of whether it's going to hit in 2028. Plenty of time to launch a redirection mission or evacuate the danger zone.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 30 points 3 months ago (3 children)

3.1% odds are nothing to sneeze at. Ever played D&D?

[–] Suburbanl3g3nd@lemmings.world 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

XCom vets know what's about to happen

[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It'll climb to 95% and then phase through the earth to somehow miss entirely?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mousefad@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 months ago

roll for save vs. asteroid on a D30...

Balls.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 28 points 3 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Nutteman@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

Don't threaten me with a good time

[–] Uranus_Hz@lemm.ee 18 points 3 months ago (3 children)
[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (4 children)

A direct hit would be about the size of a fission nuclear bomb. Devastating for a city, but no regional or country-wide impacts, let alone globally

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not even a little global cooling?

As a treat?

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

If anything, it might get a tiny bit warmer

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

Good.

Up those numbers.

We're awful.

[–] Vaggumon@lemm.ee 15 points 3 months ago (4 children)
[–] kusivittula@sopuli.xyz 10 points 3 months ago

first hit moscow and take an insane bounce and hit washington DC please. that's all I'm asking.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It will be in 2032, so near the end of Trump's third term.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] socsa@piefed.social 8 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Bruh the DC metro area is statistically one of the most anti Trump places in the US. Let's root for it to hit Maralago instead.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

is this the aliens going "welp they elected Trump again time to press the reset button"

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This is the expected path the probability is going to take. Scott Manley made a great video on that.

Basically the area in which the asteroid is going to be includes the earth. When you shrink this area earth is going to take up more space, unless it left the cone. I.e. measurements increase the likelihood until they don't.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] subarctictundra@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago
[–] Sepix@feddit.org 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

As if fascists and climate change wheren't enough. Here, have an asteroid!

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 months ago

What if it lands an the fascists and dust in the atmosphere cancels climate change for a couple of decades. Could that work?

[–] sickday@fedia.io 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Would asking for it to both hit the Earth and for me to be right below the impact zone be asking too much?

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

Unless you are a terrible person, yes.

If it falls on a joint meeting of Trump and Putin who once again decided to have a meeting to discuss Ukraine without Ukraine that should be fantastic, and not at all asking too much. Hopeful musk is hanging out with bezos and Netanyahu and Xi are talking too. Really not asking enough if you think about it

[–] vane@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

How many people need to die before someone hits the Earth with a rock ?

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί