this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
70 points (97.3% liked)

Privacy

31876 readers
1 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is this some sort of a convenience feature hidden behind a paywall to justify purchasing their subscriptions or does generating the codes actually cost money? If the latter is the case, how do applications like Aegis do it free of cost?

all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 49 points 2 years ago

It's a convenience feature upsell, the calculations happen locally.

[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 46 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

That's just an excuse to charge more. TOTP is standardized in RFC 6238 and cost nothing to generate.

[–] flumph@programming.dev 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The "Product Led Growth" crowd doesn't care about charging based on what things cost. They only care about what the buyer will tolerate. The "value metric" that pisses me off the most is per user pricing when the service doesn't incur costs per user.

[–] amju_wolf@pawb.social 2 points 2 years ago

The “value metric” that pisses me off the most is per user pricing when the service doesn’t incur costs per user.

Even in cases where there is a cost per user (or there is at least a correlation in cost increase with number of users) the price is usually many orders of magnitude larger than the cost increase.

[–] turkalino@lemmy.yachts 4 points 2 years ago

On top of that, it takes no more than 5 lines of Python code to generate

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 35 points 2 years ago (1 children)

bitwarden does it behind a convenience fee, fair enough, its a worth while service to support. If you self host, you have no such barriers.

[–] TheButtonJustSpins 39 points 2 years ago

$10/yr to support BitWarden and get a few convenience features is something I'm cool with.

[–] nakal@kbin.social 29 points 2 years ago (1 children)

TIL password managers charge for 2FA.

  1. Get a free password manager.
  2. Get a free 2FA App. Please don't mix passwords and 2FA so you don't reduce it to 1FA.

For 1) I use PasswdSafe, because I can merge databases with Password Gorilla as I like.

For 2) I use Aegis. You can download an icon theme, which is quite cool.

[–] hh93@lemm.ee 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

For the 2nd point:

Mixing it doesn't reduce it to 1fa - it still makes your accounts immune to Passwort leaks and common attacks

You are only at a 1FA level if someone hacked your PW-Manager but in that instance you're most likely fucked anyway

Sure for the most important accounts having 2FA in another app is good so you can at least secure those if the PW-Safe leaked but I have 2FA on every single website I use(d) that offers it - even if I'm only on there once a year so using a special app is less important than just having the additional security in the first place

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 7 points 2 years ago

I usually call it 1,5FA since it is reduced to one factor, namely the password manager, but that password manager is protected by 2FA.

[–] amju_wolf@pawb.social 2 points 2 years ago

You are only at a 1FA level if someone hacked your PW-Manager but in that instance you’re most likely fucked anyway

As long as you at least have actual, separate 2FA for access to your recovery email(s) you should be more or less fine.

Unless you mean that if your password manager is compromised it probably means that your device is compromised, which also means that you're probably also a victim to a session hijack for the recovery email(s), in which case you are truly fucked.

You can also have a multi-level approach where for "higher value" accounts you have a separate password database so the more valuable accounts aren't exposed as much as everything else... There are definitely options.

[–] danileonis@lemmy.ml 25 points 2 years ago

It's free on KeePass, use syncthing to have personal libre cloud.

[–] ddnomad 23 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Please don’t use your password manager for TOTP tokens. It is called two factor authentication for a reason.

[–] beeb@lemm.ee 32 points 2 years ago (4 children)

The reason that 2fa exists is not to protect you if someone gets their hands on your device. It's to protect you if your "static" credentials leaked from a providers' database or you otherwise got phished. Using a password manager to handle mfa is totally reasonable.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 10 points 2 years ago

If you are really worried about the password manager being an intrusion vector, secure your vault with a hardware key.

[–] danileonis@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Agree. That's another reason to always suggest KeePass!

[–] Acters@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

You can be paranoid and split the two, but most people(99%) will be perfectly fine with KeePass.

[–] ddnomad 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It is reasonable yet subpar under a threat model where you do not trust any single provider, which is a model I find appropriate most of the time.

[–] amju_wolf@pawb.social 1 points 2 years ago

There are other ways your password database could leak. For example you could use a weak password, or it could leak in some way, and if you store it on a cloud service that also got compromised you'd be fucked without a compromised device.

But yeah, all these are much less likely.

[–] PrincipleOfCharity@0v0.social 22 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I feel like this needs to be pushed back on a little bit. Don’t let perfect be the enemy of the good. Having a password manager that provides good passwords and TOTP as a second factor is way better than only using a password.

Sure, it would be nice if you had two devices. A phone password manager and a usb security key, but for many people it is inconvenient to carry a security key to plug when you need it. I’d rather that person keep a TOTP on their phone in that case rather than not use two factor due to inconvenience.

Your concern is mostly about “what if someone steals your phone or computer” then they have both factors. However, your average person isn’t getting hacked by someone they know, and random local thieves aren’t typically sophisticated enough to do more than re-sell stolen computer equipment. The average person is getting hacked by some dude in a foreign country who dumped a password database or phished a password. That person isn’t stealing your device so the fact that both factors are in the same place doesn’t really mean anything.

Also, most password managers are locked by biometrics these days. In that case, it isn’t really the app that is the second factor. It is your fingerprint or face. Someone may steal your device, but if they can’t get into the password manager that needs a password and biometrics then they don’t have anything.

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's why I had my fingertips removed and stored in a secure location. If your fingers are still attached to your body, that's just like 1FA

[–] PrincipleOfCharity@0v0.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just wait until you learn that if you are going to use removed finger-tips then they don’t necessarily have to be your own…

[–] LinkOpensChest_wav@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago

Uhhhh ... c/unethicalLPT?

[–] ddnomad 1 points 2 years ago

You should not assume your password manager is unhackable.

That’s my main point. Perfect is an enemy of good indeed, but I feel that doing things properly the first time is a good idea in general, especially when it as easy as using a different app for your TOTP tokens. It’s a low hanging fruit really.

[–] authed@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I do that mainly for accounts I don't care about but either way it does increase security as compared to just a password in many cases..... I just wish that some of these services didn't require TOTP

[–] IanAtCambio@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago

Keepassxc and macpass do it for free

[–] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 12 points 2 years ago

If your password manager is charging for that get a new manager as almost all managers will do that for free

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Because the business model works that way.

Draw them in with features and lock the actual security features behind an additional pay wall.

Enterprise environments is rife with this kind of crap. Sso.tax lists some of the worse ones.

[–] nIi7WJVZwktT4Ze@fost.hu 5 points 2 years ago

It's completely open and it's just another fee you can pay. Switch to KeePass if you want restriction-free password management.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago

Keepassxc doesn't

[–] PublicLewdness@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

I use KeePassXC which doesn't charge a cent for this.

https://keepassxc.org/