this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
315 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

72865 readers
1916 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 129 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Can't comment on the rest but Firefox has already released a patch in their update.

[–] Bestet@lemmynsfw.com 23 points 2 years ago

The article states that chrome released a patch on Monday and others are following.

[–] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why in the hell is Nobara still on v114? Anyone know?

[–] rambaroo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Because it's a hobby distro and that's the kind of end result you should expect from those.

[–] RanchOnPancakes@lemmy.world 72 points 2 years ago (1 children)

oh no, guess we need to get rid of webp forever. Dang it.

[–] yoz@aussie.zone 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hope that trash google takes itself out .

[–] Kyoyeou@slrpnk.net 31 points 2 years ago (3 children)

May I Ask why people don't like webp? I don't know the reason? To my eyes now it is a more ecological way of having pictures because of their lower weight?

[–] Gawdl3y@pawb.social 45 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

It's a better format than JPEG, GIF, or PNG, while doing the jobs of all of those, but better (in most cases), and is an open format. It also has wide compatibility nowadays. The only major downside is a lot of social media services don't even think about it being a potential format due to a lack of awareness/wide usage, leading to a degraded experience when someone shares a WebP somewhere (lack of auto-embedding as an example). I suspect this is why it gets a lot of hate here, which is unfortunate because it's not at all the fault of the format.

AVIF (based on AV1) is the up-and-coming format that beats WebP in most cases now, but support isn't quite there yet (mostly due to Apple), and it has the same problems for social media as WebP. However, it doesn't have any true lossless mode AFAIK. HEIF (based on HEVC) is also good, but is heavily patent-encumbered and not as open. JPEG-XL is dope and potentially even better in some aspects, but has very poor support across the board.

[–] thedirtyknapkin@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago

one important tidbit in this whole situation that sheds a lot of light on where and why is adopted: webp is Google's horse, jpegxl is adobe's horse. that's why jpegxl has poor web support, and why webp pisses off designers.

[–] Dee@lemmings.world 9 points 2 years ago

I know I get annoyed by webp because Telegram processes it as a sticker instead of a normal image. That's my only gripe with it, but like you said that's more Telegram than the actual format.

[–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

AVIF only beats WebP for heavily compressed images and it doesn't beat it by much.

If you want high quality images - then WebP is way better than AVIF. And if you want a lossless image then AVIF is totally useless. Lossless AVIF files are often 2x or 3x larger than an uncompressed image. WTF.

Lossless WebP images can be as good as a quarter the size of an uncompressed source.

And as bandwidth improves and images don't really get much bigger (we're already at the limit of human visual perception for reasonable file sizes) for me that makes WebP a better compression algorithm than AVIF.

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social -2 points 2 years ago

IDK what you mean by lack of auto-embedding, the support for it has been pretty fantastic from the start. I literally learned about it because I was looking though supported formats for a library, and it's been in the list ever since

[–] Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is just me, but when I download a PNG I know it's lossless, when I download a jpeg I know it is lossy but probably a "photo-like" image, a gif? You get it.

One firmat to rule them all will get you badly compressed pixel graphics and unnecessary large "photo" images and so on, not because the format is bad, but if it lets you do so, people will (and companies obviously).

Most images on the internet are way under a MB, is there really that important to lower it slightly?

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Most images on the internet are way under a MB, is there really that important to lower it slightly?

It's because companies always want to include 100 or 200 or 1000 pictures, because of all the products they are selling, they want to sell them all and right away.

It's dumb, I hate it. lol

[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Proprietary formats are the bane of humanity. No one company, doesn’t matter, should have control over a file format. They should all be free and universally interoperable. A PSD, for example, should present and store data the same way if used on Photoshop or Pixelmator.

Companies are not your friends.

[–] Gawdl3y@pawb.social 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

WebP is not proprietary. It's an open format, is not patent-encumbered, and its reference implementation/libraries are open-source. It is driven mostly by Google, similar to Chromium.

[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They took the open source WebKit to develop Chrome and Chromium.

How did that turn out?

Google wants to own images. Doesn’t matter if they made the licensing whatever. They make webp. They have a personal vested interest in control.

You trust Google???

[–] abhibeckert@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

They took the open source WebKit to develop Chrome and Chromium.

How did that turn out?

Perfectly? Web browsers are way better now than they ever have been.

Google wants to own images. Doesn’t matter if they made the licensing whatever. They make webp. They have a personal vested interest in control.

WebP is a little better than PNG/JPEG and way better than GIF. That's all that really matters.

You trust Google???

Hell no. I reluctantly watch a bit of content that's exclusively available on YouTube. Don't use anything else of theirs and I'd drop YouTube in a heartbeat if I could find that content elsewhere.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You may have already noticed, or may soon notice when it slaps you in the face, that google is inserting proprietary code into their browser, into android, and every other product they produce.

Then, one day, you will find all that free open source labour they used to build their empire is no longer open source. They control the web. And you have no idea what they are doing. And if you decide not to continue using their product you will be unable to access sites and services due to Google's super duper friendly and only concerned for your wellbeing internet standards.

Google is evil.

Period.

[–] 3TH4Li4@feddit.ch 66 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I'd just say Chromium browsers and Firefox instead of 'other browsers'. Either way Firefox already put out a security fix so that's neat.

[–] stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago
[–] Nonononoki@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

WebKit based browser users: There are dozens of us!

[–] accideath@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

In Windows/Linux perhaps. There are far too few options. But combined, there are a lot of iPhones, iPads and Macs…

[–] TheDarkBanana87@lemmy.world 59 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Is it time for us to switch to JPEGXL

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 59 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Chrome removed support for it because they didn't invent it.

[–] HornyOnMain@kbin.social 86 points 2 years ago

In Google's defense, they're plenty willing to remove support for things they did invent!

[–] Desistance@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

Except they did invent it. They were on the development panel.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 5 points 2 years ago

Not like it would be any more secure.

[–] skullvalanche@lemmy.world 55 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Just came here to say that this also affects any applications that use the libwebp library.

That includes many apps that most people don't think of as "browsers".

Electron based applications all use chromium under the hood, and are quite common/prolific these days.

https://www.electronjs.org/apps

Expect updates to a lot of things in the near future.

[–] LaggyKar@programming.dev 22 points 2 years ago

Expect updates to a lot of things in the near future.

And also a lot of things that remain unpatched for years

[–] Spudwart@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 years ago

Welp, time to update my browser after months.

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org -4 points 2 years ago

Webp is literally AIDS.