this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
75 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

71143 readers
2970 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ipha@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (3 children)

TL;DR: incremental improvements and

maximum throughput of at least 30Gbps

lol no

[–] RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Well, if the router is within 1 meter, and there are no sunspots, and you drain the blood of a freshly castrated rooster into a silver bowl underneath your computer.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And not just any rooster. Wi-Fi AX supports a few varieties, but Wi-Fi 6 will require the blood of an Ayam Cemani rooster, the rarest breed, to power the argent energy required

[–] Sir_Simon_Spamalot@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

gotta get that black cock

[–] yopla@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

I heard WiFi 8 will come with a flexible antenna that you can connect directly to your laptop.-

[–] redcalcium@c.calciumlabs.com 3 points 2 years ago

Consumer grade routers with multiple 10gbps ethernet ports are very rare, and yet we'll have 30gbps wifi before 10gbps ethernet goes mainstream?

[–] Crow@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Certainly not on consumer routers thermal throttling at 5 connections.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

You're confusing consumer routers with cheap shit your ISP gives you for free. Buy a high end ASUS router and you won't have issues.

[–] simple@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Sounds very exciting for the 5 people that have an internet speed of higher than 1 gigabit

I'm joking, it's cool that we're starting to support this standard from now. The improved latency is interesting because I was always under the impression that the router is the bottleneck.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Or the people with local media servers with multiple terabytes worth of movies on it

[–] Greyson@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Be really cool if you could use a net to grab the data out of the air

[–] Osa-Eris-Xero512@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Nah, client radios have generally been the bottlenecks for a while now, at least since AC Wave 2, and particularly when they don't speak modern wifi and drag every station in range down with them.

Legacy clients are the worst.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Every monkey has a gigabit at home https://balticom.lv/lv/internets I mean €18 per month is not that expensive.

[–] Life_inst_bad@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Aux@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Oh wow, what's wrong with Germany? Even UK has it cheaper and UK traditionally has the most expensive internet in Europe due to some British Telecom monopoly issues...

[–] Life_inst_bad@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Germany has not only expensive internet it's also not reliable. Most of the problems seem to be historical and privatisation. Also the infrastructure is problematic, with most people not having even the ability to get gigabit connection. https://www.dslweb.de/internet-verfuegbarkeit.php

[–] RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Government thought it was a good idea to let a single company handle nearly all of our web infrastructure

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Now as an Estonian, I'm not a fan of occupation, but.... y'all down south have some nice internet pricing, would you like to annex us?

[–] riskable@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

Noooo! You guys are missing the big use case for WiFi 7: VR headsets

It's finally going to have the bandwidth to stream SteamVR to dual 4k-ish displays without hiccups in actually high definition (no noisy compression). Even if you have to dedicate a WiFi AP for the task it'll be vastly superior to the situation we have today which can suffer from significant lag spikes and poor quality.

I've done streaming VR with a dedicated Wifi 6 AP on my Quest 2 headset and the occasional lag spikes made games like Beat Saber unplayable (and I was only about 4-5 feet away from the AP).

[–] IgnoreKassandra@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

God damn, apparently they came out with six nee wifis while I wasn't paying attention.

[–] s0phia@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I just got WiFi 5 last year and you guys are already on 7 😰

[–] Maximilious@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Don't worry, the improvements between 5 and 6 are not really needed for home connections which is why I skipped it. WiFi 6 improvements were mainly around channel selection and wider bands to allow larger amounts of clients to connect to a single AP in a large campus environment. It could help at home, but only if you have a LOT of devices connected or have a lot of interference.

[–] jacktherippah@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Most people in my country use ISP-issued routers running on WiFi 4 and you guys are already on 7!?

[–] flexnsniff@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

I just upgraded to Wi-Fi 6 finally. Already amazed. Waiting to get fiber before I do any more network upgrades

[–] stevexley@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

Cries in Australian (25 Mbps)

[–] ShartyWaffles@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Babe, wake up - new wifi just dropped

[–] skillissuer@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

entirely new very wide mid-microwave band? call me luddite but i'll stay with 2.4 ghz for long range p2p links

[–] Calculate2093@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Wifi 7 can communicate with any given station (client) on all bands at the same time, so there's really nothing to complain about here.

Multi-Link Operation (MLO), a feature that increases capacity by simultaneously sending and receiving data across different frequency bands and channels. (2.4GHz, 5Ghz, 6GHz)

[–] skillissuer@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

if client supports this feature that is

these broadband and multiband antennas (6ghz band is like 20% wide) will require much better and more complicated designs with tighter tolerances than what you could find in 2.4/5ghz band devices

[–] SamB@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Stop it. You’re scaring the client devices.

[–] FlashZordon@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

I kinda figured that Wifi 7 was coming soon once my ISP started deploying Wifi 6 routers.

[–] QwertySpace@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It seems like with every WiFi update since the dawn of time, they've been "improving" speeds when multiple devices are connected. And yet, there's no noticeable improvement.

[–] QHC@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Similar to battery technology or parking lots, adding more capacity just means more is used. Less incentive to be efficient, too. The gaps get filled and it feels like nothing improved, but in absolute terms there definitely has been an upwards trend.

load more comments
view more: next ›