this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
214 points (96.5% liked)

politics

23720 readers
3097 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The remarks, confirmed to NBC News by two sources in a closed-door meeting, reflect renewed tension within the House Republican ranks as a government shutdown looms.

Frustration boiled over in a closed-door House GOP meeting Thursday morning when Speaker Kevin McCarthy all but dared his detractors to file the "motion to vacate" the speaker's chair and try to remove him.

In the meeting, McCarthy told House Republicans, “If you want to file a motion to vacate, then file the f---ing motion,” according to two sources in the room who confirmed the comments to NBC News.

It was a nod to members including Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., and others who are threatening to force him out of the speakership if he doesn’t comply with their demands, like putting certain bills on the floor and not passing a stopgap bill to prevent a government shutdown at the end of the month.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 75 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh yes. Please do.

Please show the world how fucking useless the GOP is.

[–] balderdash9@lemmy.zip 57 points 2 years ago

They're trying to impeach Biden and can't even keep the government running. Priorities first McCarthy, this is not a good look.

[–] Conyak@lemmy.tf 55 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You reap what you sow. The GOP embraced the MAGA lunatics because they wanted to win and didn’t care about the cost. Now they get to watch the party die because they have no way to control them and they are not reasonable.

[–] Taako_Tuesday@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago

I wish it would implode faster, I'm tired of these guys being in control of any part of the government

[–] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 39 points 2 years ago

“Kevin McCarthy does not let these things get underneath his skin.”

Pfft, if that were the case we wouldn't be here to begin with.

[–] MossBear@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

GOP creates MAGA. MAGA eats GOP. MAGA destroys itself.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

If Ouroboros was stupid and racist.

[–] Cobrachickenwing@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Force him out and let the Biden impeachment die or let him stay and be neutered for the rest of the session. Truly the greatest of choices for the MAGA caucus.

[–] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

~~caucus~~
Circus* FTFY

[–] AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Its quite telling how Modern Republicans act towards one another. If Thanos blipped everyone from politically communist to neoliberal tomorrow, they would find no peace. Their nature is to tear down others as its own end. They would eat each other.

There's a reason that when Democrats are in power they try like hell to avoid the subject of Republicans as they're trying to govern, yet when Republicans are in power all they can use their power pulpit to talk about is how evil the Democrats are.

[–] StarServal@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago

There is no honor amongst thieves. They’ll cooperate with each other as enemies of my enemies until they suddenly aren’t getting what they want, then it’s ‘No True Republican’ with them.

[–] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

LOL he knows that they might not be able to pick a new speaker willing to put up with their shit

[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Putin: "File the motion near the end of the month. Yes, right before any budget breakthrough."

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 7 points 2 years ago

Um, no other Speaker would have allowed themselves to be put in this position to begin with

[–] Spitzspot@artemis.camp 7 points 2 years ago

Your proposal is acceptable.

[–] Binthinkin@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

Yea guys cmon let’s get this going we want to see what we waste our money on. If we ain’t getting shitty weak displays from dick pill lovers in the GOP then I am not getting my money’s worth.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Among the things I don't usually say, "I agree with Kevin McCarthy" is the one I least expected today.

[–] whodatdair@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

And the bag of rats continues to writhe. Fucking eat each other you monsters.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


It was a nod to members including Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., and others who are threatening to force him out of the speakership if he doesn’t comply with their demands, like putting certain bills on the floor and not passing a stopgap bill to prevent a government shutdown at the end of the month.

Under current House rules, any one member can force a vote to vacate the speaker's chair, and it would take a majority of the chamber to remove him.

McCarthy oversees a narrow GOP majority, with only four defections to spare before needing Democratic help to pass legislation.

He added of the motion to vacate threats: “Kevin McCarthy does not let these things get underneath his skin.”

The root of the tension is aggressive demands by right-wing members who are insisting on spending cuts and policy add-ons to must-pass government funding legislation, which have no realistic chance of passing the Democratic-led Senate.

McCarthy was forced to punt Wednesday on a House vote to advance a defense funding bill, facing demands from right-wing members to show them a plan to satisfy their wishes.


The original article contains 443 words, the summary contains 185 words. Saved 58%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Nerrad@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Any one member of congress can force him out? Even a Democrat?

[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not force him out, they can force a vote for him to vacate the speaker's chair. The GOP made this new rule back in January. I suspect they thought they'd be able to use it bring the House to its knees if the Democrats regained power or some such nonsense. Or to keep Pelosi from getting it back if the Dems got a majority in 2024. Or just harass a Democrat speaker.

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

McCarthy agreed to it in order to become speaker, because the MAGAts wouldn't vote for him otherwise. They wanted it not for Democrats (who will just revoke the rule when they take control back) but to use as a cudgel against McCarthy exactly as they are doing now.

He weakened his position from the outset just to win, and now he's the most feckless speaker in history. Truly galaxy brain level politicking

[–] Poob@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So we saw the hilarious attempt to nominate McCarthy last time, but what happens if they boot him out and refuse to vote in a speaker for a much longer time? Is there any kind of mechanism in case it's deadlocked indefinitely?

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Either enough Republicans get fed up that they vote a dem into the seat, or congress starves to death. Win-win, really.

[–] mvilain@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Oh, wouldn't it be wonderful...
if Loren Bobert, George Santos, or MTG filed the motion?

[listening to my Julie Andrews in my OCR of MY FAIR LADY]

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

George is 100% behind Kevin. He made that choice on purpose, because he knows Kevin won't take any action at all against him as long as he is a reliable Speaker vote.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’m honestly having a fantastic time watching the Republican Party implode :D

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Me too, but also this is going to fuck a lot of people over if the government goes unfunded, and it doesn't look like they're going to figure it out. The only reasonable option currently seems to be any decent Republicans left side with democrats. I don't really see that happening, but who knows at this point?

At this point, I just assume the GOP will just do the most harmful thing possible. Sometimes I’m pleasantly surprised; otherwise, I’m prepared for the inevitable.

I don’t think they’re going to stop until they break something important enough that normal people start calling for blood.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Reporters need to just fucking report. What's with "all but dared them"? He told them to file it. Id say he dared them to do it.

Or, OR, don't put that in the story at all and just report what happened.

[–] Dangdoggo@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Is your issue that the reporter used language? I'd say the use of 'all but dared' is pretty appropriate here, he didn't precisely dare them but he may as well have. Not sure how that damages the integrity of the report.

load more comments (3 replies)