this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
128 points (81.4% liked)

politics

23730 readers
2333 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 126 points 2 months ago (2 children)

We still have three years to go before the next election, assuming one actually happens.

At this stage in the game, the only thing that these types of polls are going to reveal is who has the most name recognition.

In other words, everyone calm down.

[–] CarnivorousCouch@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Thank you! Any time this kind of polling shows up on Lemmy, users seem to think this is the Plan of the Democratic Leadership Cabal, rather than an incredibly premature name recognition test.

People want to vote for people they have favorable impressions of who they also think others will vote for. Without other frontrunners, who emerge over time, it's not surprising that polled Democrats would recognize and still support the candidate that 75 million people voted for five months ago.

If you want other candidates (I do), identify them and figure out how to help them build their profile now.

[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It's crazy how fast incredibly premature polling turns into unstoppable freight train that cannot be interrupted by anything but a certified act of God signed and dated with appropriate postage to oh shit oh God what's happening someone should have planned something.

[–] Omegamanthethird@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

Just like the polls that show McDonald's, Taco Bell, or Chic fil a as America's favorite restaurant in X state. It doesn't take too many idiots to outweigh everyone else.

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 117 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Are you fucking kidding me.

AOC and Bernie over here amassing entire legions of working class people and they're over here bashing themselves in the nuts. doing a straw poll with corporate doners pretending like it means fucking ANYTHING.

GODAMNIT THESE FUCKING DEMOCRATS ARE FUCKING MORONS.

[–] OminousOrange@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Perhaps time for a third party...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 113 points 2 months ago (2 children)

fucking morons.

people demanding progressives, but no, lets pretend conservative democrats have a fucking chance.

how tone-deaf can you fucking be.

[–] oxysis@lemm.ee 49 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Considering the Democratic Party has done this 3 times in a row and that they refuse to primary wildly unpopular members of their own party.

They are extremely tone deaf and out of touch with what the voters want. It’s why I want the progressives in the party to split off. The progressives are screwed if they stay, so why not leave and have an actual fucking chance?

Bernie Sanders got screwed over by the super delegates who all went for unpopular Hillary Clinton. Imagine how wildly different things would be if he was the Democratic nominee in 2016?

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 17 points 2 months ago

agreed. we have assholes like obama and bill clinton also to blame for sinking bernie in 2016.

they are 100% part of why trump is president right now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] waddle_dee@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I still feel like Harris had to gave been handicapped on progressive policies from the DNC. There's simply no way, with her record and history, that she wouldn't have campaigned on a completely separate platform than Biden unless he, and the DNC forbid it. Now, that brings about a new set of issues; in which she was unable to stand up to the establishment and say, fuck you guys. She used to be pretty progressive in the senate and it all went away with the VP.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Redditsux@lemmy.world 81 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Good god please no. Not again.

[–] something_random_tho@lemmy.world 62 points 2 months ago

Dems right now.

Goofy meme I’ll fucking do it again

[–] zenpocalypse@lemm.ee 57 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I like Harris just fine and she would have been a far better president than Donnie, but this is how JD Vance becomes President.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 51 points 2 months ago (3 children)

No they fucking haven't.

I don't know who they're polling to come up with that trash. Dems didn't turn out for her in 2024 because she had no answers on the economy, and refused to admit Israel was genociding Palestinians, so they sure as shit aren't going to turn up for her in 2028--if there's even an election in 2028--when she still won't have any answers about the economy--which will likely be in full depression territory by then--and all she'll be able to do with Israel is say, "well, it's too late, all the Palestinians have been genocided, oh well).

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 50 points 2 months ago

Jfc. They'll never learn. We really are all doomed.

Just kidding. We were doomed already.

[–] Wilco@lemm.ee 42 points 2 months ago (10 children)

No we fucking didn't. She can't win a primary against sanders.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 41 points 2 months ago

So, they prove once again that they don't learn.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 39 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Honestly I don't think she should run in 28. Nothing against Kamala, but we really don't need a moderate centrist insider to bring us back from the damage Trump is doing. The nation would be far better off having a real debate with Pete, Tim, and Alexandria up on stage. Kamala would have too much power over the process, and would use every bit of it. Which of course means that's exactly what's going to happen, probably handing us a narrow loss to fucking Don Jr. or some other moron puppet.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] exploitedamerican@lemm.ee 29 points 2 months ago

Mmore proof the neo liberal democratic party is a controlled opposition party who bows to the will of the same Wall Street military and prison industry profiteers that guide the policies of the right. Trump is going to be handed another 4 years after they repeal the 22nd amendment. this country is a fascist hellscape

[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why? Jfc just learn for once.

[–] themadcodger@kbin.earth 15 points 2 months ago
[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Here's an idea, maybe field a compelling candidate who can beat Trump?

Crazy I know. I just don't know where it comes from sometimes.

[–] Cyclist@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If Trump is allowed to run again so is Obama. Not sure how everyone feels about that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mr_Canard@jlai.lu 25 points 2 months ago

Never get tired of losing

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago

What the fuckkkkk

[–] TheDeadlySquid@lemm.ee 24 points 2 months ago

Please don’t.

[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago

I swear to god if they pull this nonsense again…

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 2 months ago

Can't wait until she loses again to the same dipshit moron she lost to and we're blamed again for her horrid policy campaign, again.

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is why repubs don't have to cheat to win. Democrats will it into existence.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wolfpack86@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] missingno@fedia.io 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Things the DNC has learned:

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Was this a poll of the DNC or registered Democrats? Asking because ad blocker.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Democrats love fucking losing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 21 points 2 months ago

I'm GLAD the Democrats are Pushing the Woman who LOST against a Billionaire Nazi who Campaigned on RUINING America and American Lives!

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 21 points 2 months ago

Sure, let's do the same stupid shit again and expect different results.

[–] halferect@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

no just no no no please god no

[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It's funny how libs think republicans are the only stupid "party".

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

You got that backward. Republicans have stupid constituents, and the democrats have a stupid party. Republicans have been playing the long game and reaping the rewards of decades worth of planning and posturing. Democrats can't agree on a vision. The democrats strength is also their biggest problem. They're a big tent party that's inclusive to all and all ideas. In practice, that means they lack a single vision to fight for and never long-term plan. If they quit focusing on the fringe and instead focused on the class war, they could have that singular, uniting vision.

[–] big_slap@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

we are so fucked.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

Surely they must mean "Favorite candidate to run away from"....

(I'm kidding, though. I liked Harris as a candidate, but not having a real primary did the Democrats no favors. I blame Biden for not dealing realistically with his aging more than Harris.)

Goddammitsomuch

[–] _lilith@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Fuck off loser

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 11 points 2 months ago

This is First Past The Post in action. 2/3 of respondents selected someone other than her, yet she "wins" this poll.

Drop the bottom 1/3rd of the candidates, and revote. Repeat a couple times. This soon after the election, Harris's support is as high as it's going to get. Reduce the number of spoilers, and her numbers have nowhere to go but down.

load more comments
view more: next ›