this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2025
566 points (97.6% liked)

YUROP

2400 readers
2 users here now

A laid back community for good news, pictures and general discussions among people living in Europe.

Topics that should not be discussed here:

Other casual communities:

Language communities

Cities

Countries

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cRazi_man@lemm.ee 62 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've seen a lot of individuals like this in my life.... "I don't want to play, so the game is over". No dude, you're welcome to not participate, but you're not the life of this group.

[–] boreengreen@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's also anoying when the oposite happens. You can't join? Then we will cancel. Just fkin do it. You don't need me every time.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

Isn't it beatiful how none of us do or could ever matter? But why does orange man get to have such influence. No one should matter in this world, that's the point!

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] atro_city@fedia.io 58 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We (the west) helped them become who they are. We relocated all our production there because they were cheap and didn't mind throwing a bunch of poor people into the grinder. Arguably, the fastest and most efficient way for them to get out from under our thumb was authoritarian rule. Democratic rule would've been torpedoed by the US or one of its European vassals in favour of an authoritarian one we installed.

The world could've looked very different had the US not meddled in a lot of countries. Here's an entire list that probably has about 70 countries on it.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

had the US not meddled in a lot of countries

Hold on a sec, you can't get off the hook that easy, Europe

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 15 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Democratic rule would've been torpedoed by the US or one of its European vassals in favour of an authoritarian one we installed.

Literally the sentence above it

[–] protist@mander.xyz 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That sentence still makes it sound like you think the US has been unilaterally directing western colonialism, but European nations have independently taken the initiative on that quite a bit

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 4 points 1 month ago

It's ridiculing the lack of agency European countries chose to have when being pulled into various wars and missions with the US. The comment additionally starts off with "We (the west)". If Europe doesn't belong to "the west", then where do they belong to?

[–] StJohnMcCrae@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

That sentence takes away agency from those European "vassals". The British and French empires still exist to this day. They conduct their own foreign policy and are in charge of their own internal security and territorial integrity.

The person you're responding to is absolutely right.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 5 points 1 month ago

Funny how you are able to use hyperbole without recognising it yourself.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Well, no - they definitely don't still exist. Their marks are still left on the places they once subjugated, sure, but they definitely do not exist anymore.

[–] StJohnMcCrae@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Tell that to northern Ireland, Scotland, Gibraltar, French Guiana or Polynesia.

Both countries still have overseas territories all over the world. It doesn't matter how hard you, they or anyone else tries to legitimize those colonies, that's still what they are.

Why were the French using the Polynesian islands as nuclear testing grounds up through 1996? Would the French government be so lax with testing in their own country? No - that's why they did it in a colony with 200,000 brown people instead.

[–] oce@jlai.lu -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sadly a better partner than the USA currently.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 1 month ago (3 children)

No. Just because the US has become worse than before and China didn't, even if the US closed in on how bad China is, that doesn't make China better than the US. More reliable, yes, but not better.

[–] boreengreen@lemm.ee 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Reliability is a big part of a good trading partner. Also helps if you can be reasoned with.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Cheap (slave) labor is also good for trade I guess. And an authoritarian regime is nice for stability.

[–] Palerider@feddit.uk 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Are you talking about USA or China?

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

Doesn't matter.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

To be fair, dictatorships are brittle, they are 100% stable up until suddenly they collapse.

Just look at assad.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

China seems to be lawful neutral. Much easier to deal with than USA's current chaotic evil.

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 14 points 1 month ago
[–] madcaesar@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Compared to USA, yes. Their own logic and code they follow.

[–] peregrin5@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Comment105@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Doesn't help that the stupid simple DnD system can't possibly give a decent explanation of the differences between the USA and China.

But yes, the USA is currently more threatening towards Europe and Canada than China is. The USA is also significantly more chaotic/unpredictable/unreasonable/insane.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

On which points do you think the current USA government is better than China's one?

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] oce@jlai.lu 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It seems so since you disagreed with my initial comment.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What I say is that we shouldn't trade extensively neither with China nor the US. Fuck China, fuck the US.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today -1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

How do I put this: Being under China would suck, but it would still be drasticaly better as they don't exterminate people out of sheer spite.

[–] Irelephant@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

The Uyghurs would disagree.

Unless I'm misreading your comment.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago

Relevant username

[–] oce@jlai.lu -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's a different point. The subject was which is a better partner currently.

[–] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

And the answer is they're both bad. Sometimes, even if you ask "A or B?" the answer is neither.

[–] forrgott@lemm.ee -3 points 1 month ago

Wow. That's like, one of the stupidest things I've read in a while.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In the 80s, 90s and early 00s the left was against globalism, so it's extremely weird to see things being reversed...

[–] phneutral@feddit.org 7 points 1 month ago

„Hoch die Internationale Solidarität!“ (Cheers to international solidarity)

[–] vegantomato@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Fyi, China is not in that crowd. China is at least as bad as the US. It just knows it can't afford to pull the same stunts. They are still an imperialistic shithole.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Honestly in what way would China be considered better?

They check all the boxes:

  • Malicious Trade and Finance shenanigans
  • Dictatorship
  • Militant Expansionists
  • Constant Psyops
  • Supporting horrible militant factions across the globe
  • Run by racial supremacists
  • Cracks down on non-official religions
  • Massive polluters (used to have the excuse of low emissions per capita until they started reversing policies meant to limit capita)

Every bad thing you can say about the USA goes for China and then some.

[–] shaserlark@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago

Yeah I guess we’re gonna get bombarded more with Chinese propaganda soon as they’ll try to replace the US as our new daddy

[–] EstonianGuy@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago

One of those things, does not belong with the others lol.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The "Christians" who take the Bible literally actually do believe that globalism is evil. But that's what happens when your religious texts were written first by nomads, then by a civilization that regularly got conquered, and finally a cult that was persecuted by the Romans.

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No, the "Christians" who oppose trade clearly have never even read the Bible, or even just the New Testament. Jesus spent a lot of time telling people to love the stranger, the traveler, and the alien. To treat a foreigner in your land as kindly as you would your brother. Modern Republicans have completely abandoned the teaching of the actual historical Jesus.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 1 points 4 weeks ago

That's now considered socialist and/or weak by these people. Not my words, they've says this to their own pastors. They're not Christians in anything but name and self-delusionment.

[–] nomorecids454@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Globalism IS evil. The rightards just care about it as much as the nazis cared about socialism.

[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 3 points 1 month ago

Explain please? I'm uncertain about the heart of where you're coming from

[–] yigruzeltil@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Explain please? I’m uncertain about the heart of where you’re coming from

Globalism is such a weasel word. Esperanto-speaking cosmopolitans and tax-dodging capitalists are usually not the same. Then again, the far-right demonized even Esperanto back in the past century and might do it again if people took it seriously.

[–] nomorecids454@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 month ago

Yea I think of globalism as a synonym for globalization, global markets, sweatshops, this kind of things.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

Yay! Canada's included in the joke!

load more comments
view more: next ›