this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
255 points (95.7% liked)

Science Memes

14644 readers
1823 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 34 points 1 month ago (2 children)

What units should we use for the formula?

I'm going with weeks for age, teaspoons for size, acres for area, and leagues for depth.

[–] apotheotic@beehaw.org 12 points 1 month ago

Some people will do anything except use SI units

[–] SmoothOperator@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

The units don't really matter as long as you're okay with your number of kids coming out with units of square root time over length(?)

[–] thawed_caveman@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The first part of the equation seems to make sense, the number of eggs does depend on the number of children, age of the children, and size of the eggs. Makes sense that each of the kids gets two eggs. Not sure why it's the square root of y, but okay.

The (a+d) part i just don't understand at all. Why are the physical properties of the garden relevant?

And yeah, as the other commenter pointed out, i wonder what units they're even using for some of this data

[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Area would help account for a really large yard, where you may want more eggs, or for a small one, where this calculation simply has too many eggs. So, egg density per square foot (or whatever unit they wanted).

Undergrowth size to me seems like its accounting for how many eggs simply aren't found. If the grass is 6" long, you'll want more eggs because they'll not all be found.

This seems to fit especially because they're added together, which means even a yard that was just dirt, no undergrowth, you'd get eggs from area alone. There's a floor on it. If it were a separate multiple then no grass would mean no eggs.

[–] xthexder@l.sw0.com 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Most of those seem like nonlinear relationships, so it still doesn't make any sense still. The undergrowth would only start becoming an issue when the height gets taller than the egg diameter.

[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I agree, but that seems like about the level of detail a formula with no units would have.

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Three 64 year old kids hunting a single 0.5m³ egg over a 12-by-8 metre garden

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Where did you get a dinosaur, or dragon egg?

[–] tetris11@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago

Well I imagine that they were playing Jumanji, lost a go, and have now been trapped in the game for decades on a single finite square bound infinitely in all directions, searching for the one Parasaurolophus egg to free one of them from the game.

[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

If we hold the hunt in a single tall blade of grass we'll need to fit a lot of eggs in there.

[–] TimewornTraveler@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

4 four year olds doing an egg hunt of egg-sized eggs in a garden of area 10m sq with no undergrowth means we need 160 eggs

[–] Pantsofmagic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I thought we were using potatoes so we didn't have to waste eggs!

[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Make the eggs bigger