this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
809 points (99.1% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

39674 readers
46 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pewpew@feddit.it 2 points 6 days ago

Pinterest is not even a social

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 263 points 1 week ago (6 children)

That's objectively poor survey design. For questions like that there should always be an 'Other' option. There should also be a 'None' or 'N/A' option.

[–] WolfmanEightySix@piefed.social 132 points 1 week ago (10 children)

A radio presenter this morning was talking like we all have Instagram, I found that incredibly annoying.

[–] Tyoda@lemm.ee 60 points 1 week ago (8 children)

There are 2 billion MAUs on there. We are the weird ones.

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 59 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] punksnotdead@slrpnk.net 49 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not to mention one person having multiple accounts for different purposes and business accounts. Instagram is big, no doubt, but not 2 billion users big

[–] Impleader@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

And how many are bots?

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago

Yeah, just for my roommate ages back there's her, her dog, the creepy person stealing the pictures of her dog and making an account based on that

[–] StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I first questioned why two billion cats have Instagram accounts, then realized there can't be 2 billion Egyptian Maus in all the world, much less on Instagram.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tyoda@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago

2 billion is only a quarter of 8 billion. They are the weird ones.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 50 points 1 week ago

Agreed, the only way this would be acceptable if this was in an application for a Social Media manager position?

[–] TherapyGary@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 week ago

I complained in the "other" box that they did include for a different question lol

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago

And yet, I think most people are checking all those boxes, unfortunately. Pray for their mental health! 😵

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] icedterminal@lemmy.world 77 points 1 week ago (1 children)

By not having "None of the above" or an "Other" allowing you to fill in the blank, instantly discards this data as viable. which makes this question pointless to even answer, let alone ask.

[–] EstonianGuy@lemm.ee 36 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think they shot themselves in the foot, one thing thats worse than no data is wrong data. And they are forcing people to produce wrong data.

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Choose every option.

[–] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 77 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Why are people who make questionnaires so bad at making questionnaires? It's baffling. This post is particularly glaring but I always find stupid errors or assumptions like this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Pinterest. They're like half of google results.

[–] Phen@lemmy.eco.br 53 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And I never understood how to use it. If I click on a Google result from Pinterest I'm always taken to something completely different.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh good. I'm not the only one.

[–] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 19 points 1 week ago

far from it.

its a dysfunctional link aggregator. their entire business model is consolidation of other people's web content. make a FUCKING ACCOUNT IF YOU WANT TO SEE THE PHOTOS BRAIDED LEATHER WRISTBANDS

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Or maybe google shouldn't include spam in its results.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Wow. I can honestly say I spend less than an hour a week on all of those. I wasn't expecting that.

[–] III@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can honestly say I have spent less than an hour in my life on all of those added together. Probably less than 10 minutes. Does that mean I am winning?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] zqwzzle@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Think of it as giving them bad data.

[–] pipes@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I'm exclusively on Pinterest 100hours/week. (I forgot to close the tab with the image search for cool origami)

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

No one will like hearing this answer but they may already understand the issue of it being bad data and have a good reason not to care.

Here’s the thing. When “none” or “skip” is there, people gravitate toward it. You end up getting 75% of people saying “none” for every question, and then your entire survey is meaningless. I hate surveys too. Everyone hates them. All the more reason to just mash “skip” or “none.” Because fuck you and fuck your survey.

Meanwhile, what % of people don’t touch any of these social networks? Maybe we can’t say for sure, but it’s way less than 75%.

So you’re choosing between two possible sources of bad data, and choosing the one you know to be of lower magnitude.

[–] superkret@feddit.org 13 points 1 week ago

Then provide an "other" option with a text box instead.
Make entering some text mandatory if you click it.
No one gravitates toward that.
Besides, a "none" option can just be discarded when you analyze the data.
If all your boxes are social media sites, you have no idea which ones are poisoned by bad data, and by how much.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 35 points 1 week ago (5 children)

All they need to do is put YouTube on there for a more meaningful survey.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

I hate that "social media" is such a broad umbrella term. It totally lacks useful context. "Social networking site" is great, straightforward and descriptive. But "social media" encompasses every way we communicate with each other except for "traditional media" which got grandfathered through. BBS predates the internet!

All that to say: YouTube is, for many, a public-access TV station and I'm too young to be this mad about it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

What the what? There is no "none of these" choice? In that case I'd check them all. And in the next screen when they ask how many hours for each, put 100 hours for each of them.

I have never had an account on any of those, did have a very long run on Reddit and a couple of interest-specific communities.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Didn't even have Reddit lmao

[–] mriswith@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They sabotaged themselves years ago by squashing popular votes with an algorithm, so a large amount of people don't realize the size of the site.

You can go look at recent popular tweets and see 200k reactions, meanwhile the top posts on reddit show 10-30k votes, despite having 2-50 times as many behind the scenes.

[–] Lanske@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

None of the above?

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 week ago

“Please poison my data”

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (3 children)

how the hell someone can use pinterest for more than one hour a week? Just accidentally browse it when trying to search an image on the web and curse the ux team to have hidden the download button in a way that you click the image and brings you in a completely unrelated site with 10000 images except the one you wanted

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Hey, look, all the sites I specifically avoid, plus Pinterest which just happens to get avoided.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I would get discord, youtube, lemmy, and reddit

I try to avoid new platforms tho bc I don't trust myself not to get addicted and social media already takes up too much of my time

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’d just abandon it if I couldn’t answer a question or it was too involved (like a free text box answer).

load more comments (1 replies)

closes questionnaire

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Lol tell them you use Pinterest.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] viking 12 points 1 week ago

Why bother taking the survey then, or is it somehow mandatory?

[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›