this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
51 points (100.0% liked)

News

29616 readers
2819 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When asked about the use of polygraph exams, DHS Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement, "The Department of Homeland Security is a national security agency. We can, should, and will polygraph personnel."

Friendly ~~WARNING~~ reminder of McLaughlin's reassuring statement when DHS began dismantling the Office of Civil Rights and Liberties (OCRL) back in March.

McLaughlin said Homeland Security is “committed to civil rights protections” but said these offices were a roadblock to immigration enforcement. “These offices have obstructed immigration enforcement by adding bureaucratic hurdles and undermining DHS’s mission. Rather than supporting law enforcement efforts, they often function as internal adversaries that slow down operations,” she said.

Here are some other ~~WARNINGS~~ reminders from that March article, including one from an employee of OCRL, who has probably been hooked up to a lie detector since trying to ~~WARN~~ explain to us what that office actually does.

"With Trump’s mass firing of the entire DHS Civil Rights and Civil Liberties workforce, he is ensuring in advance that there will be no transparency or oversight of his extreme agenda,” said Rep. Bennie G. Thompson of Mississippi, the top Democrat on the House Committee on Homeland Security.

A staffer who works in the Civil Rights and Civil Liberties office and asked not to be identified for fear of retribution stressed that the office’s mission stretches far beyond immigration and border security, noting that they look into allegations concerning all parts of Homeland Security, including the Transportation Safety Administration and the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

These employees that are being hooked up to lie detectors for ~~WARNING~~ leaking information to the American public, are also the ones responsible for letting us know that the president gave ICE permission to enter homes without a warrant back in March if they believe a suspect may be in the home. Sound like some God damn patriots to me.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

These things have been debunked over and over again. But science is woke anyway.

[–] Mirodir@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They have been debunked as lie detectors...
...But they can work at scaring the person testifying into giving away more information.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 8 points 2 weeks ago

Another effect is that after the "test", the subject is much more likely to unload and divulge useful (and possibly incriminating) information.

[–] AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee 8 points 2 weeks ago

Bring Phrenology back to our country!

"You have the sloping brow of a common criminal."

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago

They can't be used in court for a reason. They're unreliable.

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Following the usual rule of questions in the headline, no polygraphs don't work. They might make people worried enough to make a mistake.

[–] AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Rarely there are also people who don't even have a detectable physiological reaction even if they are guilty.

Best case scenario, you risk framing a bunch of people who didn't do shit, except get nervous bc an authoritarian regime hooked them up to a lie detector test, in order to find the person who tried to place their country above themselves. There's also a chance that person doesn't even get caught with the lie detector test bc it's such a bullshit technology.

Why not just have a psychic come in and start reading tea leaves? Or better yet just put some names on a dart board and blind fold the dart thrower to figure out the leaks? Fucking dumb sacks of shit.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

Best case scenario, you risk framing a bunch of people who didn’t do shit

They want names. They don't care if they're actually guilty.

[–] AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago

Also, if you meet one asshole in the morning, you met an asshole. If all day, all you meet are assholes, then you're the asshole.

It's one thing if you got one leak in one department, if you got multiple leaks in multiple departments, maybe the issue isn't the fucking leakers!

[–] Widdershins@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

If they're looking for leaks they should check the pants of the orange man in charge.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They work as intimidation tools.

[–] AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah and like any intimidation tools, sometimes you get your desired goal, a lot of times you get false confessions/false positives, and sometimes if the guilty person really knows what they're doing, they get off scot-free.

Then the people you're using the intimidation tool against become even more resentful, distrustful, and skeptical of your leadership capabilities, even if they're scared or intimidated by you.

Not that I would expect anything different from these people, but I guess just goes to show money can't really buy strategic or critical thinking skills.