this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
615 points (97.8% liked)

politics

23643 readers
2648 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump lashed out at bipartisan critics after reports revealed he plans to accept a $400 million Boeing 747-8 jet from Qatar for use as Air Force One.

In a Truth Social post, Trump dismissed concerns as “world class losers” complaining about a transparent gift. Qatar stated the plane is under legal review between its Ministry of Defense and the Pentagon.

Critics, including Sen. Bernie Sanders, Sen. Chris Murphy, and Rep. Jamie Raskin, accused Trump of corruption and violating the Constitution.

Even allies like Laura Loomer led the MAGA pushback to the jet deal.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FireAtWill@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

But think of the money to be made, after his term is up, being able to tune in on this country's secret communications. I'm sure Trump's thinking, why not?

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 208 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Besides the obvious corruption, it's a national security issue. I'm not an aircraft designer, but I'm pretty sure there's quite a bit of electronics aboard that craft. Pretty easy to slip in a few listening devices.

[–] caffinatedone@lemmy.world 79 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

To be fair, the trump crew don't observe any real security anyway, so all of the more competent competent competitors likely already know our secrets.

I mean, assuming that trump doesn't just tweet them out, he'd absolutely sell our secrets for some graft.

[–] Bouzou@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago

Or members of his cabinet just accidentally add foreign agents to classified chats...

[–] Dultas@lemmy.world 45 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Not to mention the refit to include all the secure communication equipment Air Force One has. Also ECM, active countermeasures, NBC equipment, refuelling, etc.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 21 points 2 weeks ago

And then remove part of it a year later when it transfers to him

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Realistically, it would probably cost more to retrofit a plane than to just build it from scratch.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 32 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm sure Qatar sees him saying "yeah, then it'll be mine" and are thinking 'nooo, we wanted all the presidents to use it...'

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 46 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Then you're not up to speed....

January 2029 it transfers to the "trump presidential library" so he can keep using it.

It's not even to "the office" it's a personal gift to trump.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

That was my first though, that airplane is gonna have a direct line to the government of Qatar

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 16 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

The more you think about it, the stupider the idea is.

Besides the obvious security problems, Air Force 1 is to a regular plane what a Formula One racer is to a regular car. Someone else pointed out things like counter-surveillance measures, refueling, etc etc.

It would be twice as expensive to retrofit it.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] mkhopper@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago

But, would that be so bad?

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 147 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (7 children)

People just aren't considering the arguments in favor of accepting it, such as how cool it would be to receive what might be the biggest bribe in the history of bribery.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 37 points 2 weeks ago

It likely also has the best always-on one-way communication link to Qatar that money can buy.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 37 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

There's sadly been much bigger bribes.

Even within his family.

It's certainly the biggest one a president has openly accepted. By, like, 400 million dollars.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 84 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So trump now owes Qatar a 400 billion dollar favor, it's that simple

(For those not getting it, it's a jab at doge mixing up million and billion)

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 43 points 2 weeks ago

He absolutely DOES owe them 400 billion now.

To quote Kurt Hansen from Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty. "To make billions, you first need to grease the palms of others with millions".

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 42 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Trump is a insider threat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 37 points 2 weeks ago

Alternative headline: "Spoiled child throws tantrum when told No."

[–] fwdbias@lemm.ee 33 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

So....is anyone not thinking that the plane is absolutely chock full of spying devices? I mean sure Trump is too stupid to think of it as anything other than a tribute to his greatness but is there a single sane person there?

[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

No need for spying devices, he's for sale they can just buy the info they need.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aeroplayne@lemm.ee 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh, this jet is going to have more bugs than a rainforest. It will be hilarious and compromising.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 10 points 2 weeks ago

i dont think you need to bug trumps planes, he has a big mouth and will say anything for money.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lightor@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 31 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Traitors to the Constitution & rule of law applied universally should get only gifts of a short rope and a long drop

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 27 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

He's losing a lot of support....

One of the joys of living in a red state, is plenty of uninformed people voted for him. A shit ton of them are saying they're not voting again.

But with an actual impartial DNC chair, once we get a candidate (especially if it's a charismatic one who's economically progressive) it's gonna be easy to get them to vote D like with Obama.

But with the dnc's track record, them not voting is the best we can have right now.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 33 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Don’t be fooled. They will fall in line again. They will vote for Trump again if they have to. They’ll have to stop [insert boogeyman here].

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That constitution is becoming a real barrier for Trump.

[–] TheCriticalMember@aussie.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago

Is it though?

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 24 points 2 weeks ago

We all know that he can't stand to the slightest bit of criticism. He's a narcissist, that's part of what narcissists are.

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

Hear me out… what if this is them doing the us a “favor”

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 22 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

Wait.... The plane is transparent? Wow! We should accept that sucker like now and figure out how they did it! LOL.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] FireAtWill@lemmy.world 19 points 2 weeks ago

One man's beautiful gift is almost everyone else's blatant corruption.

[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

Ah. What a guy. Calling his constituents, who he pledged to protect, "losers"

He's the best. Everyone's saying it. Some say he's the best ever.. And, listen, some of the world's best people have said so. He's awesome.

/S

Was that a decent imitation of that orange moron?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

First of all, he is not "losing his mind". You cannot lose what you already lost decades ago.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Naevermix@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

Corrupt piece of shit.

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 13 points 2 weeks ago

Toddler throws a tantrum.

[–] Emil_Zatopek1982@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago

He ain't got no mind to lose.

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Let him have the plane. Its probably sabotaged anyway.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 25 points 2 weeks ago

Even better, it's a Boeing.

[–] miraclerandy@lemmy.world 14 points 2 weeks ago

I’d guess it would be less dramatic than that. Probably mics and bugs throughout it so they can get some good data on him.

[–] jimjam5@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Maybe we will get lucky and he’ll invite musk and other billionaire backers into the plane for its first official flight, at which point Boeing plane does what it does best coupled with a crippled FAA… one can dream.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Hope he paid the 10% tarrif on that $400 mil plane being shipped here from another country lol

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›