this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
141 points (94.9% liked)

Games

39021 readers
907 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 58 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (7 children)

tl;dr Dark Ages doesn’t have anything left that made Doom 2016 fun for me

I had a real sense that The Dark Ages wasn’t going to be my game. Am I the only one tired of games just piling on completely new feature sets and complicated feature sets to remember, level over level?

I enjoyed Doom 2016 because for a large portion of the game, the mechanics were simple enough that you could get into flow state even at the higher difficulties. I couldn’t make it halfway through Eternal before I was annoyed at having to switch strategy every 5 seconds.

Dark Ages looks more like an Action RPG than Doom. Not to mention the constant tutorial interruptions. Can we go back to ammo, health and maybe grenades for once in a AAA game? It always feels like AAA means complicated game mechanics, rather than letting a simple gameplay loop speak for itself in a AAA environment with all the other benefits that come with it.

Last thing to add, the intro level of Dark Ages looked incredibly bland, like it was a midpoint level of one of the other games. The game just sort of assumes that the other games have been played and that you enjoyed them and starts from there, rather than standing on its own.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

DOOM 2016 captured the essence of the originals with some added systems, but they never felt too invasive. Eternal threw that out the window, seems like this is the same. Just more AAA slop for insane prices.

Fuckin shame, I was hoping for more of the 2016 vibe.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

it's not for everyone 🤷‍♀️

Doom Eternal is one of my favorite games precisely because you switch weapons so often and are a slaughter machine. I beat the dlcs and had a blast. I enjoyed the difficulty honestly, it forced me to get better and actually feel like I 'deserved' to have the power of the doomslayer. The Marauder has to be my favorite enemy in all of gaming. He was SO hard the first time but once you learn how to counter him you can FUCK HIM UPP. It's so satisfying to completely 180 him and turn him to a pile of gibs. The 2 at once fight in the first DLC was my favorite encounter of the whole game.

Tutorial hints were super annoying though, however you can just turn them off in settings.

2016 was boring for me tbh. Super excited for dark ages.

[–] Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com 5 points 3 weeks ago

Eternal is so intense, 2016 feels slow and boring and simple in comparison. I prefer depth over simplicity. IDK about Dark Ages though, it looks slower with less mobility/verticality

[–] WhiteBurrito@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

I agree, I like both, but Eternal does force you to use most of your weapons and other systems continuously, like having to use demons as piñatas. The DLC is brutal, I remember having to stop for a breather after a particular spot because it was too hectic, I was bouncing around the level trying to kill everything but also basically always being at the brink of death, pure adrenaline . 2016 is not bad either, is just a good game overall, it captures the same feeling as the original games, it's slower, but it's still damn enjoyable, and that's also ok.

I just started The Dark ages yesterday and it DOES feel more bland vs eternal IMO (at least the first level), and the shield homing attack seems dumb to me IMO, but it's still simple fun being an unstoppable demon slayer

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

I got through eternal, and for the most part had fun. (fuck marauders) But the damn skill ceiling in the DLC killed my interest in completing those. 2016 was definitely my favorite of the two and I really liked the back too roots mechanics. The devs have talked about how they want to do something different in each game and how Dark Ages is intended to be more grounded than eternal and hopefully less complicated. Also has tons of difficulty sliders for every little aspect of the game so it should be much more tailorable than previous games.

[–] the_q@lemm.ee 4 points 3 weeks ago

OK boomer-shooter.

This was a joke.

[–] AntelopeRoom@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago

I don't know much about the Dark Ages because I haven't played it yet. I am somewhat skeptical of the shift in tone and the introduction of melee components like shield. Doom is about blasting demons on Mars. The medival stuff is a bit weird. I actually did like Eternal though, and felt it brought back the faster gameplay that 2016 lacked.

[–] nul9o9@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 3 weeks ago

For me, Doom Eternal was the most fun. But I missed 2016s visual style.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah I guess they wanted to take each new Doom game in a new direction. Which is a shame, because they don't really feel like Doom, they feel like other games with a Doom theme. Even Doom 3, which was more horror than action, still felt like Doom. Because of that, I liked it, even if a lot of people didn't.

[–] ActuallyGoingCrazy@sh.itjust.works 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

At least they gave up pretending to put the whole game on disc since they're unplayable without a 60gb+ day one patch anyways...

[–] technomad@slrpnk.net 25 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Why even bother? It seems wasteful, to say the least.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

So much for physical media.

[–] nuko147@lemm.ee 15 points 3 weeks ago

What kind of compression do they use? /s

[–] Dremor@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

Truly the dark ages...

[–] SolarPunker@slrpnk.net 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

Imagine the same for a blu-ray film...

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 weeks ago

Don't give them ideas.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

The worst part is that it's technically possible to do that using the bd-live 2.0 specification

[–] el_bhm@lemm.ee 0 points 3 weeks ago

SHUT YOUR WHORE MOUTH SATAN

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 weeks ago

Talk about optimization!

[–] nagaram@startrek.website 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Do they even make disks with enough space for a modern game? Secondly, would a spinning disk be fast enough for it?

I feel like the only way for truly physical media in the AAA space to be a thing again is if people are willing to pay an extra $60+ for an external SSD that holds the game.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 10 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Blu-rays can hold up to 128GB (BDXL, quadruple-layer).

Read speed could be an issue, but if you're smart about preloading and compress what's on disc, you have to read less data (you just have to decompress it in memory instead). If you want to get really fancy, there are compression algorithms that let you seek inside compressed data so that you don't have to load the whole archive.

[–] nagaram@startrek.website 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Well there's all the problems then

Asking a AAA studio to make their game sub 128 GB AND optimize it in anyway is a tall ask

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago

They don't even need to optimize, forced install is OK. If I'm going to have the complete game on the drive anyway, at least save me download times.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

AND complete it 1-2 months before release date to allow manufacturing and shipping.

They complete it 1-2 months AFTER release date now...

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

How to fricking ~~blur~~ erase the line between physical and digital. DISGUSTING!

[–] warm@kbin.earth 5 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Discs have just been a physical license key for a long time now. It's kind of wasteful to even ship discs and the plastic cases anymore, some kind of little card with a chip on would suffice.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 5 points 3 weeks ago

That's what they're doing with Switch games now and people are still getting their panties in a twist.

Personally I've long since switched to all digital downloads. Even if it eventually becomes inaccessible, either I don't plan on playing it more, or I'll pirate and emulate it.

[–] Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Optical discs are extremely cheap, I wouldn't be surprised if it's cheaper than a 128MB chip of storage.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I meant enviromentally. I couldnt care less about the monetary cost to the companies.

[–] Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com 3 points 3 weeks ago

maybe, fabricating chips and soldering to boards doesn't come without environmental costs either

obviously the companies won't care about that enough to find out lol

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

That would be way more reasonable than wasting Blu-ray's for less than a percent of its storage capacity being used by a fricking stub.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What most people get irked about is loss of ownership, which can be a separate topic with careful management. For instance, if you buy an ItchIO game, there’s no DRM and you can copy it anywhere - I imagine many would be fine with digital downloads if everywhere used that system, but on the corporate side they’d likely be grumbling about piracy.

[–] warm@kbin.earth 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yea, but I dont think anyone who is buying a console these days cares about ownership like that.

Physical media died a long time ago on PC. The DRM-free options exist as downloads.