this post was submitted on 17 May 2025
572 points (98.5% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

31671 readers
4951 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 51 points 5 days ago

This, but unironically.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Can't hear the dialog | Christopher Nolan

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

This comment is the thread killer.

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

All the comments here jumping to talk about how wrong this is, I gotta ask: haven't you seen a bad movie?

Art films or blockbusters (or rather, attempts at blockbusters), plenty of movies just suck. Many bad movies will have endless amounts of people trying to change the narrative with the words on the right column.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

There are also plenty of films where people just absolutely dont get it

My favorite example is annihilation

And here is an excellent video about it: https://youtu.be/URo66iLNEZw

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Me when 2001: A Space Odyssey

[–] sxan@midwest.social 20 points 5 days ago

Oh. Oh, have I got a story.

When Star Wars came out, I was 11. It was making a lot of noise, and my mom kept trying to convince me to go see it, but we'd driven by the theater and I was convinced - convinced - that it would be boring, and refused. Of course I did end up going, and spent the summer in the theater; this was before they kicked you out and made you buy tickets for each showing. I ended up seeing it 16 times in the theater, that summer.

Anyway, fast forward a couple dozen years and I'm watching an 2001, and I notice that it was originally released and advertised as being in "stereophonic sound." Checked with mom, and she confirmed that they had taken me to see 2001 in the theater at some point, and I realized that I must have recognized the "In Stereophonic Sound!" on the Star Wars billboard and made the association that that meant "boring."

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I fucking hate Kubrick. Every movie feels cold and soulless, and they move slower than a snail on lean.

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

They’re definitely slow burns that challenge you.

[–] Whateley@lemm.ee 4 points 5 days ago

Glad to know I'm not the only one who walks away from a Kubrick movie feeling like they just had a conversation with the most boring person on the planet.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

2001 was genuinely terrible, absolutely nothing was explained during the move. If I hadn't read the book beforehand, I'd have had no idea what was going on from roughly half way onwards.

[–] seliaste@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 5 days ago

My favorite movie, Hana-bi by Takeshi Kitano, always makes me feel so much whenever I see it.

When I showed it to my parents (my 6th rewatch), they were joking all the time about how boring it was, how lengthy the scenes were... Except towards the end they started getting into it. And it hit them so hard. They were not used to seeing movies taking their time to tell something deeply personal. My mom then said to me "I am thankful to not have stopped watching, because it will remain in me".

So I think this meme is sometimes unironically right.

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

But I love David Lynch

Recordings of public executions challenge me

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Dreamlike Atmosphere: When my girlfriend and I saw James Cameron's Avatar in IMAX on release and both fell asleep.

[–] quetzaldilla@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Movies are made to tell stories that the directors and the producers feel inspired to tell. And unless they are a Marvel or DC movie, they aren't always meant to appeal to every audience member, and it's childish to think that movies should always cater to your every whim-- especially when people are so goddamn quick to judge things others worked really hard on so goddamn harshly.

And before the "but mah money, tho!" shit-- that's fucking capitalism, and not unique to movies.

Not every movie is going to be to your taste, and that's cool. What's not cool is shitting on a movie just because you didn't like it or it didn't make sense to you.

Reviews are meant to help you choose which movies you want to bother watching. Using the terms in the green column is helpful in giving the reader a sense of what to expect from a movie while avoiding a negative personal impression.

The red column is very reflective of modern online critiques:

Harsh. Impulsive. Thoughtless. Black & white.

Often made without fully engaging with whatever is being critiqued:

"I haven't watched the movie, but based on the trailer I bet it's trash."

"I hate Darren Aronofsky movies because they don't explain what is happening and they're stupid."

"I heard this movie was great, but I watched it and it sucked. Therefore, everyone else is wrong."

[–] Isoprenoid@programming.dev 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

What’s not cool is shitting on a movie just because you didn’t like it or it didn’t make sense to you.

If you don't like or don't get a work of art, it is entirely reasonable to shit on it.

The emperor has no clothes.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, nobody is going to stop me from shitting all over Ayn Rand novels and film adaptations.

[–] quetzaldilla@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Not should anyone, honestly. They are a travesty.

[–] quetzaldilla@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

To clarify, my comment specifically is about superficial movie reviews, critiques, & recommendations.

Criticism within the context of a movie discussion, presuming everyone involved actually engaged with the movie, is part of healthy dialogue & idea exchange.

I've had my point of view changed plenty within such discussions, and brain dead people do not usually bother to participate in such forums so it's a win-win.

[–] Whateley@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago

That isn't an incorrect critique of Aronofsky. His shit really doesn't hold up after the critics stop climbing over each other to laud his obtuse cinematography and incoherent plots as genius.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

But can we still shit on Michael Bay?

[–] quetzaldilla@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

I think blatant cash grabs are fair game for harsh criticism.

[–] lasers4eyes@piefed.social 9 points 5 days ago

This made me lol, I know several people IRL who talk like this.

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The last two might make sense, the others don't. But regardless, what is boring to one might not be to others. Some watch movies for visual spectacle and beautiful shots, others for deep, well written stories and sentimentality, strong emotion well portrayed, for instance. Preference is not necessarily an objective measure of quality, is what I'm saying, and that's okay. That's why you find some critic that watches movies for the same reasons and then try not to miss the movies he also enjoyed...

[–] RedAggroBest@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Or maybe all art house films get described this way when, like any other art form, plenty of them just suck.

Sometimes a movie just sucks and won't accept that it sucks.

[–] Flamekebab@piefed.social 1 points 5 days ago

Synecdoche, New York