this post was submitted on 17 May 2025
42 points (93.8% liked)

Fuck AI

2872 readers
873 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/29799024

MIT Says It No Longer Stands Behind Student’s AI Research Paper

The paper said that after an AI tool was implemented at a large materials-science lab, researchers discovered significantly more materials—a result that suggested that, in certain settings, AI could substantially improve worker productivity. That paper, by Aidan Toner-Rodgers, was covered by The Wall Street Journal and other media outlets.

The paper was championed by MIT economists Daron Acemoglu, who won the 2024 economics Nobel, and David Autor.

In a press release, MIT said it “has no confidence in the provenance, reliability or validity of the data and has no confidence in the veracity of the research contained in the paper.”

The university said the author of the paper is no longer at MIT.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

If literally anyone bothered to check “2nd year Ph.D. student” would’ve ended it, shame it had to go so far in the process

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

"The paper was championed by MIT economists Daron Acemoglu, who won the 2024 economics Nobel, and David Autor. The two said they were approached in January by a computer scientist with experience in materials science who questioned how the technology worked, and how a lab that he wasn’t aware of had experienced gains in innovation."

It sounds like this hypothetical materials science lab maybe did not actually exist. Actual materials scientist reached out and went "Hey, I never heard of that lab, who are they and how did they use AI?" Oh... THAT lab? Yeah, it's in Canada, you don't know it...

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

While I appreciate some of the clarification in the actual linked article, I don't like that it makes claims that Google has done this but doesn't post a link about the specifics. When did Google make such claims about their AI and what were the claims?