this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
111 points (93.7% liked)

politics

23643 readers
2715 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Exhibit 8509776654 of why Democrats are pathetic

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 6 days ago

Right up there with being 'deeply concerned' about the things they're doing.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 86 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“That guy is a human trafficker, that guy is a gang member,” Rubio said.

“Secretary Rubio should take that testimony to the federal court of the United States because he hasn’t done it under oath,” Van Hollen snapped.

More Dems need to be doing what Hollen is doing. They need to hold these people's feet to the fire.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hollen got the secretary of state he voted for.

“I have to tell you directly and personally that I regret voting for you for secretary of state,” said Maryland Sen. Chris Van Hollen,

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I can't argue with that, but at least he acknowledges the error and is doing something, anything about it.

Edit to add:

Democrats unanimously confirmed former Florida Sen. Marco Rubio as Donald Trump’s secretary of state earlier this year...

Frankly, every Democrat in the Senate should be on the attack and profusely apologizing for their stupidity.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

but at least he acknowledges the error

Who fucking cares? Everyone knew Rubio is a complicit sack of shit. Dogs knew it.

Every fucking Dem senator voting for Rubio when he was going to be confirmed anyway makes them all look complicit with Trump administration. What a bunch of chickenshits supporting traitors who never needed their votes anyway.

Frankly, every Democrat in the Senate should be on the attack and profusely apologizing for their stupidity.

They shouldn't have voted for Rubio in the first place!

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The difference is that basically anyone nominated after Rubio would be worse. He's basically the best person put forward by this admin, as sorry as that is.

Sounds more like damage control than much else. That they have to do because, you know, America thought they didn't have to bother voting dem because it's whatever. Hence gestures around

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

If zero Dems voted for Rubio then Rubio would still be in the same position but the Dems wouldn't look like jackasses for giving him votes. It wasn't damage control, it was a self goal.

How is rolling over for the Republicans going to work for them in the next election?

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Maybe it wasn't that then. I don't say I support it but I'm guessing they were thinking (old school) that if they voted for someone who of course they don't like but is actually a somewhat serious candidate that the Republicans would respond by nominating more like that.

But again, that kind of thinking is still going on in the Dem party and obviously outdated. One would think they'd learn that there is no give and take with this batch of Republicans. At all.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

I have no idea how the old guard can't understand how much things have changed in the last few decades when that is their full time job.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You are correct, they shouldn't have but you can't change the past. They fucked up. I want them to do something now to try and do something about it to try and fix the problem.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How will they ever fix the problem when they keep making the same stupid mistakes?

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

By attacking the Republicans at every step and making every evil choice as public as possible. What else can they do? What do you want them to do?

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Not voting for shitty Republican nominees would be a fucking start. Whining about what the administration is doing while actively supporting it is the fucking opposite of attacking the Republicans.

Obstruct the horrible shit with procedural steps. Get on the news and call RFK Jr a "FUCKING LIAR" about not being an antivaxxer. Be direct instead of using coy phrasing that goes over the general public's head. Be crass! Be anything other than the milquetoast wet blankets that they continue to be.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 61 points 1 week ago (1 children)

“Your regret for voting for me confirms I’m doing a good job,” Rubio fired back.

We now run our foreign policy based entirely on what pisses off Liberals the most....

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

Consistent with our domestic policy, so that checks out.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

Democrats unanimously confirmed former Florida Sen. Marco Rubio as Donald Trump’s secretary of state earlier this year,

Of course they fucking did. Probably assumed it was the least worst option, but it wasn't like there was any reason to go along with any nomination because their votes weren't needed and it isn't like Republicans reciprocate.

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

“I have to tell you directly and personally that I regret voting for you for secretary of state,” said Maryland Sen. Chris Van Hollen,

You literally didn't have to do that. You knew exactly who he is and exactly what he was going to do. You could have voted against him.

But I guess your regret is some small comfort.