this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
161 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

11666 readers
1314 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/64597842

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] grue@lemmy.world 38 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

The sad thing is that if pro-transit folks did this sort of thing, it would absolutely be paraded around as an excuse to discredit the entire pro-transit position and kill the proposal by default, but when classists/NIMBYs/car-brains engage in blatant bad faith they're never collectively punished for it in the same way.

The side trying to make positive change is always held to a higher double standard than the side trying to maintain the status quo.

[–] 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

In a way positive change double standard might be a protection against corruption, because if the positive change isn't even able to withstand scrutiny how is the change planning to be kept up. I'm not arguing for it, I just assume that this is one of the reasons it is there (and status quo bias of course).

[–] Jake_Farm@sopuli.xyz 38 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 29 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

It is only fraud if the perpetrators are treated as fraudsters.

Otherwise, it's another Wednesday.

[–] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Is it illegal to lie? They are not trying to steal money. Yes they're misrepresenting themselves on purpose but is it illegal? I have no clue.

[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

Lying for personal gain is fraud still, though not criminal.

Customers can decide if they want to conduct business with the business after the fact. I know I wouldn't want to.

[–] naught101@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Presumably they see it as somehow affecting their bottom line? Guess it could just be outright bigotry though.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

Political mischief maybe? Making a false sense of community sentiment or opinion.

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 19 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Hello fellow humans, I like eating parts of plants and flesh from some animals but not other animals. Also, how silly are bus lanes.

[–] Uli@sopuli.xyz 9 points 19 hours ago

That sounds a lot like me! I enjoy adorning the walls of my living space with objects that are not so much functional as they are ornamental. It really helps to lower the internal pressure of my human blood, which is the opposite of what happens whenever I see one of those tacky bus lanes.