this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
66 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck AI

2837 readers
371 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://fedia.io/m/fuckcars@lemmy.world/t/2201156

In case you were worried about the roads being too safe, you can rest easily knowing that Teslas will be rolling out with unsupervised "Full Self Driving" in a couple days.

It doesn't seem to be going great, even in supervised mode. This one couldn't safely drive down a simple, perfectly straight road in broad daylight :( Veered off the road for no good reason. Glad nobody got badly hurt.

We analyze the onboard camera footage, and try to figure out what went wrong. Turns out, a lot. We also talk through how camera-only autonomous cars work, Tesla's upcoming autonomous taxi rollout, and how AI hallucinations figure into everything.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 3 points 1 hour ago

I want to go back to early 2010s when all this tech was so cool and promising.

miss that optimism

[–] princessaine@lemm.ee 0 points 1 hour ago

no one seems to be questioning why exactly we need self driving cars in the first place. cars are an absolutely horrendous way to handle personal transportation already why add self driving on top of that

[–] boydster@sh.itjust.works 14 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

There's a lot wrong with Tesla's implementation here, so I'm going to zoom in on one in particular. It is outright negligent to decide against using LIDAR on something like a car that you want to be autonomous. Maybe if this car had sensors to map out 3D space, that would help it move more successfully through 3D space?

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 3 hours ago

Tesla ~~Full-Self Driving~~ Driver Veers Off Road, Hits Tree, and Flips Car for No Obvious Reason

FTFY

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 17 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The obvious reason is that the product is not capable of driving itself.

That system has no awareness that it's a motor vehicle.

It has the capacity to execute instructions.

It has no capacity to judge if the instructions are reasonable.

It does not know, understand, or care if it gets you to your destination or if it kills you, or itself.

No cruelty, just executing instructions.

[–] kubica@fedia.io 0 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Nuh-uh you are hating on AI without reason.

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago

The AI is completely unaware of the significance of my hurtful words about its capacity.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I'm excited for the "self-driving" tractor trailers...

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago

i love tessler

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 hours ago

Plot twist: the drivers name was John Connor

[–] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 hours ago

Read the headline as "flips off car" and was pleased to see they hit a new milestone in mimicking human drivers.