the web is already destroyed with all the spam, commercial crap, tracking and spying
this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2025
186 points (97.9% liked)
Technology
72049 readers
2361 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
But the people making money off of all of that are mad now, hence this article.
Yeah. smallest violin plays in the distance
At this point, I'm pretty sure the violinist is on our side, and is no longer to playing for them.
What is dead may never die.
“About to”?
Google disagrees. In fact, the company tells the BBC that AI Overviews have been good for the web, and AI Mode will be no different. Google insists these features send users to "a greater diversity of websites" and the traffic is "higher quality" because people spend more time on the links they click.
However, the company hasn't provided data to back up these claims.
This is how we know they are lying.
Google disagrees. In fact, the company tells the BBC “Trust us, bro.”
Non-AI summary.
More time per click is such a useless metric for the end user.
I could spend a lot of time sifting through ads, nag screens and bullshit to find the actual detail I want on a webpage.
Or validating source, making sure it isn't AI content which usually regurgitates the same talking points. Homogenizing the entire query and removing actual information variance of personal experience.
Damn, thats fuckin' metal, bro. Also, the text to gif gave me a flashback of ~15 years ago.
feels like its 1998 and I'm listening to MTV while browsing the web on AOL with that gif, lol
I haven't used Google Search in quite a while. It's frankly unusable for finding any useful information for someone like me.
Not sure about the web but Google can for sure Yahoo themselves out of existence.
I miss Yahoo games.
Google only has one game, and it's not even multiplayer. :/
Yahoo games and clubs, groups and search, chat and messenger that had filesharing and video and allowed cross fertilisation between everything. It was becoming the internet, it was set to buy Google and then it just stopped and closed it all down.
Japanese people: oh not again
We're soon going to end up back in the early/mid 90s where the only way to find something is via a internet yellowpages.. only this time, not because search engines dont exist yet, but because they are completely worthless garbage.
Don't forget to put your website on a webring! https://xn--sr8hvo.ws/
Man I miss the old internet..
Someone posted this the other day: https://goodinternetmagazine.com/building-a-slow-web/
I really liked the idea so I quickly made my personal site and put it on the indie webring. It's a tiny community but it's there.
its neat, but its not the same. old internet was more than a thing. it was an era.
Unpopular opinion: The missing business model for websites is killing the web. If there was a platform that would distribute a monthly fee to the websites we visit, the web would be much better.
50% could be allocated through traffic, 50% by choice. I could pay 20€ a month for example. Some would go to lemmy, some to my local newspaper, some to my favorite YouTube channels, authors or bloggers.
If enough people did this, investigative journalism would be funded, product testers wouldn't be reliant on sponsoring and hobbyists could gain serious funding without selling out.
Sounds like you want to nationalise the internet and all its services. :P
If only we could pay for a worthwhile internet via taxes.
All it would take would be a platform that handles the payment and supplies a tracking pixel. Websites could join and become part of it. At the moment, every single publisher has their own payment solution. If I want to read one local article from Houston today and one from Tokyo tomorrow, I won't join two payment plans. I want them to be paid automatically, like when I play a song on Spotify or watch a video on YouTube. Just a decent amount of money instead of paying mostly middlemen.
This sounds exactly like what Brave is/was supposed to be/could have been.
I would love a if there was a standard websites would use to receive donations. An integrated browser addon that track what you visit and gives you a review before distributing funds after each month would be great. It should accumulate money to avoid transaction fees for tiny amounts.
May I introduce you to https://webmonetization.org/ ?
Very interesting. I hope this passes as an actual Standart. I looked around but couldn't find information on how to enable it in the Webbrowser. It just says firefox is not supported.
Nevermind I found the extension will try it again.
On Firefox (my default browser everywhere it's available) I use the Coil extension but seems it's now called InterLedger (Wallet) cf https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/web-monetization-extension/
If you go on my web site https://fabien.benetou.fr/ you should see 3 hearts under the 3D model if it's enabled.
I recommend Kagi. It is a search engine with absolutely no tracking or ads, AI slop filter, an in-house index and a cute doggo. It's a paid search engine (which means you pay with money not with data), but you can give it a try with 300 free searches with no strings attached.
I called this one pretty early on. Let's see if it catches on or tanks the Goog.
Cool, I'll just ditch Google at work as well, then
view more: next ›