this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
310 points (98.7% liked)

politics

24228 readers
2639 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Crybaby

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social 136 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Sounds like my dad after he makes some horrible fascist comment about immigrants being scared or how he thinks black women are ugly or gay people are confused or something equally horrific and I open up about how shit really is bad for people that I know personally and his granddaughters are terrified.

“Can’t we just talk about the good stuff?”

Fuck fascists

Arm yourselves they want you dead.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Civility is often weaponized by fascists. They’ll say and do some horrible things… But they do it with a smile, or do so with an air of pseudo-intellectualism. Then when people reasonably get upset, they cry about people being uncivil and redirect the conversation. It’s a tool to avoid having to defend the indefensible things they say and do.

And the sad part is that a sizable part of the population sees that as a “win” for fascism. Because it allows them to paint their opponents as angry unreasonable shrieking maniacs. Lots of people don’t actually listen to the content of what is being said; They just listen to the vibes. And that pseudo-intellectualism and civility has the vibe-listeners thinking that the fascists are the reasonable ones.

yeah, that matches my experience quite well.

in the case of interviews, these people often try to avoid answering straightforward questions.

the good thing is, they don't have to give an answer. the absence of one also says something. the question is, what do the people think? they have to make up their minds.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago

“I just wanted a light-hearted conversation talking about my horrible views towards marginalized people and you’re over there bringing the mood down!”

My best friend’s dad will just randomly bring up the weirdest and most unrelated to the conversation attacks on even centrist institutions, like a joke he thinks is funny, but you mention something connected, especially if it’s in a more serious tone, and he’ll be like “what does that have to do with anything?”

[–] HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

gay people are confused

Methinks your dad's a wee bit bi

[–] PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] damdy@lemm.ee 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

He’s old now but he used to be real good looking

[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Fuck fascists

Oh come on... Sometimes they\re midly funny: https://youtu.be/-iegYa6wTeg

Or not, come to think of it...

[–] FerretyFever0@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago

Looked at the comments. About what you'd expect.

[–] DarkDecay@lemmy.world 43 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Be a man and answer the fucking questions. My God that guy is such a little bitch

[–] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

It's not even a negative question really. It boils down to "what do you say to the people who disagree with what your are doing/planning on doing?"

Oooooh the horror of confronting the very idea of people disagreeing with you. What a nasty question.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 35 points 23 hours ago

Definitely how a strong, confident, popular person would respond.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago

Trump is such a coward, he even ran away from the G7 instead of facing the Mexican President

Trump is a sad sad incel

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 24 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] OCATMBBL@lemmy.world 11 points 20 hours ago
[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The fuck? The politicians I support most are Warren and Ocasio-Cortez but I would never describe my relationship with them as “I am in love with them” and I hope to god that they would never describe their relationship to me that way either. Why would he ever describe politician-supporter relationships as “in love”???

[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He’s a narcissist, everyone loves him!

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

Loves? Sure. IN love? That’s weird

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 6 points 20 hours ago

I've thought about this a lot, and I have a theory - It's a sign of his Sociopathic/ Psychopathic personality. He's a severely broken human being, and a textbook example of a sociopath/psychopath, which includes a lack of understanding of all emotions. He doesn't understand how people feel about things, and doesn't understand the meanings of descriptive emotional words like Love or Beautiful. Because he can't feel those things, he literally doesn't understand what they mean.

OTOH, like most psychopaths, he is aware that others think differently than him, and so he needs to fit in by pretending to understand those concepts. But since he has always been a wealthy arrogant bully, he never really had to learn that skill to survive, he'd do fine even if every one knows he's a psycho, so he's never tried that hard. He still pays it lip service though, so he sprinkles those words in occasionally, hoping he's using them properly, because he can't be bothered to really care that much.

That's why we end up with awkward, cringy statements about him and the fat Korean fuckjob "trading beautiful love letters" and "falling in love," or the "big, beautiful bill," or this amazing sentence:

"I don't think that a beautiful baby girl needs – that's 11 years old – needs to have 30 dolls,"

He just referred to an 11 year old girl as beautiful and a baby, in the same sentence. Not creepy or weird at all. /s

He thinks he is hiding among us by using those normal words, but he uses them so inappropriately that it only draws our attention to how deficient his personality is.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

I'm old enough to remember when people voted for politicians without being considered nor wanting to be considered "supporters" of them.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 9 points 21 hours ago

I mean that’s generally how I am too, I just support Warren and AOC because they generally seem to make good evidence based decisions…

Wow, typing that out made me realize how low the bar is now

[–] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

Trump is such a snowflake

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

when you elect a 80 year old with the mental age of a spoiled 5 year old

[–] Hoohoo@fedia.io 11 points 1 day ago

Toddler decries peas!

He'll threaten and sue CBS for $billions for allegedly softballing Kamala....

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 23 hours ago

That's correct. He's a big fat stinking turd.