this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
353 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

71799 readers
3987 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ep1cFac3pa1m@lemmy.world 105 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Isn’t a “persistent spike” just an increase?

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 50 points 2 days ago (2 children)

An increase that never stops increasing.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Who'd have guessed that Musk's promise to "maximize free speech" was just a dogwhistle to allow the worst of society to say all the worst things with no pushback.

Oh yeah I guess everyone guessed that. None of these fucks cares about "free speech" they want "free speech without consequences specifically for me, but definitely consequences for the speech of people I don't like."

[–] ter_maxima@jlai.lu 6 points 2 days ago

Turns out "free speech" on a platform controlled by one guy can only ever be a lie.

[–] Goretantath@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

And a rapid one.

[–] lars@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 day ago

So delighted (probably not the right word, feeling) that this was the top comment when I arrived.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 61 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well yeah site own by a nazi.

[–] BoycottPro@lemm.ee 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)

100%! I'm sure you're not using it but if you have friends/family still on there urge them to quit using Twitter.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No one I personally know uses it. I quit the moment he bought Twitter.

[–] BoycottPro@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

That's excellent! Hopefully there will be more and more people who don't know anyone who uses Twitter.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

I don't really hear many talk about social media. But that's because I don't go on anything but this. I definitely don't talk about it in every day conversation either.

“Persistent spike” isn’t a spike. That’s the status quo.

[–] BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Then it's not a spike, it's a trend. Created by, mostly (hopefully) bots, there to move the overton window and normalise racism and hyper-regressive world views to divide the working class while the rich use us as Cannon fodder for their genocide against our fellow working class. Wankers.

[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Its working, horrifyingly. In several communities lately ive seen moderators start to treat violent racism and antisemitism as personal beliefs that do not on their own necessitate banning. This in private progressive leaning communities too. Eugencist christian white nationalism is becoming a normal tolerated ideology to have.

Instagram is especially bad too. I see a lot of people talking about Twitter, but not enough about Instagram.

[–] Geodad@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago

In other news, grass is green.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 20 points 2 days ago

Nazi bar doing Nazi bar things.

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

I wouldn't say it's a "spike", Bob.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

So if you do nothing to prevent a problem, and In fact, actively encourage the problem, it gets worse?

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

No shit. Really?

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 8 points 2 days ago

'Persistent spike' is up there with 'vehicle constantly stopping' as a nonsense phrase. :) And this from an educational institution?

[–] SalamenceFury@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Surprise surprise, when the CEO is a Nazi, Nazis think it's free eats!

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

X is for nazis. Tell your friends.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 11 points 2 days ago

Tesla, too!

Elon Musk doing a Nazi salute on the stage at the 2025 US presidential inauguration.

I'd leave it for good if there were non *chan alternatives with anywhere nearly as much hatred and drama

[–] MemmingenFan923@feddit.org 11 points 2 days ago

Leaving X(/Twitter) is one of the best thing you can do for your mental health

[–] BlueZen@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Study also finds that the sky is blue.

[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 days ago

Study also finds that fire is hot.

[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Anyone still on Twitter is fine hanging out in a Nazi bar.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Somehow, the most reasonable account on Vichy Twitter is Grok because it’s hard to train an LLM using only data dumbasses wrote.

[–] BoycottPro@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

Sadly that's going to change. Musk is going to push an update that I suspect will turn Grok into a far-right disinformation parrot or become closer to that. See https://lemm.ee/post/67429541 and https://lemm.ee/post/67216433

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

considering the ceo, linda yaccarino, spends all day retweeting conspiracy theories and nazi propaganda i'm not surprised.

[–] BoycottPro@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago

I wasn't aware of this before. No wonder Musk felt comfortable stepping down as CEO, he just appointed a like-minded person.

The new analysis contradicts the social media platform’s claims that exposure to hate speech and bot-like activity decreased during Elon Musk’s tenure.

They might both be right. I know my exposure to hate speech and bot-like activity decreased since I stopped engaging with that platform.

[–] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago

You just now found out about this?

[–] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Will someone tell the 60% bot userbase?

[–] Pro@programming.dev 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Article Date: February 13, 2025

Numerous studies have reported an increase in hate speech on X (formerly Twitter) in the months immediately following Elon Musk’s acquisition of the platform on October 27th, 2022; relatedly, despite Musk’s pledge to “defeat the spam bots,” a recent study reported no substantial change in the concentration of inauthentic accounts. However, it is not known whether any of these trends endured. We address this by examining material posted on X from the beginning of 2022 through June 2023, the period that includes Musk’s full tenure as CEO. We find that the increase in hate speech just before Musk bought X persisted until at least May of 2023, with the weekly rate of hate speech being approximately 50% higher than the months preceding his purchase, although this increase cannot be directly attributed to any policy at X. The increase is seen across multiple dimensions of hate, including racism, homophobia, and transphobia. Moreover, there is a doubling of hate post “likes,” indicating increased engagement with hate posts. In addition to measuring hate speech, we also measure the presence of inauthentic accounts on the platform; these accounts are often used in spam and malicious information campaigns. We find no reduction (and a possible increase) in activity by these users after Musk purchased X, which could point to further negative outcomes, such as the potential for scams, interference in elections, or harm to public health campaigns. Overall, the long-term increase in hate speech, and the prevalence of potentially inauthentic accounts, are concerning, as these factors can undermine safe and democratic online environments, and increase the risk of offline harms.

[–] Goretantath@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago