this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
749 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

72137 readers
3104 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The revived No JS Club celebrates websites that don't use Javascript, the powerful but sometimes overused code that's been bloating the web and crashing tabs since 1995. The No CSS Club goes a step further and forbids even a scrap of styling beyond the browser defaults. And there is even the No HTML Club, where you're not even allowed to use HTML. Plain text websites!

The modern web is the pure incarnation of evil. When Satan has a 1v1 with his manager, he confers with the modern web. If Satan is Sauron, then the modern web is Melkor [1]. Every horror that you can imagine is because of the modern web. Modern web is not an existential risk (X-risk), but is an astronomic suffering risk (S-risk) [2]. It is the duty of each and every man, woman, and child to revolt against it. If you're not working on returning civilization to ooga-booga, you're a bad person.

A compromise with the clubs is called for. A hypertext brutalism that uses the raw materials of the web to functional, honest ends while allowing web technologies to support clarity, legibility and accessibility. Compare this notion to the web brutalism of recent times, which started off in similar vein but soon became a self-subverting aesthetic: sites using 2.4MB frameworks to add text-shadow: 40px 40px 0px hotpink to 400kb Helvetica webfonts that were already on your computer.

I also like the idea of implementing "hypotext" as an inversion of hypertext. This would somehow avoid the failure modes of extending the structure of text by failing in other ways that are more fun. But I'm in two minds about whether that would be just a toy (e.g. references banished to metadata, i.e. footnotes are the hypertext) or something more conceptual that uses references to collapse the structure of text rather than extend it (e.g. links are includes and going near them spaghettifies your brain). The term is already in use in a structuralist sense, which is to say there are 2 million words of French I have to read first if I want to get away with any of this.

Republished Under Creative Commons Terms. Boing Boing Original Article.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 178 points 5 days ago (1 children)

JavaScript, AJAX, and modern web frameworks have pushed us away from displaying information in a pure and clean way. We need to go back to a better time!

Looks at no-HTML websites

Shit, we've gone back too far!

[–] b_tr3e@feddit.org 76 points 5 days ago (17 children)

CSS on the other hand is quite essential to separate layout from content. Which is a good thing, so I can't really think of a reason for a "no-CSS" rule. Specifically if you can use inline styles as well but in a way more messy way.

[–] garretble@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

CSS is useful but also the devil.

[–] SonOfAntenora@lemmy.world 22 points 5 days ago (2 children)

CSS is mostly evil when you have to center elements in the page.

[–] garretble@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago (15 children)

text-align: center

or

margin: auto

or

grid

or

flexbox

It's really not that hard now.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] vantablack@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] tehBishop@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

Those websites are amazing, thank you.

I checked the source to find the song only to realized I already had it in my playlist 😂

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

That is made by someone who had a Geocities website, or went 1000% in on MySpace back in the day.

[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 53 points 5 days ago (8 children)

"No HTML club" is kinda going too far on the Web. If you go there you might as well start a No HTTP Club and serve stuff over Gopher and FTP.

But we definitely need an HTML 2.0 Club.

[–] ChuckTheMonkey@fedia.io 17 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Might as well do no digital club and we exchange information through mail and pigeons.

[–] DripSlipBoogie@lemm.ee 9 points 5 days ago

There's an rfc for that

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Too much information.
Back to smoke signals.

Wait. You know what? Back to monke!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jpeps@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Yeah it's not exactly going to be WCAG AAA either.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Matriks404@lemmy.world 38 points 5 days ago (6 children)

What we need is a subset of modern web, without any bloat, especially JS frameworks.

A lot of websites can be static HTML + CSS.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

The subset exists. What you're referring to is an agreement or convention.

[–] fuzzzerd@programming.dev 8 points 5 days ago

Some of these are extreme, but what you're talking about is the https://512kb.club/, just keep it small, but no limits on what you can use.

[–] Vinstaal0@feddit.nl 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

A lot of websites can be static HTML + CSS.

Yeah they can, I can understand you might want to use something like php to not need to edit the footers and headers every page if you ever change them, but still.

I also like how some websites like Amazon.com refuse to add a payment platform which is more than a credit card checkout. Especially because their EU sites do have payment platforms with more options to pay. So then you have an over complicated site already with a lot of bloat and some amount of your consumers can't even pay.

[–] absentbird@lemm.ee 5 points 4 days ago

Then use a site generator like Hugo or Jekyll to stamp out new versions of your site with matching header/footer/etc.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 25 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Get this bs outta here. I write on paper! No one knows my thoughts or feelings!!

[–] stormeuh@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What devilry is this? Written word? Real cultures use oral history to store knowledge!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Absaroka@lemmy.world 56 points 5 days ago (6 children)

I do wonder if we're going to see some websites popping up that kind of hit the reset button on social media and go back to smaller communities of folks with something in common.

I kind of miss the days of actually having online conversations with folks you know are real people (not bots), that aren't trying to be an influencer, or get famous, or some how many money off your interactions.

[–] meejle@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago (8 children)

I think it'll happen, but I don't think it's happening yet.

The unease is already there ("the internet used to be a place"/"why isn't the internet fun any more?" sentiments and #OldWeb #SlowWeb hashtags), but I don't think people are ready to do anything about it.

I'm only one guy, with a small internet following, but I recently had a go at launching a small "Gaymers" webring (well, a simplified version of one). I promoted it on my socials, I laid out why I think it's a good idea, I paid to "Blaze" it on Tumblr – I even emailed some like-minded creators directly.

I rewrote the webpage multiple times, to try to make it more persuasive and more concise. I added a contact form in case people felt uncomfortable emailing me. I loosened the rules to allow commercial websites, as long as they were still independent. I worked hard on the widget and incorporated feedback (made it respect prefers-reduced-motion and made a static version for sites where animation would feel out of place).

I got some good feedback; lots of people said it was interesting, and a good idea. But literally no one joined or expressed any interest in joining. 🤷‍♂️

I'm going to have one more go at promoting it next time I've got money to spare, but I'll most likely end up quietly deleting it along with any evidence it existed, because a webring of one is fucking embarrassing. 💀

I guess if you build it, they will not necessarily come lmao

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] blah3166@piefed.social 9 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Check out the gemini protocol: https://geminiprotocol.net/

It kinda fills that niche of the "old web".

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CriticalMiss@lemmy.world 35 points 5 days ago (4 children)

I can get behind no JS club, I can’t get behind no CSS club.

CSS is 🆒

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 48 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world 39 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Just earlier I was reading about this website hosted on solar power and the extremes they went through to get the website to be simple so very little data is transmitted to save precious watts.

The website https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com/about/the-solar-website/

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] alansuspect@aussie.zone 11 points 4 days ago

JavaScript, the powerful but sometimes overused code

now there's an understatement.

[–] the_wiz@feddit.org 8 points 4 days ago

Just to mention it:

gopher://sdf.org

There is no better place for plain and real content

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I'll say one thing for the No CSS philosophy - at least it eliminates light-colored text on a light-colored background using the thinnest possible font, which is probably the stupidest stylistic trend since the web began.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mad_lentil@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 days ago

I guess all that's left is to form a no-utf club.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 18 points 5 days ago

Pfff, that's nothing. My club doesn't even have a website.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (3 children)

How do you use hyperlinks without HTML?

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 25 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Banthex@feddit.org 23 points 5 days ago (8 children)

Jesus. This is getting out of hand.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] IllNess 18 points 5 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 17 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I am in the "whistling into the phone handset on a dialup connection is the purest form of online communication" club.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] anachrohack@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Oh neat! I'm working on a forum that doesn't use any javascript

load more comments (2 replies)

I fucking hate JavaScript

[–] LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 5 days ago

Might be more accessible than gopherholes and gemini gems(?)

[–] owl 10 points 5 days ago (5 children)

no http club, who is joining?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›