this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
71 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

1148 readers
144 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

See our twin at Reddit

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Ban women from universities, higher education and most white-collar jobs."

"Allow people to privately borrow against the taxable part of the future incomes or other economic activities of their children."

So many execrable takes in one tweet, and that's only two of them. I'm tempted to think he's cynically outrage-farming, but then I remember who he is.

top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aninjury2all@awful.systems 5 points 3 hours ago

Not much else you can say at this point, right? I know Rocky's a long-standing fixture in SneerWorld - with an infamous history in TESCREAL / adjacent spaces - but part of me wants to know how someone could end up like this (something tells me it's really pathetic)

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 9 points 11 hours ago

Somebody didnt do well on tinder

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 22 points 17 hours ago

I always find it weird that someone would just announce to the world that they require government intervention to get a girlfriend.

[–] YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems 34 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

Okay but now I need to once again do a brief rant about the framing of that initial post.

the silicon valley technofascists are the definition of good times breed weak men

You're not wrong about these guys being both morally reprehensible and also deeply pathetic. Please don't take this as any kind of defense on their behalf.

However, the whole "good times breed weak men" meme is itself fascist propaganda about decadence breeding degeneracy originally written by a mediocre science fiction author and has never been a serious theory of History. It's rooted in the same kind of masculinity-through-violence-as-primary-virtue that leads to those dreams of conquest. I sympathize with the desire to show how pathetic these people are by their own standards but it's also critical to not reify the standards themselves in the process.

[–] Seminar2250@awful.systems 4 points 9 hours ago

I appreciate this post very much. Thank you. <3

[–] gerikson@awful.systems 10 points 12 hours ago

This true, but I'm convinced the original poster knows this and is using the term ironically.

[–] bitofhope@awful.systems 11 points 16 hours ago

When you nearly miss the submission deadline for the performative misogyny olympics (genuine opinions only edition). Alsl the problem with everything is that there exist things which are not gambling or are insufficiently unnecessarily high stakes gambling.

[–] sad_detective_man@leminal.space 38 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

damn, how can birth rates be so in peril in a culture that hates sex, women, and children so much? truly I am stumped. we must double down on hating sex, women, and children even more if we are to salvage this situation.

[–] XoGloomnrainbows@mstdn.social 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

@sad_detective_man @TinyTimmyTokyo been seeing alot of anti "kid" "mother" rhetoric going viral on tiktok too :(

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZT6JPPtr1/

[–] XoGloomnrainbows@mstdn.social 6 points 18 hours ago

@sad_detective_man @TinyTimmyTokyo "only listen to women who don't have kids" is the most recent hottake/ low blow.

[–] sailor_sega_saturn@awful.systems 46 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (3 children)

Allow people to privately borrow against the taxable part of the future incomes or other economic activities of their children.

"Sorry Junior, I know you wanted to be an artist but you see back in 2025 I got really really into a gatcha game called Umamusume Pretty Derby and long story short you're legally obligated to become a doctor."

[–] Kepion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

'I know you're upset, you have to know that those pixels were very shiny and I would have been sad for 3 minutes until the next distraction took over me'

[–] Architeuthis@awful.systems 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Grok find me a neoliberal solution to the problem of being unable to monetize your progeny by having your sons till the fields and your daughters sold off.

Also not to give this blather more consideration than it deserves, but someone in the comments notes that since he banned women from higher education, which severely curtails their economic outcomes, this creates a perverse incentive to only have boys that you can borrow against, which isn't that good for increasing the population in the long term.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 16 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I imagine that not only do you get to borrow against your sons’ future incomes as doctors or prompt engineers, but against the wealth of your daughters’ expected husbands.

[–] Soyweiser@awful.systems 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Imagine how messy divorces now suddenly get. (Dont worry I know how they will fix this, just ban divorce!)

[–] scintilla@kbin.earth 21 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

What is it with some people thinking that they own their children even after they are adults.

[–] istewart@awful.systems 10 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Over the last few years, I have fully gotten on board with the idea that the haunting vestige of the idea of people as property is one of the core weaknesses of American society, and the "western civilization" enthusiasts that promote its supremacy.

Of course, there are a lot of other people who have been on board with that point of view for centuries.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago

To those people "love" means "I want more than anything" and not a mutual relationship. They are possessive with everything in their life and that includes their children. They will never see their kids as other people until they are alone on some family holiday. And probably not even then.

They lack empathy. They lack imagination. They act like they lack object permanence with how much they hold onto the things they have.

Some people are just broken that way.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 11 points 22 hours ago

“Make Every Vagina A Clown Car”