That's because they can't read.
this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
457 points (99.1% liked)
politics
24832 readers
1938 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Are we just going to pretend that this hasn't been going on for decades, at least the length of my lifetime, and certainly for long before I was born?
This isn't new, this is standard American politics.
It's because they are... Wait for it... Lying.
And it keeps working, so why would they ever stop?
There needs to be legal and political repercussions for politicians lying or misrepresenting the truth. Doesn't matter if they didn't mean to, then they should've done better research.
I imagine things would be better if all that fillibuster time was converted into them carefully choosing what to say.
I have shower thoughts like this. Unfortunately, every single one ends with doomerism. Where do we find objective truth? Who determines what is true? I used to think humans were decent and smart enough to figure it out. Republicans have proven that to be naivete.
We don't have to fall into pits of objective truth. If you say something, be perfectly explicit about what is a factual statement and what is your opinion. If you're making a factual statement, have a source and make sure the source is credible. Or face penalties when your bunk is debunked.
Science has already tread the path of "attempting to find truth through the consensus of doubts". No need to try and trailblaze.
We don't have to fall into pits of objective truth. If you say something, be perfectly explicit about what is a factual statement and what is your opinion.
All three branches of the US government have been captured by people for whom truth is literally whatever they need it to be in the moment. Thinktanks can vomit up bullshit research to support whatever is necessary, at least delaying resolution and casting doubt on even the most credible, well sourced facts. The media is spineless or complicit.
Or face penalties when your bunk is debunked.
Fucking lol. When you make the laws, control the courts, and have the resources for multi-billion dollar lawsuits debunking is going to take a while, if it ever happens. We'll see if even the Epstein files get swept under the rug like everything else so far.
Science has already tread the path of "attempting to find truth through the consensus of doubts". No need to try and trailblaze.
Ah yes, science has managed to blaze a trail right through the bullshit and convinced the the US that we really need to counteract or at least prepare for climate change, right? We're doing... something... right? We're not just hitting the gas for short term profits, right? Right?
There is a very real danger of having "lies" be a convenient, established tool to eliminate political opponents. Admittedly, these fucking fascists are perfectly willing to blaze their own authoritarian trail, regardless of precedent, and just find some bullshit reason to revoke your citizenship and ship you off to some gulag without due process. 'murica.
Those with power are only looking to make their own truth. Thinktank research. Controlling the news media. Controlling social media. Hell, even trying to dictate reality via prompt engineering and then purposely reducing the quality of search results to encourage people to rely on biased chatbots.
The fascists understand how to poison the well. They understand how to play the system. They know they can manipulate their base. They know they can manipulate their opponents by appealing to their better nature then taking advantage of any good faith granted by them.
The US is different now. It's fucked up beyond anything I could have imagined even a year ago. I don't think standing up for truth and bringing credible sources means anything anymore.
Huh. You were right: you do fall to doomerism quickly.
I cannot be arsed to disassemble someone else's "shit's fucked" mentality this early in the morning, and I refuse to have unearned, foreign ennui stinking up my headspace.
What I said wasn't for Democrat talking points in the next debates. They were things to hammer into the new laws if the government is ever reforged.
There needs to be legal and political repercussions for politicians lying or misrepresenting the truth. Doesn't matter if they didn't mean to, then they should've done better research.
Political repercussions? Absolutely. Legal repercussions, without a need to demonstrate that the lack of truth was intentional? Answer me this: If there were legal repercussions for lying, would the current administration be able use it to substantially burden and damage politicians that stand in it's way? What would prevent them from doing that? How can we ensure that it isn't used to enforce the often referenced concept of a "Ministry of Truth" in a dystopian future not unlike this one?
I just don't think people can handle the responsibility of formally bestowing that kind of power on a government and then ensuring it is filled with people who will not use it for their own ends.
For the last decade I've had my faith in humanity shattered inch by inch, ignored scandal by ignored scandal. I kept thinking "Oh, this, this must open their eyes to what's really happening. There is no way they can ignore such a obvious disconnect with truth and reality!" Ten years later, and I'm watching the Supreme Court dismantle a century or more of legal progress. I'm watching Congress gut funding to programs that our most disenfranchised fellow citizens rely on to survive, enrich the wealthiest citizens, and create a gestapo of loyal racist shitbags. I'm watching both political parties attack the protest of a genocide by an allied country.
The most upset I've seen the country at Trump is right now. Why? Not because anything I already mentioned. It's because even though Trump was Epstein's best friend for a long time... and even though last time Trump was president he let Epstein die while under close watch... we're just absolutely shocked that Trump is now claiming the documentation Epstein was keeping on all the friends and clients he helped rape children isn't worth pursuing and doesn't even exist.
No. I don't think we can handle the responsibility of empowering people the police the truth. I don't know how to even get us to the point where we can know what's true anymore.
Edit: Scratch that last bit. I think the answer is to severely limit wealth and power. If you are rich and powerful enough, you can define what is fact and what is true. That needs to be prevented. Tax the excess, or fucking burn it - I don't care at this point.
A "Ministry of Truth" only works when a force controls all the information and, if global sources of information are controlled the discussion feels moot (from a "putting checks to the government" standpoint).
And absolutely. Corporations legally being people and being "entitled" to "free speech using money" has to be obliterated. It's farcical on its face and enables billionaires to multi-dip on stealing from the populace by siphon away their money and then using those immorally-obtained funds to have an outsized representation as the discretionary force of corporations.
You know how corporations can have a voice? By the people who work in that corporation voting like they already are able to do. That's it.
Uh, really sorry but...
naivete
Lol, I let it auto-complete the last word and didn't look twice.
Doesn't matter if they didn't mean to
Yeah, it does. Social murder should be punished at least as harshly as "regular" murder, but social manslaughter needs to be a lesser category.
Like maybe an accidental first offense that doesn't result in any serious harm means you have to pay a fine, second offense/more harmful results in being ineligible for the next election, all the way to things like "Iraq has WMDs so a million people have to die" or "condoms cause AIDS" getting you the guillotine..
No, if you say inflammatory shit that leads to deaths then it doesn't matter if you didn't mean to. Politicians should be afraid to speak if their words can kill and disenfranchise.
Democrats ahould hold an official press conference, and send out official press releases, declaring that the Republican party is officially dead, and would not be referred to again, except in a historic context. They no longer represent ANY of the foundational tenets of the Republican Party - smaller government, lower taxes, family values, individual liberty, no government interference, etc. - so they can no longer claim to be Republican.
Instead, they are the MAGA Party, whose core tenets include racism, corruption, duplicity, lies, cruelty, ignorance, anti-intellectualism, Nazism, weaponized incompetence, party and societal polarization, revenge, and worse. This is the MAGA Party all the way, and they should have to acknowledge and live with it, whether they like it or not.
The Democrats should take the official position that the Republican Party is dead, and has been replaced by the MAGA Party, and then live by it. Make the MAGAs desperate to reclaim their original identity, and fight to demand and regain their identity as Republicans.
Sounds good, but unfortunately it turns out Republicans were also racist, corrupt, liars, cruel, ignorant, anti-intellectual, Nazi, incompetent, polarized, rapists, christofascist, and child molesters.
It turns out MAGA was Republican all along.
It’s the party of Bad Faith. Everything they say is valueless. Only their actions are meaningful.
Republicans say one thing and do another.
In other breaking news, fire burns. Film at 11.
They also get caught repeatedly taking credit for Democratic bills they voted against.
They’re voting for them which means they like the bills but feel their supporters are dumb.
Feel=know damn well
Ftfy
Republicans are a bunch of liars
Nowhere has that dynamic been more pronounced than with the ultraconservative House Freedom Caucus, whose members have repeatedly threatened to oppose bills before acquiescing under pressure from Trump
Dictatorship? Nah couldn't be. He's just dictating what needs to happen and then threatens credible consequences for resisting his will.
Freedom caucus certainly ain't free from coersion.
You could have run this headline with a different article for pretty much any couple of months in the past 30 or 40 years, easily.
Hey, maybe, if journalists would have actually done that... people would still be watching traditional media in large numbers, outside of the retiree demographic!
I was always taught “actions speak louder than words”
The politicians in congress ( all parities ) only care about helping themselves.