this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
577 points (98.0% liked)

Murdered by Words

2271 readers
76 users here now

Responses that completely destroy the original argument in a way that leaves little to no room for reply - a targeted, well-placed response to another person, organization, or group of people.

The following things are not grounds for murder:

Rules:

  1. Be civil and remember the human. No name calling or insults. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone else.
  2. Discussion is encouraged but arguments are not. Don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.
  3. No bigotry of any kind.
  4. Censor the person info of anyone not in the public eye.
  5. If you break the rules you’ll get one warning before you’re banned.
  6. Enjoy the community in the light hearted way it’s intended.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 63 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

Who benifits from the tariffs? Who pays the tariffs? Did it cost more than 150b to gain 150b?

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 71 points 4 months ago

Broad tariffs are basically a sales tax with many extra steps and massive inefficiencies.

Sales taxes are of course, regressive, they disproportionately harm the poor.

[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 32 points 4 months ago

He and his cronies. Notice how the markets will always spike merely a few hours just before he announces them; certain people know ahead and will buy tons of stocks accordingly. It’s blatant market manipulation, done in plain sight.

These tariffs also gives him the illusion of power over other nations, which he craves most, like the bully he is.

[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 28 points 4 months ago (3 children)

The person or company who imports the goods pays the tariffs. The tariffs go to the US Treasury where they are mixed with other revenue like income tax. The government then spends that money on all of the usual stuff.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Just to add, the company importing those goods then increases prices to make up for the expense, passing the costs to consumers (Americans). I think that is an important note.

[–] shneancy@lemmy.world 32 points 4 months ago (1 children)

so, military and harassing citizens?

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Unmarked vans, black sites, and plain clothes SS don't just grow on trees

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 6 points 4 months ago

(We also will not be spending any of that money on trees)

[–] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So, is there an incentive for the tariff payer to keep cost lower and not pass it on to consumer?

[–] ryedaft@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 months ago

The buyer pays the tariff. There's always an incentive for buyers to keep costs low, tariff or not.

For sellers there might be an incentive to reduce prices under some circumstances:

  1. If the seller can't compete with American products once tariff is added - rarely applicable and you may as well see American products increase their prices to increase profits
  2. If your customers are very price sensitive and might go without your product or find an alternative (so not medication, but some foods perhaps) but you would expect those products to already have low margins so you can't really reduce your prices
[–] Lembot_0004@discuss.online 25 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Trump: I need money. I couldn't care less who will pay it. Can you suggest any other source of free money for my needs? No? Shut up and pay then.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Trump would say "could care less"

or I would assume so, anyways

[–] Lembot_0004@discuss.online 8 points 4 months ago

You can't teach old Trump new covfefes.

[–] henfredemars 4 points 4 months ago

The federal reserve could use the money printer.

Trump: On it! Just need to do something about that damn Powel guy.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but it will all go to Billionaires in the form of shady government contracts. So trickle up economics.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

The up-trickle billionaires are currently living with:

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 10 points 4 months ago

That comma is bearing the weight of a collapsed star.

[–] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 months ago

Yay! We're winning!

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's ok because manufacturing has come back. According to some reich wing people I know..

[–] mondomon@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Manufacturing lies is WAYYY up.

[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 months ago

I wonder who that's all going to

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 4 months ago

You mean to say that you've stolen $150B from working class Americans on the sorts of goods they can't live without, like groceries, home appliances, and the like? Good job!

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I know the guy who designed the wheel they spin when coming up with numbers for the masses.

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 4 months ago

oh but he is going to get rid of income tax.......later.