this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
367 points (92.4% liked)

World News

32285 readers
1 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] _number8_@lemmy.world 89 points 2 years ago (2 children)

aside from the issue of 'prohibition still doesn't work', i don't think giving kids or "underage" adults criminal charges for cigarettes is making anything better for anyone

[–] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 81 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (37 children)

Smoking age is specifically the ability to purchase. There are no criminal/civil charges for underage smoking. The crimes are specifically 1) selling to minors 2) buying for minors.

TL;DR: No one goes/will go to jail for underage smoking. They won’t even get in trouble for buying. The onus is on the vendor OR the legal purchaser who handed them off.

load more comments (37 replies)
[–] genoxidedev1@kbin.social 8 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I know this is pretty radical, but if we made smoking FFA way fewer people should theoretically start smoking in the first place. From my experience when I was still at school most of the people there were only smoking because it's "cool", making smoking legal for everyone should take the coolness factor away at least.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] WheelcharArtist@lemmy.world 48 points 2 years ago (1 children)

how to create a blackmarket with health issues

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] who8mydamnoreos@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago

Sunak should start publicly smoking all the time, then it will be the lamest thing and teen smoking will crater.

[–] Phen@lemmy.eco.br 27 points 2 years ago

No no no, minimum age should increase by 360 days every year, that way people can still have hope that some day they'll be able to smoke. Staying true to how capitalism works.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 27 points 2 years ago (23 children)

....how do 14 year olds get smokes now?

Making it illegal to buy at certain ages has never worked...banning them outright also won't work. You cannot stop people from doing things, no matter how many words you put on paper.

Has the war on drugs not been a thought to these people? It is useless and does nothing.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] quicken@aussie.zone 23 points 2 years ago

New Zealand has done this

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Man the fuck up and outlaw it for everyone instead of this sneaky prohibition that only affect people that can't vote yet. It's such a cowardly, disingenuous way of doing it.

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 29 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Prohibition never works, the best bet is to keep it legal and make it as inconvenient as possible like: raising taxes on tobacco, make it illegal to smoke outside of dedicated zones (Quebec has done it I believe), fine people who litter their cigarette butts (hard to implement but, it might deter a large majority from doing it), keep helping smokers to quit and keep raising awareness for younger people.

[–] nathris@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

This is the way. There are so few places to smoke in BC that I pretty much only ever see people doing it 5 metres from a bus stop.

They are so expensive that the few people that still do it smoke maybe a pack a week.

We even banned the sale of no-nic vape juice because they were becoming a gateway to nicotine addiction for teenagers.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago (6 children)

This method stops current smokers from being criminalised.

If you ban it like prohibition, you will instantaneously create a black market. Continually increasing the age you can buy cigarettes is easier. Everyone that this effects will not have the option to legally create a cigarette habit/addiction.

A straight up outlawing would have the maximum effect. But it would be costly to enforce, whilst increasing overall criminal activity.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pisstoria@hexbear.net 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)

lame. create a legal path to execute the tobacco company execs instead.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Icaria@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (3 children)

NZ already did this and it is the most cowardly way to avoid political blowback.

There's plenty of other options for minimising smoking. A more altruistic way is by lifting people out of poverty and tackling social disintegration, since smokers are overwhelmingly poor and disaffected.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

should rise from 18, by one year every year

If that truly continued every year, that means someone too young to legally smoke could eventually die of old age when the legal smoking age is, say, 90 and they're 89. skeleton-wave

EDIT: I was just tripping out at the idea of "you must be 90 years old to buy this" signs at the supermarket. Surreal image.

[–] h3doublehockeysticks@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] booty@hexbear.net 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yep, the idea is to prevent new kids from getting addicted to this awful shit without hurting people who are already addicted.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.one 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

“We operate a Check-74 policy. If you are lucky enough to look younger than 70, we will ask for ID when buying cigarettes”

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Fishroot@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago

Raising legal age

not be able to buy cigarettes

French people in shamble

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

Big tobacco trying to kill big vape by making it exciting again to smoke and break the law

[–] Mr_nutter_butter@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

So he's nicking what newzeland did ok cool something that he's not going to profit from for a change atleast

[–] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Back in my day we used to smoke up hill both ways in the rain and snow.

[–] Teddybearalleymngr@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago (9 children)

Not a smoker or wannabe one but if someone is just one year behind in their age, they'll never be able to legally smoke with this setup.

[–] h3doublehockeysticks@hexbear.net 28 points 2 years ago

that is the exact point

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 27 points 2 years ago

I believe that's the intention yes.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›