this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2025
458 points (97.3% liked)

US Authoritarianism

1345 readers
114 users here now

ChonkyOwlbear is an Illegitimate Usurper

There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: !thepoliceproblem@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Accurate back then as well.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 31 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The only difference is we had hope we could change it for the better back then.

[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com -3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

It wasn't new so if you had hope then and none now you weren't looking at all the facts.

[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] IvyisAngy@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Also this.

I started being angry about it about the time I became an adult.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It wasn't new, but look where we were. The main things are we had spent years reducing the deficit, we didn't have PAC and Super PACs. There is a large difference between then and now.

[–] sobchak@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Foreign policy was similar (well I guess having the president transparently trying to shakedown every country and large corporation on the planet is new). It's just now all starting to be directed inwards (i.e. "imperial boomerang").

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

2001 was pre Iraq and Afghanistan. Yeah we poked in other countries business and did shady stuff. However, we didn't drain our economy fighting a pointless forever war yet.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Vietnam, and Korea...they'd like a word.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The war that ended in 1975? That was a different era.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Right...a twenty year war doesn't count if it wasn't done within the last 20 years. Got it.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We're looking at the difference between 2001 and 2025. That's a difference off 24 years. You're bringing up something that ended 26 years before that... I'm not saying it doesn't count, but it wasn't the most relevant thing even in 2001. I think the longest peace time in modern US history is more relevant than the decades old war. In fact I would even assert that the peace time was far more important. It was precisely because of this long peace time that we were prosperous and had an optimistic view of the future.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

We've been at war most of the U.S. existence. What are you on about? Literally like 10 years of the U.S. existence has been without a declaration of war.

And its relevant specifically bcz you are referencing forever wars as if the Afghanistan/Iraq invasions are the only ones that ever happened.

[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Thanks for proving my point that the peace time was so important in the context of 2001.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

We’re just more aware now. Why do you think they want to get rid of “leftist media” and censor Wikipedia? Because they mention Charlie Kirk’s racism? Nah buddy it goes WAY deeper than that.

They miss when we all looked at Desert Storm and went “oh well Saddam is bad so I guess we have to do this” instead of “Bibi and Israel are doing a genocide!”

They preferred us blind.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 34 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If we're being real it's only an Okay Satan.

[–] NewDark@lemmings.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Great as in Large, because the Little Satan is Israel.

[–] Soapbox@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Ok Saudi Arabia, pots and kettles buddy.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Didn't they just give the Great Satan's leader a golden airplane and his kids 2 billion dollars?

apologies, the plane was Qatar.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 5 points 3 months ago

Is it Great Satan behavior to bribe The Smelly Vizier of Satan?

I'd have gone with the slavery and sexism thing myself

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Imagine how much better off we’d all be if the US pursued renewables to become truly energy independent so there was no more petrodollar incentive for foreign misadventure. Imagine an end to all the oil wars

[–] cyborganism@piefed.ca 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I kinda had it figured out back then as well.

[–] cabbage@piefed.social 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm guessing by your instance that you're Canadian?

I was just a (European) kid in 2001, and I believed profoundly that Bush was evil and incompetent, but this did not extend to America as such. I didn't understand enough of American history yet to understand that the current situation was not an anomaly. I don't think I truly understood before after Obama.

[–] cyborganism@piefed.ca 1 points 3 months ago

Yeah, when you're neighbours, have a shared history, and consume the majority of their media, you have a better perspective.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Satan was the good guy.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Same with the House of Saud

[–] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

Every generation always thinks they're the first...

To anyone who thinks the OP made a good point: you should read about anti-Vietnam war protests. The Kent state massacre might be a good place to start.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_State_shootings