this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2025
400 points (99.0% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

7928 readers
239 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources, and posts about an article should have the same headline as that article. You may edit your post if the source changes the headline. For a rough idea, check out this list.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

At our Yale Chief Executive Leadership Institute forum, over 100 business leaders said what they really think. They're worried Trump is eroding America’s future.

all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Reality_Suit@lemmy.world 164 points 1 week ago (3 children)

This is exactly what they voted for, and the fact that they can't understand that proves to me that all these financial and business wizards are actually bumbling foolish idiots.

Every semi smart person alive knew all this before the last election, but scared children lead the way.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 40 points 1 week ago

This is exactly what they voted for,

Not necessarily, they could've voted for Harris. This is exactly what they lobbied and abused the working class for decades for. Which was voting with their obscenely large wallets, now that I think about it.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 38 points 1 week ago

They voted for it but they figured they could control Trump like he was a well trained monkey. Turns out it was a senile gorilla set to smash.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah IDK.

It's certainly true that everyone, including economists, have been saying that tariffs are going to be terrible. If anything, the implementation has been far less terrible than everyone thought.

However, I don't think that these CEOs necessarily thought that tariffs were going to increase profits. Corporations have a way of socialising the bad and taking advantage of the good. So in some ways they always benefit from change, including chaos.

For example, and this was alluded to in the article, if you could stock up before the tariffs took effect, then you can increase prices and sell the goods you bought with out tariffs at the tariffed price. Even after you run out of pre-tariff stock, it's the consumers who are paying the tariffs, and it can't last forever, and all your competitors have the same context.

[–] axexrx@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The final step isnt buying on an equal footing as your competitors, its paying a bribe to be tariff exempt, then continuing to sell at tariff inclusive pricing.

The whole tariff scheme was designed as a way to price smaller competitors out of the market, allowing consolidation of market share by the wealthy, while providing cover for price hikes against consumers. Just like covid price hikes, If trump abandoned tariffs today, very few products would return to their prior pricings.

[–] Reality_Suit@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Inflation is completely artificial. Ever increasing profits do not tolerate fluctuations.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 62 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Too fucking late for that, twats. You sold America's future for the hope of lower taxes. Now we all have to pay, and no amount of buyer's remorse will fix it.

[–] db2@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Not just the empty promise of lower taxes, also the temporary unsustainable profits they did get.

[–] Master167@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If only they would put their money where their mouth is and support some opposition candidates. But that would be political and not what “stockholders” want from them.

Why is it that we have CEO’s as leaders when they don’t lead anything?

[–] multifariace@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Shareholders. The stockholders don't matter much.

[–] porksnort@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago

They are leaders! They are first in line when the annual bonuses come out!

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago

Well Mr. CEO, your first step is to stop publicly fellating him.

[–] thoughtfuldragon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Time to make america socialist.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you read the article, you'll see that these fucks want precisely the opposite - or, at least, their view of what socialism is.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

or, at least, their view of what socialism is.

Privatize profits, socialize losses.

[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago

The article quotes them as being worried about Trump's government buying up and controlling their businesses.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They all thought they would be the one who had the most control over Trump.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago

Bingo.

Every business mogual loves a fascist oligarchy until they discover they're on the outside.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Do something about it cowards, bet you won't

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Hey CEOs, open the fucking doors and do something about it. At minimum back one another and stand together to fight back so that targets of the regime dont feel they have to capitulate to the whims of a tyrant or be bankrupted by legal battles for bullshit legal attacks.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 6 points 1 week ago

But don't you see, then they might have to pay taxes.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Telling the only issue they have with gestures outside window is "stonks go down"

[–] Ironfist79@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

The only thing they care about is having the line go up. Forever.

[–] guynamedzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So, MAAA? Oh no, the big bad leopard at your face and now the poor rich people are crying for their mommies? Boohoo

[–] harmbugler@piefed.social 15 points 1 week ago

MAAA is the sound a sheep makes when the wolf has caught it.

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Make America Affordable Again sounds good to me!

[–] i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago

Have the economy you voted for!

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Oh wow, a little buyer’s remorse on the whole “get a businessman to run the country like a business” thing?

[–] Lanske@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Spineless cunts

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 8 points 1 week ago

A Corporate America isn't much better than Fascist America. Technically more fair, but the ideology of sacrificing humanity for one's ego still remains.

Both Klanners and Business Plotters are evil, they just occupy different sides of the alignment chart: Chaotic Evil vs Lawful Evil.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

Nice to know they are catching up

[–] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago

Hope their businesses all fail

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Oh NOW they don’t like him?

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

If they could start saying that with the door open that would be great

[–] DrDickHandler@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago
[–] Krudler@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

So the billionaires running corporations with 1st Amendment Rights (thanks Citizen's United v FEC) didn't become enriched, so the story changes.