this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
242 points (96.9% liked)

World News

50145 readers
2102 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Despite platform’s limits on adult content, study finds it not only accessible but often suggested

TikTok has directed children’s accounts to pornographic content within a small number of clicks, according to a report by a campaign group.

Global Witness set up fake accounts using a 13-year-old’s birth date and turned on the video app’s “restricted mode”, which limits exposure to “sexually suggestive” content.

Researchers found TikTok suggested sexualised and explicit search terms to seven test accounts that were created on clean phones with no search history.

top 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Tiktok was taken over by fanatical Zionist Larry Ellison.

[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 hours ago

Lol speedrunning

[–] Bullerfar@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I fucking hate tiktok. Never understood how this braincaser got allowed into the EU in the first place. Maybe I am just an old angry dumbass, but when I first started using it in my marketing team back in 2019, it just shouted cancer every post I saw. This thing should never been allowed for children. Also, read the terms of the app..

[–] dickalan@lemmy.world -2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Ok. I hope they treat you better in Russia

[–] Bullerfar@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

I am not from russia, wtf are you talking about dude?

[–] falseWhite@programming.dev 3 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

There's porn on tiktok? Have I been missing out??

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Not porn. More like borderline sfw softcore. For a kid it’s more than enough though.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I can't tell if you're being facetious or not but perhaps you don't remember when the biggest "stars" on tiktok were 15 year olds dancing in bikinis....

[–] falseWhite@programming.dev 2 points 6 hours ago

🤮🤮🤮 I have watched maybe 3 tiktok videos in my life

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago

When conservatives run something, children get fucked.

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 68 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Daily reminder to stop using TikTok 🤗

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago
[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

applies to most for profit social media

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago

Social media is pretty unhealthy, honestly. Especially when used excessively, no matter if it's for profit or not.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 14 points 1 day ago

applies to ~~most~~ all for profit social media

[–] twice_hatch@midwest.social 1 points 15 hours ago

Even non-social media. Find some local newspaper that can't afford a website but cares about their readers

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 0 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't look back after switching to rednote the first time Tiktok was threatened.

[–] PanGodofPanic@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I wouldn't exactly put any trust in rednote either

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

If they showed millions of children pornography, the CEO would probably be in prison.

As for rednote being used to amplify narratives supported by the CPC, as an American, that is preferable to any other sizable social media I have access to except discord, where the same occurs except at the behest of the US.

At least when I report nazis on xhs, they get banned.

[–] Corporal_Punishment@feddit.uk 31 points 1 day ago

But its ok. We are making adults provide ID so they can access adult material theyre legally allowed to access- UK government.

[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Are we talking like actual porn on tiktok or just women dancing in bikinis? Because one of those used to be called the MTV channel, and the other was always being accessed by teens with a few clicks.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 3 points 14 hours ago

Actual nudity was never allowed on tiktok. But kink is fine.

[–] JustARaccoon@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

The difference I suppose is deliberately looking for it vs the algorithm feeding it to them

[–] passepartout@feddit.org 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

One more lever to force age verification / personal identification of users.

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 60 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The problem is that they're being served adult content despite the site knowing they're underage, so age verification wouldn't help at all... If anything, this is a demonstration as to why age verification isn't a good solution.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago

If anything, this is a demonstration as to why age verification isn't a good solution.

Won't stop surveillance state bad actors from arguing exactly the opposite, though.

[–] passepartout@feddit.org 14 points 1 day ago

You're absolutely right, but it's not like facts matter anymore in this regard.

[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago

That’s the new MAGA feature

[–] kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago

I'm shocked! Shocked!

[–] LSNLDN@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago

Guardian minimises Israeli genocide while holding Russia to account as it should

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Anyone remember when tiktok was called musically? It was basically a dispo for pedos

[–] blargh513@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I didn't think that this needed to be said, but I suppose it does.

IT IS NOT OK TO FUCK CHILDREN,PULL YOUR DICK OUT AND DO STUFF TO THEM WITH IT OR MAKE THEM DO STUFF WITH YOUR DICK. IT IS NOT OK TO LURE KIDS IN WITH THE END GOAL OF FUCKING OR MOLESTING THEM. THIS IS VERY BAD AND YOU SHOULD NEVER DO IT. RICH WHITE PEOPLE, THIS IS MAINLY FOR YOU.

There, I hope that helps.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

While I agree with your statement, that's not really what this article is about.

[–] blargh513@sh.itjust.works -3 points 1 day ago

I do tend to get off topic.