this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
412 points (92.9% liked)

General Memes & Private Chuckle

121 readers
725 users here now

Welcome to General Memes

Memes for the masses, chuckles for the chosen.

Rule 1: Be Civil, Not CruelWe’re here for laughs, not fights.

  • No harassment, dogpiling, or brigading
  • No bigotry (transphobia, racism, sexism, etc.)
  • Keep it light — argue in the comments, not with insults

Rule 2: No Forbidden FormatsNot every image deserves immortality on the memmlefield. That means:

  • No spam or scams
  • No porn or sexually explicit content
  • No illegal content (seriously, don’t ruin the fun)
  • NSFW memes must be properly tagged

If you see a post that breaks the rules, report it so the mods can take care of it.

Otherwise consider this your call to duty. Get posting or laughing. Up to you

founded 1 week ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 15 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Want a show that holds up? Watch M*A*S*H without the American laugh track. My god it hits hard, totally different show. Guess you Brits and Aussies already knew, but damn, what a fucking masterpiece of drama, every season. I didn't know it wasn't a comedy!

[–] adhocfungus@midwest.social 3 points 14 hours ago

You can get it without the laugh track? I've actually been thinking about MASH lately, so this would be a good way to watch it. How do you search for that? Do you search for a specific language/region or what?

[–] SlartyBartFast@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Hupf@feddit.org 4 points 13 hours ago
[–] biotin7@sopuli.xyz 10 points 20 hours ago

I rather watch The Expanse

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

It was in the 90s. Then somewhere in the early 2000s somebody came up with the idea to write a sitcom, that the audience laughs at instead of the laugh track.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

That was a nice serie, in the 1990s...

HA HA HA HA Ross!!!

It's aged not so well.

[–] Gustephan@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago (21 children)
[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Good god that show sucks so much. Glad somebody finally said it. I thought the whole world had gone crazy. Their other show, Parks and Rec, was considerably more entertaining.

[–] dingleberrylover@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

I like how Steve Carell plays out Michael, and I enjoy Dwight as well. But the rest really is nothing special. The whole Jim and Pam story arc was more annoying than anything.

It is crazy how good Parcs & Rec is compared to the office.

[–] Pieisawesome@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 hours ago

Especially after they get married and they have to keep inventing Jim and Pam conflict to keep their arc “interesting”

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I love parks and rec, because every character is interesting. The office has like 3 and a half good characters

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The Season 2 Christmas episode where Michael makes everyone play Yankee Swap and then gets them hammered to smooth things over is a classic. I'd say seasons 2-4 were good. Then it nosedived.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 64 points 1 day ago (10 children)

I saw some clips of Friends in which the laugh track had been edited out. Let me just say that this meme is well-justified.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Geodad@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Friends was one of the dumbest shows my ex has ever made me watch. When she tried to make me watch Seinfeld, I knew it wasn't going to work out.

[–] dingleberrylover@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I genuinly enjoyed Seinfeld, although I don't think that it would be at my top three funniest TV shows. Friends however, I couldn't get into it.

[–] veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

As a kid, I didnt really understand the jokes or plot but parents would watch it all the time, and it had me thinking it was some sort of high brow humor I was too young to understand.

Then I watched it as an adult and realize there's some kids shows more witty and funny (e.g. The Weekenders) then the vapidity and fake-intensity reactions each episode has.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I could not deal with either of those shows either. People finally stopped asking me if I had "seen last nights episode".

[–] Stalinwolf@lemmy.ca 3 points 16 hours ago

"Did last night's episode have Jerry's hair? Jerry's teeth? A bunch of stupid fucking slap bass? Then no, I didn't watch that shit."

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Watching sitcoms from decades past through a modern lens is difficult.

Most 90s sitcoms haven't aged well at all. Multi-cam 3-wall sitcom in general don't. Single-cam higher quality production that aren't trying to replicate the old variety show live-theatre format have come around.

Sanford and Sons, Full House, and Cheers were really popular, but have aged poorly.

But things like MASH (especiallythe seasons after they dropped the laugh track), Arrested Development, and Scrubs have done really well because they didn't have an identity crisis between theatre and film.

Full House

My housemates played a practical joke on me back then where they were all watching Full House when I came home and rolling around on the floor laughing hysterically at everything. It was a scene where one of the Olsen twins had planted an M&M and was trying to grown an M&M tree. I was mystified at what was so funny until I grabbed the bong.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] criticon@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 day ago (5 children)

You can't just watch friends for the first time in 2025, it's a bad show. You can maybe rewatch for the nostalgia but the show was clever at its time and paved a lot of way for another sitcoms.

It's similar to breaking bad, if you are just watching for the first time you may not find it appealing, but it was great in 2008 and new shows took inspiration from Gillian's direction

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I always found it immersion breaking that they lived in the massive place they did, and that was before I released it was set in New York of all cities. Like all sitcoms tended to gloss over money but Friends was just a step to far for me.

[–] CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It’s been addressed in the show. Ross and Chandler have good jobs. Joey eventually gets a stable acting job but is usually short on cash. Monica’s apartment is illegally occupied and rent controlled from when her grandmother lived there.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago

True, I found Seinfeld way more interesting.

load more comments
view more: next ›