this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2025
333 points (98.8% liked)

politics

25970 readers
2355 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 48 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I like how "american farmers" sounds like helping the little guy. No. Just another corporate bailout, nothing to see here.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Liberal America still envisions old dudes in overalls growing carrots in a small field, a single tear rolling down their cheek as their 6 children look on with empty bowls.

Rather than almost completely industrialized corn factories producing the raw materials for overseas ethanol production.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That view is confined to liberals?

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

No, but middle-class liberal america are still the country's actual breadbasket, and the ones who are most easily influenced with simplistic imagery and narratives, so that's who these stories are designed to appeal to. It would really, really twist official narratives if America broadly realized that some industries get socialism and others don't.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 3 points 2 days ago

exactly. I would rather see all incentives removed and let those companies choke on their land grabs.

[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 188 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Fuckin welfare states. Pick yourselves up by the bootstraps you fuckin "without us America is nothing" fuck boys. I'm tired of these red states hurting people and still getting handouts.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 71 points 3 days ago (12 children)

I always have to laugh when I'd see people online arguing for rural areas/rural states and getting chapped about states being called "flyover states". They'd start with that "but WE supply your food! The people in the cities would starve without us!"

WTAF. Get outta here with that shit. First of all, most of what I eat comes from Mexico and California. Secondly, it's not as if these people are supplying food out of a sense of altruism. They act like they are really doing something truly noble and everyone else should bow and scrape over their racist bullshit because of that?

These people are going to really not know what to say as automation really, really starts taking flight for these kinds of jobs (why we started applying AI to things like white collar jobs first I have no idea). I know for a fact that full, end-to-end automation is a goal of the coal industry and it sure as hell is one for farming, too, as I saw a presentation on it being made several years ago. In any case, it's going to be hard for these morons that happen to live near corporations extracting food from the land act like they should call the shots on how most Americans live their lives.

These assholes have been unable to deal with the reality that most Americans live in cities and have for quite some time....they just have not caught up. But these people think a minority are "real murica".

[–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

as automation really, really starts taking flight for these kinds of jobs (why we started applying AI to things like white collar jobs first I have no idea)

They are, though? And it has massively changed the dynamics in agriculture. They just don't make headlines because they're technical behind-the-scenes stuff

It's something that annoys me a bit when everyone started talking about AI, but only really a small part of it, and then thinking that's the be-all-end-all of the field. It never was, and still isn't. People just don't know about the rest, and don't read up on it either

Side note: farming is an area where the "Internet of Things" is used extensively as well, but when people think of IoT, they similarly only think about smart homes. Same problem as well

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Slinging that welfare to the farmers. SSDD.

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 50 points 3 days ago (2 children)

A government handout? Lazy no good farmers taking my taxes. Pull yourself up by your bootstraps. Stop buying Starbucks. And most importantly, stop voting for gop pedophiles.

[–] Mediocre_Bard@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

Fuck those guys. Taking money from the blue states. Get a real job.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

Stop growing avocados and making toast!

[–] StewNasty@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 3 days ago (1 children)

They say you have to bury a farmer 10 feet down to prevent their arm from popping out of the ground to collect another handout.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Or you could feed them to the wood chipper

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago

Ah, the good old socialist handouts!

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 75 points 3 days ago (1 children)

For this large of a bailout, my groceries should be free.

[–] MrVilliam@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 days ago (4 children)

No, socialism is only for corporations and now farmers too I guess.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago (1 children)

While the MAGAt fucks continue to cry about SOCIALISM.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 33 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Don't worry 90% of it will go to Cargill, ADM, Tyson, Smithfield, John Deere, and Bayer/Monsanto.

All the remaining small farms will fight over the scraps and then get bought out by one of the first four, depending on what they farm...or be entirely under the thumb of the other two.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That was really the idea all along. Consolidation of wealth and power.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

I'm guessing most farmers will be allowed to stay in their homes and manage their fields while the big ag companies take all their yield and pay out a meager salary.

They'll call it "franchise farming" or something catchy, but it's really gonna be Indentured Servants 2.0.

[–] _core@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

JD Vance has investments in companies that buy out farms from farmers. He says the farms will continue to be run by experts (ie the farmers he bought the farms from)

[–] _core@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

AcreTrader is the company

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 6 points 2 days ago

Corporate Sharecropping

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 38 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We paid out 20 billion dollars to Argentina, fucked over a bunch of American soy bean farmers in MAGA country and so he's paying them another 10 billion to not turn on him. Cool.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 50 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Bail them out now, and then what? Their international customers aren't coming back if they already found comparable trade partners elsewhere, and the non-billionaires here are tapped out from high food prices. Won't they just need another bailout sooner than later?

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 43 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It’s actually quite simple. Bail them out now, wait for the midterms. Let the farmers go bankrupt next year so mega corporations buy up their foreclosed fam land. Then the mega corporations and billionaires get to privatize the profits and socialize the loses. There’s no better investment than that.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Yep. They get to "own the libs", but the megacorporations will get to own their farms. Cons are not really great at thinking shit through. Being the emotionally flighty people that they are, but ironically, calling everyone to their left a "snowflake", they are easily manipulated....

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago

What about everyone else’s wallets that have been hurt by his decisions?

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 41 points 3 days ago

No, this is yet another bullshit excuse to feed money to the already wealthy megacorps that are in the Ag business. Small farmers won't get a damn thing, just like last time.

[–] renrenPDX@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 3 days ago

It's okay guys, Trump has gained 17 TRILLION from tariffs. Biden? 1 Trillion, Trump, 17 trillion in 8 months! Imagine that!

/dripping with orange sarcasm

Welfare queens

[–] KingPapaDaddy@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago

Last time it cost us $26 billion because of his stupid tariffs. Why can't he just go play golf

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 32 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think I heard some woman politician on an older podcast episode from Thom Hartmann who was talking about sitting down with conservatives in her state and why they voted for Donvict, even though they knew he would start another trade war that would harm them - they figured he would just bail them out again.

[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There is a video of a farmer saying the same thing. They knew they would get bailed out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

They should just do this monthly, but have regulations to figure out how people can not abuse it, but then you need offices and checks and balances... Maybe even government agencies....Wait a minute....

Like, all jokes aside, as reckless as this all is, at least maybe they DO get there?

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago

2 terms, 2 bailouts for farmers.

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

No. Let them fail. Show us the actual results of your asinine "free market" policies for once.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago
[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

You mean make the US taxpayers pay them instead? Get one of his buddies he had fleece the stock market to the tune of hundreds of billions pay for it. Fuck these guys. I'm not paying federal tax these next four years.

Saw this on (slight retch) reddit, might be helpful to you:

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MdRuckus@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

A solution for a problem he created.

load more comments (1 replies)

Cause the problem.

Use tax payers money to fix it.

And then he’ll take credit for fixing it.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 days ago

All those Trump-voting farmers in red states sure hate us blue state folks but they love our money.

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Sooooo much winning everywhere!

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

Trump has another ~~solution~~ problem to every problem.

load more comments
view more: next ›