this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2025
132 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26020 readers
1914 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Many experts are forecasting the end of a key provision of election law — enabling Republicans to shore up their advantage in the House, according to a new report.

Ahead of the court’s Oct. 15 rehearing of Louisiana v. Callais — a case that has major implications for the VRA — two voting rights groups are sounding the alarm, warning that eliminating Section 2, a provision that prohibits racial gerrymandering when it dilutes minority voting power, would let Republicans redraw up to 19 House seats to favor the party and crush minority representation in Congress.

Bye bye free and fair elections by the midterms! And people called me crazy for predicting this.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 35 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's why I will never understand the "just burn it down" crowd. That burn is going to take decades, lifetimes to happen. It's going to be slow and agonizing for millions as civil rights dwindle and fascism keeps creeping further into every corner of the country, until that becomes the next generations' new normal.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If we let the banks fail we'd be just about back to normal life by now.

Shit, I'd bet the odds of me owning a home in 2030 are higher if we let them fail in 08 than they are currently.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

If we let the banks fail we’d be just about back to normal life by now.

Famously, when a national economy falls off a cliff, history just stops until its put back together again.

Shit, I’d bet the odds of me owning a home in 2030 are higher if we let them fail in 08 than they are currently.

The problem with a private real estate market is that the richest man in the room always wins. Letting the investment banks fail in '08 would have produced a different crop of richest men. But you'd be foolish to conclude plutocrats wouldn't still be setting dogshit policy nationally in this alternate timeline.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 6 points 4 days ago

As someone from a global south neighbor put it: the West will have the same misery people like them have had, and the only thing to do is organize.

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago

Uncle Tom Clarence is gleefully rubbing his hands together.

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"No one could have predicted this."

[–] Zagam@piefed.social 7 points 4 days ago

Pffft. The only people that predicted this was everyone. That's hardly a robust sample size.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 10 points 4 days ago

That's pretty much bye bye house like forever no? ...cool cool cool

[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Why cant the Dems do the same thing to the GOP?

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago

One reason is because GOP holds more state governments, but the other reason is that blue states put up safeguards, like independent commissions, to legitimize their states voting practices. CA is an example already, they need a proposition to pass while TX can simply gerrymander freely.

[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

SCOTUS will find a reason.

[–] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 days ago

Even getting there would require the dems to want to do something

[–] whiwake@lemmy.cafe 6 points 4 days ago

You’re not crazy. You’re right.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I'm being told that they only win those seats if the Dang Leftists betray us like they did last time.