this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2025
1168 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

76132 readers
2827 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Octavio@lemmy.world 31 points 5 days ago

The funny thing about people who say it’s not a bubble because AI has value is that the asset category having value doesn’t prevent valuation bubbles from forming.

Houses have value: you can live in them. Yet there was a housing bubble.

The internet has value: you can watch cat videos on it. Yet there was a dot com bubble.

Tulip bulbs have value: you can grow pretty flowers with them. Yet there was a tulip bulb bubble.

In my experience, whenever you start reading news stories asking if something is a bubble and quoting investment bankers say, “no, it’s not a bubble,” well, usually it’s a bubble.

[–] GrammarPolice@lemmy.world 49 points 6 days ago (3 children)

NVIDIA really out here selling shovels in the gold Rush

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Nvidia are very smart in that regard, ethics aside. Very early on they decided that selling cards to gamers will not give them the infinite growth everyone so desperately desire, so they started looking for what does, and they were consistent at it ever since. Every tech bubble of the recent history is powered by Nvidia cards. How much they contributed to the hype (and damage) is not entirely clear, but that's not zero for sure

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

They lucked into it. They made their cards for gamers, and various groups, AI researchers, bitcoin miners and others, discovered that they those gamer GPUs were really good for other tasks too. I think it took a while before Nvidia started making specialised cards for those purposes.

I can't really blame them for serving that market that they just lucked into. I can and will blame them for their terrible Linux support.

[–] cornshark@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

If it's just luck why isn't AMD rolling in it with their cards?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] llama@lemmy.zip 51 points 6 days ago (7 children)

If Lemmy is supposed to be the place where the most tech savvy people in the interest congregate, and everyone in the comments is unsatisfied with AI then we really do have a problem. These companies have all reached a point where they no longer listen to their most informed customer base but instead take 100% of direction from investors who don't even know what they want except a line going up.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 12 points 6 days ago

Investments and income have been divorced from reality for a while now, bud.

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Eh. Lemmy has a lot of ignorance surrounding technology and science compared to other sites. Hacker News is what you're looking for if you want somewhere that is full of the most tech savvy people on the Internet, and most of them are extremely pro AI (with some weird AI cultishness alongside). Myself I think AI is a bubble but there is a lot of promise in the underlying technology once you take away the hype, just like the .com bubble at the turn of the century.

[–] Bunbury@feddit.nl 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I am not sure if you have discussed AI in a room full of hackers recently, lol. I have. Maybe 1/100 is pro-Generative AI in my estimation:

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

Too many people equate AI with LLMs only. LLMs are mostly bubbled bullshit, with a few limited use cases. But AI is a much broader topic. The really scary AI is the stuff we hear little to nothing about.

People also forget how dramatically tech can advance over time. Spoiled impatient Americans in particular want a finished product or they quickly write it off as "garbage". They forget every product we own and use was once "garbage".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (5 children)

If Lemmy is supposed to be the place where the most tech savvy people in the interest congregate

Says who? Mostly feels more like sales than R&D here. Which kinda fits with these pitches.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] dick_fineman@discuss.online 9 points 6 days ago (8 children)

I thought it was the place for people who didn't want their shitposting interrupted by random child porn. Am...am I in the wrong place???

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 23 points 5 days ago (9 children)

Hold up everyone. It's not a bubble.

"So it is true that valuations are high but, in our view, generally not at levels that are as high as are typically seen at the height of a financial bubble," said Goldman Sachs strategist Peter Oppenheimer.

He's from GOLDMAN SACHS LOLOLOLO I THINK THEY WOULD RECOGNIZE A BUBBLE LOL ah fuck me our economy is gonna splode

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 46 points 6 days ago (1 children)

People need housing, no one needs this AI crap. Even in boring engineering jobs using tools that solved problems decades ago, we are getting AI shoveled in left and right in places no one needs or wants it. And calling old features "AI" is also another problem.

And now these stupid "barking bears attacking fat sleeping people" videos are everywhere, and people seem to think they're real.

We should focus on natural intelligence first, that is to say each other, and education...

Oh and the headline should read "Every day", "everyday" is an adjective, like an everyday occurence.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 36 points 6 days ago (3 children)
[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 36 points 6 days ago (9 children)

The GDP issue is not because of the AI bubble, it's because of tariffs and the complete destruction of US soft power abroad

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago (2 children)

And I would almost bet the crash will be about the time the Dems take power, just so the Republicans can whine about the situation they created and blame the Democrats for it.

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 13 points 6 days ago

The problem with this theory is that it assumes Republicans will give up power to allow the Democrats to govern.

The part of Republicans blaming Democrats is spot on.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] xylogx@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

There is definitely a bubble. But also what Nvidia is doing is smart. They have boatloads of cash. They are investing that cash in the companies that are using their products to create money making services. If one of them can create a killer app or viable service this will create demand for their products and they will have an ownership stake in it. Is this guaranteed or even likely? Probably not. We have reached the point where we were in 1996 where the chairman of the fed came out and said we are in a period of "irrational exuberance." That bubble took four more years to pop. This one may end quicker, but it is impossible to tell when it will end or what will come out of it from where we sit today.

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 6 days ago (3 children)

doesn't look a goddamn thing like the housing bubble

[–] PmMeFrogMemes@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Can confirm, circles look like bubbles.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

I suppose similar in the sense that the housing bubble involved a bunch of rich idiots speculating on bad debt that had been vaguely washed to make it look good and now we have a bunch of rich idiots speculating on AI based on vague promises that it'll be good.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ATS1312@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

But where is Palantir on this? Because they're discernibly connected to several of these orgs, and that displays the character of what this is actually about.

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago (21 children)

But what will be left after it bursts? At least in cause of the housing bubble - the houses existed physically - what will be after the AI crash? Lots of spare gear sold for cheap?

[–] commander@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago (4 children)

The s&p 500 tanks a ton and banks call on loans from these AI hyped companies using the price of the stocks as collateral (previously expected to rise). Credit crunch and now companies tighten the belts even further so higher unemployment again. Federal funds rate gets slashed and those that can manage steady good work during the recovery years will be fine. Everyone else will be struggle busing as usual

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] witx@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

A bunch of brain dead junior Devs who cannot think for themselves

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 13 points 6 days ago (8 children)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

But what will be left after it bursts?

Affordable GPUs? Less pushy AI commercials?

The wealthy will just move on to the next thing to inflate. Capitalists don't work. They don't care about anything other than ROI.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lucelu2@lemmy.zip 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

yes, We can't prevent the bubble burst. We can hope it happens sooner rather than later but the bubble is baked in. So what companies and individuals can to is basically buy up their detritus at bargain prices. And then use them to make better, more solid companies that do not require $3T investment while showing no fucking profit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] biofaust@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (5 children)

From the entry for "zaibatsu" on Wikipedia:

Under the Allied occupation after the surrender of Japan, a partially successful attempt was made to dissolve the zaibatsu. Many of the economic advisors accompanying the SCAP administration had experience with the New Deal and were highly suspicious of monopolies and restrictive business practices, which they felt to be both inefficient, and to be a form of corporatocracy (and thus inherently anti-democratic).

The only difference? The zaibatsu actually diversified their operations.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 16 points 6 days ago (9 children)

I'll just wait for the movies to come out ten years later telling us exactly how they all lost our money again.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (10 children)

Unpopular opinion but this will not as bad as housing bubble and we're way past bubbles actually popping in contemporary economy. Even China corrected for its massive ghost city housing bubble just recently and that was actually worse than ai tech overvaluation.

[–] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Can you explain how we're beyond bubbles like I'm 5? Is it that there are gentler market corrections now?

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Yes, contemporary economy and free markets are so imaginary now that cascading effects and bubble pops like 2008 are very unlikely. American stock market in particular is so far off reality (even before AI boom) that it's basically a video game with no actual relevancy to true gross product. While China/Russia is a dictatorship with no representation of reality at all and can easily hide the burden of bad economic policies in the obedient peasant class.

So we have dictatorship with imaginary worlds vs "free markets" living in their own imaginary simulation. Economy is all made up now and cascades are basically impossible because that requires rationality.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Part4 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

This turned out a little bit long. I wonder if anyone will bother reading it.

A lot of this so-called 'bubble' is based on capital expenditure in support of a technology that probably doesn't have the capability AI company ceo's claim, but does have fascinating, and in terms of how society is currently arranged possibly extremely harmful, potential.

I know what ai companies have done, and what they are likely to do, in the pursuit of profit is shit; I would say that is a capitalism and fascist billionaire issue, rather than a tech issue but ymmv.

And there is the energy consumption problem. I think ai ceo's and tech broligarchs would privately say 'compare the energy consumed by my datacentre to the energy consumed by the workers it has replaced and you will see it is fairly efficient.......' (I am saying what I expect they think, not what I agree with).

The concern that the economy currently has all of its eggs in the ai basket seems reasonable, but I see why capital is betting on it as big as it is. Any concerns regarding the economic disruption of an ai bubble popping is nothing compared to what could happen if 50%+ white collar workers are made redundant. We saw the number of essential workers needed per 1 million people during covid: it wasn't many. Most jobs exist because the people exist to do them, corralled into the pyramidal structure of capitalism, where money trickles upwards. AI might push us into an era where the people exist but the jobs do not.

Anyway, I see this 'bubble' as being like the dotcom bubble, which didn't kill the web when it popped. The gpu's this capital expenditure has paid for are going to continue to be used, even as this economic period shakes itself out. They aren't just going to evaporate. It isn't like worthless debt being packaged up and resold without a chance of it being recouped, even if the prospect of what can be achieved with AI is currently over-valued.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ezterry@lemmy.zip 4 points 5 days ago

I see "gold rush" the company selling shovels is making out like a bandit, everyone else is make a profit on the previous gen but requires a 10x cost increase for the next gen. And thus 10x more shovels.. As soon as 10x more shovels stops giving 10x+ improvements this is the wrong investment.

Hints are we already reached this point.

Some AI companies will pivot and improve in other ways with more linear costs/results.. The ones hoping the line continues to the moon.. I think they overshot.. I just don't know when it will fall back..

load more comments
view more: next ›